What is Time?

Status
Not open for further replies.
Russ_Watters said:
It could be externally fueled (lasser propulsion). That isn't specified. So this "prediction" has no real value since it is just a cumbersome restatement of something that has been known for 400 years.
Click to expand...

Oh my dear! Cure is refused.
 
edtk said:
That was. I have to go. Next time! Chiao


Yes. Every galaxy is like this. New fact for you: our Universe expands. But now I really have to go. Ciao!
Click to expand...
Yes the universe is expanding which has nothing to do with your silly ideas. By the way all galaxies are not moving away from us. Chow!
 
It is always so funny when these guys that have no idea about science or physics do a few bong hits and come up with these goofy ideas and then cling to those ideas like a tick to a dog.
 
edtk said:
Oh my dear! Cure is refused.
Click to expand...
Here's the beauty of this: You're the one trying to get noticed for your work. So your refusal is just like stuffing your "paper" under your couch cushion. Don't want to discuss/defend your "paper"? Fine: then it's going nowhere.
 
Russ_Watters said:
That's just Newton's first and second laws.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Newton's_laws_of_motion

It doesn't provide any value for your idea, unless you present a testable prediction of your idea that is different from what is already incorporated into current science.
Click to expand...

I don't think you understand anything from physics. You wrote a very-very big bunk above and "your scientists (friends) here" didn't realize your big stupidity. You are sciolists.

I spoke about acceleration, Sir Newton's first law is about speed. Newtons's second law is about the accelerating force. You can combine these two laws but you'll never get my statement. No problem, velocity and acceleration are the same at your semi-literate level.
 
edtk said:
I don't think you understand anything from physics. You wrote a very-very big bunk above and "your scientists (friends) here" didn't realize your big stupidity. You are sciolists.

I spoke about acceleration, Sir Newton's first law is about speed. Newtons's second law is about the accelerating force. You can combine these two laws but you'll never get my statement. No problem, velocity and acceleration are the same at your semi-literate level.
Click to expand...
It's been fun. Bye.
 
Thank you for your leaving. :)
Now we can start speaking about physics.:D
 
Last edited:
edtk said:
What can you do here?
Click to expand...
Nothing, I just understand how the site works. They tolerate almost any amount of crackpot nonsense, but they don't tolerate flaming.
By the way, if somebody tells me how to delete this topic I'll delete it with pleasure. :cool:
Click to expand...
Hit the "report" button under your first post and explain why you want it deleted. I expect they will grant your wish.
 
Bohr did a similar critique of Schroedinger's wave equation. Only much later did the Copenhagen school figure out that it was equivalent to Planck's matrix formulation, but not before bringing poor Schroedinger's literally to tears. Stick with it. An idea whose time (pun intended) has come is unstoppable.
 
I for one never for a moment considered matter as a paucity of a space wave, It makes perfect sense. QFT works by treating particles of matter as if time did not exist. Perhaps there is an alternative formulation.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top