Leo Volont said:
"The Same" only in the categorical scientific sense that there is light and sound perceived. But the Scientific Controls through out the moral, emotional and even religious content as irrelevent. But it isn't irrelevent, is it?
When these things are experienced because of severe brain trauma, how do you speculate that we, in fact, know that they have some religios content. It may be the brain shutting down, and that is why these things are experienced, not that we are on our way 'back to God' before we are taken to life again. Dont you think that an all-powerful God would know if we are, in fact, going to die or not? Why would he be so preemptive in his taking us away, when he knows that we will regain life?
Leo Volont said:
You need to admit to us and yourself that your Scientists are just bean counters and that they understand and regard nothing that isn't strictly quantifiable -- making most of their conclusions irrelevent to the points being discussed, which go way beyond category and quantity. If you look at the Universe through a microscope you'll never see anything bigger then a bug. Not exactly the Big Picture, is it?
How are most of the conclusions irrelevent to the topic at hand. You were trying, as others have, to say the NDE's show us the gateway to heaven or whatever. Medical professionals produced those same things through other means, thus saying, they have nothing to do with heaven, its only the way our brain dies. Im not sure who supposedly looked at the universe through a moicroscope, but I'm pretty sure that you can see things a whole hell of a lot smaller than a bug. Telescopes are used for viewing the universe, not microscopes.
I would also like to point out that understanding the things that compose and make the universe act the way it does are very valid ways to further prod into how everything works. Unlike the religious fanatics out there, the science community wants an explination for why things happen, other that, 'God did it'.