Not necessarily. Sometimes the accusers are wrong? Sometimes a white might feel like whites in general are being blamed for something when somebody was only trying to accuse specific whites.
Celebrating Christmas only puts down the fourth of July when you spit on copies of the declaration of independence as part of your Christmas celebration.
Well we could all make accusations against specific individuals. We could talk about 'black crime' and be speaking of specific individuals and yet someone would say that it is racist to categorize all blacks as criminals which is inferred by 'black crime'. This still doesn't explain why it is racist for a white person to be proud of their heritage.
Well no one would spit on it but flag burning is ok
Some might go so far in the effort to 'reclaim' their lost identity that they veer straight into the same web of lies that were perpetrated against them. Behold! The Chosen People From The Caucasus and The Iceman Inheritance written by African American 'scholar' Michael Bradley (we know blacks are not capable of racism only whites and I'll show you evidence):
In Chosen People From the Caucasus, Bradley extends his "Iceman" theory to a provocative and controversial discussion of the Hebrews. "Given their relatively small numbers, Jews have had an inordinately great influence on Western Civilization," says Bradley. "And, given the fact that Western Civilization has come to dominate the world over the past five hundred years, Jews have accordingly played a wildly disproportional role in the unfolding drama of all humanity."
Chosen People From the Caucasus focuses on the two separate groups of people who came from the Caucasus Mountains of the Middle East: the Biblical Hebrews who emerged from the southern Caucasus between 3000-2000 BC to invade Palestine, and the northern Caucasus "Khazars" who were converted to Judaism about 740 A.D. The Khazars were pushed into Central and Eastern Europe by Mongol invasions, and their descendants comprise the vast majority of modern Jewry. Both peoples, ironically, are considered to be "Jews"-- although they have no direct historical or genetic connections with each other -- except as they shared a Neanderthal origin in the Caucasus Mountains in the far distant and ancient pre-Judaic past.
Bradley contends that people and cultures emerging from the Caucasus Mountains (a known refuge of late-lingering Neanderthal populations) in proto-historical and historical times would have remained highly intelligent, highly aggressive and psychosexually maladapted (promoting a high level of in-group cohesion). These traits, Bradley contends, explain the survival of Biblical Hebrews against all odds and also the inordinate social influence of modern Western Jews.
Bradley contends that there is no mystique of "the chosen people." "Monotheism" -- a purely male and abstract Godhead -- is merely a result of Neanderthal glacial physical and mental adaptations or "maladaptations". Proven Neanderthal in-group cohesion and extreme aggression together resulted in a fiercely parochial "chosen people" perspective. The cultural fusion of the two separate streams of "Jews" has, since the 16th century, played an important role in the evolution of Western Civilization and thus in the molding of the entire world's present cultural profile.
Bradley contends that a uniquely high level of lingering Neanderthal aggression, perpetuated by ethnic prohibitions against outside marriage, has been responsible for the major role played by those calling themselves Jews in the discovery and conquest of the Americas, the transatlantic trade in Black Africans as slaves and cultural colonization of non-Whites by the West. It has been a role too often distorted and disguised by loud lamentations of "anti- Semitism."
Iceman Inheritance:
New research suggests that people with blonde hair will be completely extinct in 200 years. Blonde hair occurs only in people from northern Europe. The blonde gene that causes blonde hair color must be on both sides of the family, and according to the World Health Organization, there is now too few people who carry it. Professor Jonathan Rees from Edinburgh University is leading a two-year study into the genetics of blondes. Scientists say blondes will survive longest in Scandinavia where they are most concentrated, and they predict the last one alive will be from Finland.
So there is the passing of the Caucasoid--those of Nordic or Northwest European origins. Michael Bradley opens his book on the Caucasoid problem (The Iceman Inheritance, Warner Books, 1981) like this:
Let’s see if we can better understand the preceding paragraph. Even if abortion and contraceptives were banned in Europe and the US, the White birth rate would still remain below replacement levels. Starting with the new millennium, the US gives a tax credit for all children under the age of one. With that in mind, I ran across an article that appeared in the (Ritter, Malcolm, Detroit News, Oct 30, 2000. “Y chromosome under scope,” 4A). “The work on the DNA sequence of the Y chromosome should help researchers learn about causes of male infertility because it will help them identify genes that men need to make sperm"--we know they are talking about WHITE men.
