I don't have any complaints with how this forum has been moderated. The moderators (primarily Kittamaru I think) have been doing a good job. The forum could definitely be better than it currently is, but I don't think that a moderator could make those improvements.
Like other fora on Sciforums, what 'Religion' really needs is a better class of participant. Right now, it seems to be dominated by one or two theists who seem to argue simply to get all the atheists excited and to be the center of everyone else's attention, and a group of militant atheists with more attitude than brains. (There are some notable exceptions like Sarkus, who I find smart, interesting and well worth reading.)
I don't know what a moderator can do about that. (I certainly don't advocate banning anyone.)
My own interests are in philosophy and what I enjoy the most are the philosophical discussions of religious epistemology. What is it that you think that you know? Why are you convinced that it's true? How can human beings possibly know those kind of things?
Most of the atheist/'religionist' arguments do address those kind of issues but don't develop very well because the participants seem too eager to treat the forum as a video-game, where the goal is simply to blast enemies. Too many people seem to think that any argument is a good argument, provided that it's directed against opponents.
Given the nature of Sciforums, there are inevitably going to be a lot of atheists swarming around this forum. I don't think that science is necessarily incompatible with religion, but laypeople out on the street often assume that it is. I was at a local bookstore yesterday and noticed several recent popular titles trying to make that rather dated argument. So atheists love to rally to the authoritative banner of 'science', imagining that science unequivocably justifies their own atheist faith and discredits any kind of religiosity.
So what do I want? I'd like to see Sciforums populated by a better quality of atheist. It needs people who know something about religion, about the diversity of religious ideas that have arisen in different cultures and historical periods, and who don't just automatically equate 'religion' with Christianity, and Christianity with the most extreme forms of Protestant fundamentalism. It needs people willing to acknowledge the best aspects of religion and not just the worst. It needs people who don't just use words like 'reason' and 'logic' as if they are magical fetishes to shake in the face of opponents, but are able to reason well and use logic appropriately. And above all, it needs people who don't conceive of all this as good-guys vs. bad-guys. It needs people who can perceive the abstract philosophical issues that arise in the course of these disputes and who are willing and capable of addressing them.
And obviously, I'd like to see the atheists' opponents rise to the same level. They need to do more than preach their faith and play rhetorical games in hopes of getting all the atheists barking. Religious people need to understand their own tradition and its wider context, and need to be able to represent it well.
If the 'Religion' forum is ever going to have any interest, if it is ever going to be something more than the self-appointed voices of 'reason' agreeing with each other and patting each other on the back, then it will need to attract some smart and well-spoken people who are willing to question the certainties (and willing to take the consequent abuse). If the forum is going to flourish, it needs drama to motivate people to read it and to post their ideas. It needs to be an intelligent dialogue and not just a single-minded monologue.