I'm surprised I can find very little about this on Google. I would like to know the distinctions between direct causality and indirect causality.
I found these resources online:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Causality
http://depts.washington.edu/methods/causality.html
So what I get from this:
A direct cause acts on the object itself.
An indirect cause acts on a third party, which then acts on the object.
An example:
A lot of people say the MPAA supports infringing our rights, for example, with SOPA.
The MPAA does this because of piracy.
So if I pirate a movie, am I directly or indirectly causing my rights to be infringed upon?
He is the direct cause of pirating one movie, or whatever he pirates, but he is not the direct cause of infringing on his rights, as a third party (the MPAA) is acting on the object (infringing rights). So it is indirect, right?
Thank you.
I found these resources online:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Causality
A direct factor is a factor that affects an effect directly, that is, without any intervening factors. (Intervening factors are sometimes called "intermediate factors".)
http://depts.washington.edu/methods/causality.html
A direct causal relationship is one in which a variable, X, is a direct cause of another variable, Y (i.e. it is the immediate determinant of Y within the context of the theoretical system).
So what I get from this:
A direct cause acts on the object itself.
An indirect cause acts on a third party, which then acts on the object.
An example:
A lot of people say the MPAA supports infringing our rights, for example, with SOPA.
The MPAA does this because of piracy.
So if I pirate a movie, am I directly or indirectly causing my rights to be infringed upon?
He is the direct cause of pirating one movie, or whatever he pirates, but he is not the direct cause of infringing on his rights, as a third party (the MPAA) is acting on the object (infringing rights). So it is indirect, right?
Thank you.