What's up with Iraqi resistors?

S

static76

The Man, The Myth, The Legend
Registered Senior Member
Eight-two killed, 229 hurt in Najaf car bomb blast

A car bomb killed at least 82 people and wounded 229 others outside one of Shiite Islam's holiest shrines in the central Iraqi city of Najaf, medical sources told AFP.

The Najaf educational hospital reported 81 dead and 200 wounded from the bombing, said Doctor Ali Jawad, a senior resident at the medical facility.

He added that 100 of the wounded were listed in serious condition.

Another person was reported dead, as well as 29 wounded, at the city's general hospital, said Doctor Hussein al-Wan.

The bombing killed Iraq's top Shiite political leader, Ayatollah Mohammad Baqer al-Hakim.
Click to expand...
http://sg.news.yahoo.com/030829/1/3dspp.html

They're just bombing any kind of target now it seems. What's their plan with these kinds of attacks. Why attack the UN, why attack a shrine?
 
Whoever the bombers, one thing is for sure, USA is now 100% responsible for the security of the IRAQI people. It will only get worse when and if the USA finds a way to slowly and discreetly wiggle out of iraq (ex. initially letting in UN forces). Iraq is headed for a horrific civil war. I've said it before and I'll say it again, Iraq will never again (or not for a very long time, and not without tremendous human suffereing and death) have it as good as they had it under Saddam.
 
Originally posted by dsdsds
Whoever the bombers, one thing is for sure, USA is now 100% responsible for the security of the IRAQI people. It will only get worse when and if the USA finds a way to slowly and discreetly wiggle out of iraq (ex. initially letting in UN forces). Iraq is headed for a horrific civil war. I've said it before and I'll say it again, Iraq will never again (or not for a very long time, and not without tremendous human suffereing and death) have it as good as they had it under Saddam.
Click to expand...

You're right. Wholesale, government sanctioned murder, rape, terror, political imprisonment, torture, feeding people to lions, etc. is far better than a chance to fix things. The US is 100% responsible for security of the Iraqi people? Wow, imagine them actually not trying to kill each other over their own internal religious and ethnic issues.
 
Originally posted by dsdsds
Whoever the bombers, one thing is for sure, USA is now 100% responsible for the security of the IRAQI people.
Click to expand...
So now the US is to blame for not stopping bombers? The Iraqis commiting these acts are to blame.

Would you please clarify how this should be done.
It will only get worse when and if the USA finds a way to slowly and discreetly wiggle out of iraq (ex. initially letting in UN forces).
Click to expand...
Right...because the UN hasn't been targeted yet, and has full support in Iraq. Oh wait...didn't their HQ get bombed.
:rolleyes:
Iraq is headed for a horrific civil war.
Click to expand...
Highly unlikely, but with Shrubya's decisions, it's a possibility.
I've said it before and I'll say it again, Iraq will never again (or not for a very long time, and not without tremendous human suffereing and death) have it as good as they had it under Saddam.
Click to expand...
And I've said it before and I'll say it again, that's pure idiocy.

How the hell was living under Saddam better?
 
Martin , you need to get your shit straugh for a moment before you are blaming what you have caused on my peoples you :

1) supposed ethnic conflicts would be result of imperial mapmaking
2) the conflicts are not ethnic or religious but political

There are many groups with interests in Iraq who fight , many from outside as well . Some of them have an armageddon mentality where destruction within the territory is considered good news by default . Others have political motives and strategical considerations for their assaults .

And yes Saddam was better than this , your disgusting attempts to keep pushing yourself forward as some altruist probably wont stop untill you have a new plane in your buildings . Then your hate will show itself again , what would be interesting is the indifferent effect it would have on your policy , proving you kill angry as well as with a smile for hatefull as well as altruistic motives , concluding they are all one and the same : your ignorance and greed .

Now as for this attack :

* Ba'athist would have no problems killing those from Supreme Councill for Islamic Revolution .
* Salafi militants would have no problems killing them either .

For both groups there is benefit : As the councill has vast peoples support , the peoples are the ones under attack which leads for the peoples to be the ones revolting . This merely increases overal resistance . And yes civil war would be a post-USA consequence .

