if there is no heaven is life just a series of coincidences?
Give us some bona fide examples of miracles, and ill try to shed a little light on the situation
but if we have no existance until we are about 3, which is one of my earliest memories, then i say that that is a total crock of poo. reality doesnt come with existance, reality comes with interaction with other peoples lives.
Reality- a. something that exists independently of ideas concerning it b. something that exists independently of all other things and from which all other things derive.
You were wrong to say reality comes to be with interaction. Reality comes with existence, but the interaction of humans allows for the concept of reality to be understood and elaborated upon.
as a child you have no knowledge of your surrounding until you are tought, but who is to define reality and intelligence.
You are experiencing reality even if you do not know what to make of it. Knowledge of your surrondings leads one to understand and comprehend the reality we inhabit.
then i feel sorry for you since there are people who are "ghost hunters" and people who have seen miracles... like statues crying blood, and other unexplainable phenomena... what do you say to that?
Being a Ghost hunter does not mean that there are ghosts. I can label myself a dragon hunter, does that mean dragons exist? Miracles can be explained by science, I can guarantee if a statue did bleed like you mentioned that any average professional scientist could find the reason this happened. The only way to sway someone with that "miracle" is to prove to them actual qualified people examined the statue and that there was no tampering done to the statue. But I can promise you that there has never been a real case of a statue bleeding. Statues do not contain a heart, veins, capillaries, arteries or any mechanism used in association with blood, if it bled, it was tampered with.
Giving you the benefit of the doubt on the unexplainable phenomena, I would say that if we do not have the current means to find a promising explanation for an event, that does not mean there isnt any. We as humans still have not reached the point where are understanding of the world is complete, actually we are far from it.
By you saying that unexplainable phenomena must be caused by God is like saying "Even though we might not have reached the capability to understand a particular event, I will not hesitate to attribute it to my notion of a Supreme being." You are pretending to understand unexplainable phenomena. You would probably be quite upset if a scientist gave you an unsatisfactory explanation of the particular event, especially if given with no evidence to support his claim. so why should you give a unsatisfactory explanation? You have a vague understanding of this complex world so maybe it would be better to say......hey you know what, I have no idea what occured. Think about the past.....it would begin to rain.....people would say how do you explain this? The answer was I have no idea, we cannot currently explain this, but some people would proclaim, there is no reasonable explanation..........God did it. See what they arent realizing is that just because it cant currently be explained does not mean it cant be explained.
You shouldnt jump to conclusions based on ignorance of a subject. "Science cannot explain this rain to me so it must be God, yep im sure it is...." Science then progressed and explained rain. So do you think there is a possibility you are just attributing certain phenomena to God on the basis of ignorance??? I think so. The idea that God did it, does not win by default.