What's up with Iraqi resistors?

More useful info from the Iraqi information minister to help out.

Martin your jokes are disgusting and have no info spare yourself the embaresment and finish off your pathetic little existance .
 
Originally posted by Ghassan Kanafani
1) Dont make assumptions about my capability to acknowledge Saddams crimes you have no idea about my opinion on him so ask instead of assert .
Click to expand...
My assumptions are based on your posts in this forum.
2) Your compare is incorrect . The UN is not the gun-fabricant and Saddam the shooter : The UN is the police who holds a house under fire while the family-leader has taken the peoples hostage : The UN's tactic is starving them out .
Click to expand...
Saddam made the choice to starve those people, not the UN. To think the UN would just buckle and allow Saddam to do what he pleased, is foolish.
 
My assumptions are based on your posts in this forum.

Then you have logical problem

Saddam made the choice to starve those people, not the UN. To think the UN would just buckle and allow Saddam to do what he pleased, is foolish.

Does your world always come in black and white ? Not doing anything is not the same as enforcing measures that starve a peoples . As you have seen the result of the starvation was 0 because Saddam had plenty and cared little . As you have seen the invasion has taken place regardless of those starvation measurements , in other words it was for nothing .

You cannot deny that after the invasion .
 
Shia is handy when it suiths is it not ?

Please dont forget to mention that the deaths of the uprising where direct cause of the sell-out of the USA military who stood and whatched and did nothing as they themselves have organzied and promoted the uprising .

Dont think we will forget that
 
Originally posted by Ghassan Kanafani
Does your world always come in black and white ? Not doing anything is not the same as enforcing measures that starve a peoples . As you have seen the result of the starvation was 0 because Saddam had plenty and cared little . As you have seen the invasion has taken place regardless of those starvation measurements , in other words it was for nothing .

You cannot deny that after the invasion .
Click to expand...
No, it's because I don't see the World in black and white, that I see why sanctions were used. The blame for those deaths rest on the shoulders of Saddam. He is to blame, other countries have a right not to deal with any other country if they so choose, and that's what the UN members did.

Shia is handy when it suiths is it not ?
Click to expand...
I didn't want to be accused of using a bias American source.;)
 
Originally posted by dsdsds
The UN has proved to be nothing but a USA puppet.
Here is more proof that Saddam did a RELATIVELY great job until the strangling UN and US sactions.

scroll down to see iraq comparison pre and post sanction
Click to expand...

The UN is a US puppet, huh, that must be why the US had such overwhelming UN support.

"We made them drink poison last night and Saddam Hussein's soldiers and his great forces gave the Americans a lesson which will not be forgotten by history. Truly."
 
Originally posted by dsdsds
shianews .. Oh yeah, that's an objective and unbiased "news" article.:rolleyes:

Anyway, I never said Saddam was a great moral person. He was the lesser of other (current) "evils" in Iraq.
Click to expand...
Perhaps this is a better source then: http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/2921553.stm

Saddam was a murderous scumbag and to compare his reign in Iraq with US occupation, is foolish.
 
Originally posted by static76
other countries have a right not to deal with any other country if they so choose, and that's what the UN members did.
Click to expand...

No country has the right to "deal" with any other country that does not pose an immediate and direct threat.
 
Originally posted by truth
"We made them drink poison last night and Saddam Hussein's soldiers and his great forces gave the Americans a lesson which will not be forgotten by history. Truly."
Click to expand...
Good quote.:D

information_minister_oscar.jpg
 
Originally posted by dsdsds
No country has the right to "deal" with any other country that does not pose an immediate and direct threat.
Click to expand...
Sure they do. Besides, Iraq showed they were a threat with the Kuwait invasion.
 
Originally posted by static76
Perhaps this is a better source then: http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/2921553.stm

Saddam was a murderous scumbag and to compare his reign in Iraq with US occupation, is foolish.
Click to expand...

How many did he kill? Numbers (in reliable sources as bbc) indicate anywhere from thousands to tens of thousands.

peanuts when compared with:

1/2 million children under 5 killed (actually tortured by hunger and disease first) by US (and UN puppet). And the hundreds of thousands more that will die as a cascading consequence of the war and occupation.
 
No, it's because I don't see the World in black and white, that I see why sanctions were used. The blame for those deaths rest on the shoulders of Saddam. He is to blame, other countries have a right not to deal with any other country if they so choose, and that's what the UN members did.

They have the right to let it starve , yes ? And that after he was PUT THERE in the first place .

Saddam was a murderous scumbag and to compare his reign in Iraq with US occupation, is foolish.

Only foolish to a person who knows from CNN .

Iraq showed they were a threat with the Kuwait invasion.

A threat to who ? A threat to Kuweit ? Kuweit has no legitimacy of existance you can go and occupy and regime change them if you wish .
 
Martin , your Al-Sahaf quotes are showing your disrespect for a peoples who have suffered under him , and it reflects the US policy not to give a shit about him while he was a trator . You would probably not even know Sahaf was a SHIA .

Baboon

If I would drop to your pathetic level I would be quoting Ari and Rummy all day to try to show your neanderthal-understanding of reality . Afterall no support of the trator would be found with me , while your support for your baboons is overwhelming .

pathetic
 
Originally posted by dsdsds
1/2 million children under 5 killed (actually tortured by hunger and disease first) by US (and UN puppet). And the hundreds of thousands more that will die as a cascading consequence of the war and occupation.
Click to expand...
Once again, the choice was Saddam's, not the UN's. He's to blame.
 
Originally posted by Ghassan Kanafani
They have the right to let it starve , yes ? And that after he was PUT THERE in the first place .
Click to expand...
Saddam made that decision to let them starve, stop trying to pass blame from its rightful source.
Only foolish to a person who knows from CNN .
Click to expand...
Or any thinking individual...
A threat to who ? A threat to Kuweit ? Kuweit has no legitimacy of existance you can go and occupy and regime change them if you wish .
Click to expand...
Funny how you dismiss Kuwait's right to exist, yet a scum nation like Iraq you feel should be allowed to do what they want.
 
Originally posted by static76
Once again, the choice was Saddam's, not the UN's. He's to blame.
Click to expand...

I urge you to get informed on the facts. I posted a link above and here it is again . please read the iraq statistics before and after sanctions. The sanctions and the distruction of iraq infrastructure (by the 1st gulf war) were responsible for the deterioation of Iraqi health, economic, and social factors.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top