Once again Kai links to the nonsense of someone else on a topic neither he nor the other person understands. For instance, the section on neutrinos. The author suggests neutrinos were found to have mass by a "miraculous" conversion in particle physics and implies this was to solve the issue of what cold dark matter is. Firstly, the experiments of neutrino mass and dark matter mass have nothing to do with one another, they relate to entirely different phenomena. Secondly, the mass of the neutrino, despite their abundance, is not enough to get anywhere near the amount of material suggested by dark matter. Thirdly, neutrinos are 'hot', they move relativistically.
The author shows in three different ways, on a single topic, he has no knowledge of the history of particle physics, experimental results, the models in question and obviously have no interest in checking if his information on topics he hasn't ever actually studied is anywhere close to true. And thus we see neither does Kai. Why learn anything when you can just say "I agree with that guy because I don't like what you're saying, even though I don't understand it". For those interested he does precisely the same with string theory over in Pseudoscience, in his thread. He parrots someone who has absolutely no knowledge of string theory and then tries to convince those of us who actually do know, work in and read string theory that we're misunderstanding it or missing something he, in his extensive lack of reading, knows.
And amazingly, he has been pushing his work in the physics community for 40 years. That's enough time for most people to pick up something just by osmosis. Not Kai!
