Scroll up. And if you can't figure out from my posts what I said, it's your problem.
My response to you was this little thing called sarcasm.
You really shouldn't judge people based on their opinions. That's frowned upon in the science community. Just saying.
Your assertions fail to meet ontological parsimony - a government conspiracy, which you implied here:
Don't be naive. Corrupt politicians have to do with everything that happens. Trust me on this one, bro. You'll learn the truth of things eventually too.
Is by definition unverifirable.
You've also failed to meet the rule of laplace - providing no evidence of government involvment in the documentary, which you have not watched, and no proof of propaganda.
This comment:
That's stupid. The government could have used this money to feed the poor but instead they waste it searching for fairy tales. I didn't even open the link, the mere notion of such unproductive activity disgusts me.
Makes an assertion without proof.
It presents your opinion as a fact - strictly speaking, presenting an something as a fact without knowing whether or not its a fact is called a lie.
No worries. Scientific minds like ours need not watch a bunch of christian propaganda anyway.
Again, you're presenting an assertion as a fact, without proof, and without taking the time to verify your assertion - again, this is known as lying.
So where does that leave us?
Your assertions fail the principle of ontological parsimony.
You fail to meet the rule of laplace.
You present assertions and opinions as fact, without knowing whether or not they are actually true.
For all you know, the producer of that documentary was an atheist, and it blames christians for the holocaust.