Thanks again amerika

And in addition dsds : "Saddam was to blame for those deaths, not sanctions."

The guilt of one does not do away the guilt of another . Yes the UN is to blaim .
 
When British troops enterd Basra, there were warehouses filled with UN food, Saddam had squirreled away. The reason those people died was Saddam's despotism. Whether you like Bush or not, arguing they were better off under Saddam, is just plain absurd.
 
Yes Saddam was better than anarchy what do you know about Saddam Martin ? What do you know about how things went on there ? U know shit all u know is your indoctrinated world-view u get on a platter presented by your fascist regime .
 
Originally posted by truth
When British troops enterd Basra, there were warehouses filled with UN food, Saddam had squirreled away. The reason those people died was Saddam's despotism. Whether you like Bush or not, arguing they were better off under Saddam, is just plain absurd.
Click to expand...
You are correct, but the Anti-America crowd here doesn't want the truth or facts.
 
"You are correct, but the Anti-America crowd here doesn't want the truth or facts."

JUCHE !!!!!!!

indoctrination beyond amazement
 
Originally posted by Ghassan Kanafani
And in addition dsds : "Saddam was to blame for those deaths, not sanctions."

The guilt of one does not do away the guilt of another . Yes the UN is to blaim .
Click to expand...
So is a gun manufacturer responsible for any murders with their guns? An automobile maker the reason for traffic accidents?

Why is it so hard for you to admit that Saddam was horrible for Iraq?
 
Originally posted by Ghassan Kanafani
Martin , you need to get your shit straugh for a moment before you are blaming what you have caused on my peoples you :

1) supposed ethnic conflicts would be result of imperial mapmaking
2) the conflicts are not ethnic or religious but political

There are many groups with interests in Iraq who fight , many from outside as well . Some of them have an armageddon mentality where destruction within the territory is considered good news by default . Others have political motives and strategical considerations for their assaults .

And yes Saddam was better than this , your disgusting attempts to keep pushing yourself forward as some altruist probably wont stop untill you have a new plane in your buildings . Then your hate will show itself again , what would be interesting is the indifferent effect it would have on your policy , proving you kill angry as well as with a smile for hatefull as well as altruistic motives , concluding they are all one and the same : your ignorance and greed .

Now as for this attack :

* Ba'athist would have no problems killing those from Supreme Councill for Islamic Revolution .
* Salafi militants would have no problems killing them either .

For both groups there is benefit : As the councill has vast peoples support , the peoples are the ones under attack which leads for the peoples to be the ones revolting . This merely increases overal resistance . And yes civil war would be a post-USA consequence .

Thanks again amerika

And in addition dsds : "Saddam was to blame for those deaths, not sanctions."

The guilt of one does not do away the guilt of another . Yes the UN is to blaim .
Click to expand...

"Lying is forbidden in Iraq. President Saddam Hussein will tolerate nothing but truthfulness as he is a man of great honor and integrity. Everyone is encouraged to speak freely of the truths evidenced in their eyes and hearts."
 
We have destroyed 2 tanks, fighter planes, 2 helicopters and their shovels - We have driven them back."

"The authority of the civil defense ... issued a warning to the civilian population not to pick up any of those pencils because they are booby traps," he said, adding that the British and American forces were "immoral mercenaries" and "war criminals" for such behavior.
"I am not talking about the American people and the British people," he said. "I am talking about those mercenaries. ... They have started throwing those pencils, but they are not pencils, they are booby traps to kill the children."


More useful info from the Iraqi information minister to help out.:D
 
So is a gun manufacturer responsible for any murders with their guns? An automobile maker the reason for traffic accidents?

Why is it so hard for you to admit that Saddam was horrible for Iraq?

1) Dont make assumptions about my capability to acknowledge Saddams crimes you have no idea about my opinion on him so ask instead of assert .

2) Your compare is incorrect . The UN is not the gun-fabricant and Saddam the shooter : The UN is the police who holds a house under fire while the family-leader has taken the peoples hostage : The UN's tactic is starving them out .
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top