What if humans had a "dual brain configuration"?

Status
Not open for further replies.

zira

Registered Senior Member
Imagine ape and human pathology developed slightly differently than in existing evolution. And we all got two totally independant and fully functional maybe concurrent brains, one in each side of our head? :eek: Advantage or disadvantage? :)
We were more intelligent or less? Or more chaotic? More or less emotional?
More calm? Or more hyperactive?
 
I think we already have this, not on each side, though. I think our present brain can be reconfigured to work in more than one way. This is what Buddhists call enlightenment, a shift in the patterns of thought.
 
I think we already have this, not on each side, though. I think our present brain can be reconfigured to work in more than one way. This is what Buddhists call enlightenment, a shift in the patterns of thought.

I have often wonder what they mean by this.
 
Imagine ape and human pathology developed slightly differently than in existing evolution. And we all got two totally independant and fully functional maybe concurrent brains, one in each side of our head?...


What you refer to actually was once the case.

We now enjoy one 'single' brain due to the (relatively) late development of the corpus callosum.

For more on this read : "The Origin of Consciousness in the Breakdown of the Bicameral Mind" by Julian Jaynes.
 
We have two brain hemispheres that are connected through what I suppose is a relatively narrow bandwidth. They contain different processing centers and are differently organized. The left hemisphere operates in a more linear, logical manner, whereas the right hemisphere is more holographic.

This is illustrated by the way our right and left hands work. Due to a peculiarity in our nervous system, below the neck the left hemisphere controls the right side of the body and vice versa. Your right hand is better at learning by instruction, whereas your left hand is better at learning from experience. (This is for right-handed people. I'm not clear on what the difference is in left-handed people. Are their hemispheres reversed?)
 
We have two brain hemispheres that are connected through what I suppose is a relatively narrow bandwidth.

Not true...relatively speaking! They are connected via a bundle of 250 million nerve fibers. That makes them more like a parallel processing activity.
 
Ever wondered why most components in a human are duplicated? Two, arms, two legs, two eyes, two kidneys, etc? This is known as fault tolerance. In all these cases one of the items can be lost but the individual can still survive with essential capabilities although with some loss of efficiency.

It would have been nice if the heart could have had a duplicate and if we were to design an optimum human then I would have included that as an essential. But to the topic - although the brain is not duplicated it is in two halves where each structure is near identical to each other. It would seem that through genetics each half has specilized in a selection of specific functions, however, there is evidence in many cases where those who have sufferred severe damage to one half have been able recover some or a large part of the missing functions in the remaining half. There is also another scenario (wish I could find the reference) where one half failed shortly after birth and all normal functions developed in a single half. This was featured on PBS within the last year where the redundant half was not entirely dead and was causing some interference. The final choice was surgery to remove the offending half. The result was that the patient appeared entirely normal. That in my mind raised the question of whether really our dual brains do indeed have a lot of spare capacity.

So in effect I think we do have two brains where each has been assigned specific tasks but each could do any or all. In actuality if one half is damaged the biology does not make the transition of a missing function to the other half easily automatic or optimal. This transfer effectiveness also correlates with age, i.e. someone young has a far better chance to recover the lost fucntions in the backup half. "Transfer" is probably the wrong term, re-learning is really what has to occur and that is much easily in the young.
 
Last edited:
Imagine ape and human pathology developed slightly differently than in existing evolution. And we all got two totally independant and fully functional maybe concurrent brains, one in each side of our head? :eek: Advantage or disadvantage? :)
We were more intelligent or less? Or more chaotic? More or less emotional?
More calm? Or more hyperactive?
Have you read A Scanner Darkly or seen the movie? Both are excellent. It's about an under cover narc, who's brain is split into two combative entities from heavy use of the drug Substance D. I highly recommend it.
 
hmmm i don't know if Saburo Sakai was left handed - but anyway:

Although in agony from his injuries (he had a serious head wound [8] from a bullet that had passed through his skull and the left side of his brain, leaving the entire left side of his body paralyzed, and was left blind in one eye)Sakai managed to fly his damaged Zero in a four-hour, 47-minute flight over 560 nautical miles (1,040 km) back to his base on Rabaul, using familiar volcanic peaks as guides

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Saburo_Sakai
 
What about being split down the middle- one of you, and another of you.
Thats like having two selfs.
Sort of.
 
Dual brains... well, we really have far more than dual brains. We have a ton of stuff in our nervous system that provides feed back to our brain that we're barely conscious of. I don't know that much about human physiology, but we do have a nervous&hormonal systems that regulate breathing, heart rate, the gut, blood flow, etc. I'd say that our awareness of "self" is a necessary trait to function as a complete organisms, even though there are a whole bunch of processes operating in tandem and providing feed back to each other.

The cost of having split functions that we were aware of would be rather high, as it would greatly impair function. Imagine if you had to run everything you wanted to do past another person, first, who had control of the other half of your body. It'd be lame.

Ever wondered why most components in a human are duplicated? Two, arms, two legs, two eyes, two kidneys, etc? This is known as fault tolerance. In all these cases one of the items can be lost but the individual can still survive with essential capabilities although with some loss of efficiency.

Wait, what?
We have bilateral symmetry because our ancestors are bilaterally symmetric. Presumably bilateral symmetry was advantageous because it allowed efficient navigation through the environment due to cephalization.

Most of our 'features' are left overs from ancestors. As tetrapods, we have 4 limbs. The difficulty in complex organisms, such as us, to have a nonlethal, functional, and beneficial radical Hox mutation is pretty much nil. It'd be like a juckyard fire producing a Boeing 747. Instead, we've had to modify what we're stuck with.
 
Imagine ape and human pathology developed slightly differently than in existing evolution. And we all got two totally independant and fully functional maybe concurrent brains, one in each side of our head

It would have been a mutant strain of gene and would not have survived.
 
It may give us telepathy or other great psycic abilities, but otherwise, I'm going to agree with cosmictraveler.
 
We have more than two brains.

We have the electrically based nervous system, and the chemically based everything else.


Since the electrically-based system produces the quickest responses, it gets the most press. However, the endocrine system is as important to how we deal with life as the brain.

I don't know about you guys, but I often have to deal with my brain's logic fighting against my body's innate desires (and often losing).
 
We have the electrically based nervous system, ....

That is why most doctors and neurologists do not understand how brain and autonomous system work. They never study the rigorous control system and what sets the set point, what is the algorithm that is behind the automated system. Then there is brain which has its own complex logic. A doctor has to understand "Information Theory", "Decision Theory" etc that a EE studies....
 
On second thought, we do have a dual brain configuration: the cerebral cortex and the cerebellum are to major parts to the brain. The cerebral cortex has to do with emotions, thinking, memory, reasoning, and personality. The cerebellum deals with motor funtions and learned body movements, such as walking, running, martial arts, or doing surgery, y'now simple stuff like that. :D
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top