Why atheism makes you mean

S.A.M.

S.A.M.

uniquely dreadful
Valued Senior Member
An interesting study that links prosocial behaviour to religiosity:

We have proposed that the cultural spread of religious prosociality may have promoted stable levels of cooperation in large groups, where reputational and reciprocity incentives are insufficient. If so, then reminders of God may not only reduce cheating, but may also increase generosity toward strangers as much as reminders of secular institutions promoting prosocial behavior. These hypotheses were supported in two anonymous economic game experiments, one with a sample of university students and another with nonstudent adults​


322_58_F2.gif


Implicit activation of God concepts, relative to a neutral prime, increased offers in the one-shot, anonymous Dictator Game, t(48) = 2.47, P = 0.02, SE = 0.81, d = 0.71. (27). Priming secular concepts indicating moral authority had a similar effect, t(48) = 2.29, P = 0.03, SE = 0.82, d = 0.67. The results showed not only a quantitative increase in generosity, but also a qualitative shift in social norms. In the control group, the modal response was selfishness, a plurality of players pocketed all $10. In the God group, the mode shifted to fairness, a plurality of players split the money evenly (N = 75). It remains to be seen, however, whether these effects would occur if the recipient was clearly marked as an outgroup member.
Click to expand...

Thoughts of God, activated without conscious awareness (2), thus caused greater generosity between anonymous strangers. One explanation for this finding is that the imagined presence of a morally concerned supernatural watcher reduced the anonymity of the situation and heightened prosocial reputational concerns, thereby increasing prosocial behavior. Alternatively, it is possible that thoughts of God and thoughts of charity or benevolence are cognitively associated; thus, priming the former concept increased behavioral tendencies consistent with the latter (1). This explanation, however, begs the question as to why God concepts are mentally associated with charity in the first place. These alternative explanations await further experimental investigation.​

Comments??



reference:
1. A. F. Shariff, A. Norenzayan, Psychol. Sci. 18, 803 (2007)
2. J. A. Bargh, T. L. Chartrand, Am. Psychol. 54, 462 (1999)
 
Reciprocal altruism and sharing predate deific conceptualization. Couldn't stable levels of cooperation in large groups simply be a larger-scale development of early social behaviour?
 
Maybe you should write to them. Is there any evidence for prosocial behaviour in athiestic societies [apart from communism]?
 
Are there any atheistic societies apart from communism? Anyway, it's more a question of separating the extrapolation of group altruism from "godliness".
 
You could tell us about the prosocial behaviour of communist societies, seeing as you are/were pretty close to those ideals
 
How would culture or tradition associate God with charity? And why?
 
Ah so the association of charity and God is created by churches?
 
S.A.M. said:
So charity was created by the religious, interesting.
Click to expand...

I think one of the problems here is the distinct separation of "religious" versus "community". In the old days, waaaaaaaay back, people might not have had organized religion, yet they might well have, and probably did have, empathy and compassion for their family and tribal members.

But ....remember, tht was reseverved for only a select few, not the whole fuckin' human race as people these days try to claim!

I do think, however, that religious organizations probably extended that usual, limited ideal to apply to all those other stinkin', nasty people that no one seems to like or want! :D

Baron Max
 
That is a completely different thing. They didn't create it, but they do exploit it, the same way a clan chieftan solidifies their power by sponsoring a feast.
 
Baron Max said:
I think one of the problems here is the distinct separation of "religious" versus "community". In the old days, waaaaaaaay back, people might not have had organized religion, yet they might well have, and probably did have, empathy and compassion for their family and tribal members.
Baron Max
Click to expand...

We're talking about charity to anonymous strangers. Everyone is mean to their family. :bugeye:
 
I donate money and my time to charities all of the time, and I'm an atheist. I do it because of how it makes me feel, to help out other people. Everyone has their reasons for what they do and I think it has more to do with who you are and how you were raised than it does with what your religion is.
 
Charity is the filthiest invention of the human mind: first you steal what belongs to everyone; then you use the policeman and the atom bomb to protect it. You give charity to prevent the have-nots from rebelling against you. It also makes you feel less guilty. All do-gooders feel 'high' when they do good.

U.G. Krishnamurti​
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top