Chromosomes make genes and gene families and genes help make sperm—a key to the disappearance of the Caucasian gene. Scurrying and scampering like albino rats to schematically study the “Y” and save the White Gene swim tank is the hottest Caucasian Recipe for making White babies as European and American scientists produce the most recent monkey in a test tube—primate—closest thing yet to a human being early in 2001.
"Racism itself is a predisposition of but one Race of Mankind - the White Race. Racism has its origins in the prehistory of the White Race alone. We attribute various threats of our survival to a conscious and self-protecting euphemism. Caucasoid behavior, Caucasoid values and Caucasoid psychology have attributed to the disappearance of the White Race. The problem with the world is white men" (p 3).
Johann Friedrich Blumenbach invented the title “Caucasian” in 1795 in the third edition of his—On the Natural Variety of Mankind. He took the name from Mount Caucasus. It was in that region he presumed was the original forms of mankind. So does "Caucasian" currently refer exclusively to people who are from the Caucasus? White today means people of European descent. Is that a misnomer? Regions and countries that are predominantly white, or of mainly European ancestry or Western culture, include Europe, Russia, the US, Canada, Argentina, Uruguay, Australia and New Zealand.
The reason the Caucasus had such an attraction to Blumenbach and other contemporaries of the 18th and 19th centuries was because of its proximity to Mount Ararat, where according to Biblical legend, Noah’s Ark eventually landed after the Deluge. Blumenbach believed the original humans were light-skinned, that the Caucasians had retained this whiteness as a constant, and that darkness of skin was a sign of change from the original. The concept of Caucasian Race and its stated or implied superiority over other races was often used as a moral excuse for colonialism by Western European countries.
He republished the text for general distribution in 1776. Isn’t it a coincidence there were three documents in 1776 helping to shape US Eurocentric History? 1) Thomas Jefferson's Declaration of Independence (on the politics of liberty); 2) Adam Smith's Wealth of Nations (on the economics of individualism); and 3) Blumenbach's treatise on racial classification (on the science of human diversity).
"Afrikans were descendants of Noah through Ham, whose sons were Cush (Ethiopia-Nubia), Misraim (Kemet or ancient Egypt), Phut (Somalia) and Canaan (Palestine). The sons of Cush, according to the biblical account, settled in Western Asia, the so-called Middle East, "'bounded east by the eastern branch of the Euphrates and the Persian gulf, south by Arabia, or the Arabian Sea, west by the Red Sea and Egypt, and north by Canaan and Syria and in Africa itself. Egyptians and the Ethiopians were confederated in the same government and soon became the same people in politics, literature and peculiarities.
The portion of the Earth which was first peopled, after Adam and Eve had left Paradise, was the land of Ethiopia, on the river Gihon that went out of the Garden of Eden, "which compasseth the whole land (or country) of Ethiopia," 4003 years before Christ. The children of Ethiopia were from Adam to Noah" and through Noah's progeny. (James W. C. Pennington, A Text Book of the Origin and History, etc. etc. of the Colored People Hartford, CT: L. Skinner, Printer, 1841; reprint Detroit: Negro History Press)"
http://www.michaelbradley.info/books/iceman_chosen.html
http://stewartsynopsis.com/Synopsis 2.htm
Oh no African americans cannot be affected by a racist system the way whites were, no not black folk because black folk are INNATELY peaceful and loving compared to the aggressive and maladaptive white people (and the jews. Did I forget to mention the jews?) who come from god only knows where, certainly not mother earth! No. Blacks are and can only be victims of it never perpetrate it. You see Niraka blacks cannot be racist because the problem in the world are 'white men' and before you go on about how this is a marginalized view within the african american community today I would also say that white racist groups are also marginalized within mainstream white society. So lets just put it this way both, black and white, are capable of being fucked up racist assholes and yes Asians too. So please don't give me this condescending bullshit about white racism and how the poor black man is being shitted upon, not now, not in this day and age, certainly not when a black man is sitting in the oval office. GET OVER IT!!! Get your mind out of the civil rights movement and into the year 2009. Blacks and whites are not dealing the same issues in the same society in the same way.
