*************
M*W: It doesn't seem to be too hard to follow the given rules of one's own religion, but I just don't understand why the belief in a deity is also required for most religions. On the one hand are the rules and regulations of religion which are meant to be obeyed, but on the other hand is the deity who forgives and/or dies for the ones who don't obey the rules. Why are both needed? One should suffice. Isn't that a bit redundant? I believe it is all the more proof there is no god. Man created religion to control the masses, so he created the rules and regulations AND a god to enforce them. Yikes!
M*W: It doesn't seem to be too hard to follow the given rules of one's own religion, but I just don't understand why the belief in a deity is also required for most religions. On the one hand are the rules and regulations of religion which are meant to be obeyed, but on the other hand is the deity who forgives and/or dies for the ones who don't obey the rules. Why are both needed? One should suffice. Isn't that a bit redundant? I believe it is all the more proof there is no god. Man created religion to control the masses, so he created the rules and regulations AND a god to enforce them. Yikes!