I would love to read that ...
Camus and his buddies were interesting for about a month, then I realised I'd had every thought they'd all set to paper before I was 5 and really didn't care any more.
I would love to read your preschool dissertation on Kierkegaard, Husserl, Chestov, and suicide as expressed by Camus. Or even the paper on the relation between Camus'
absurd and Sartre's
nausea.
In the meantime, yeah ... it was a broad request. Here, I'll throw a list at you:
• Huxley, Aldous:
Brave New World is a literary triumph,
Jesting Pilate a philosophical triumph, and
Doors of Perception a necessary triumph.
• Lee, Harper:
To Kill a Mockingbird is, hands down, the Great American Novel for a while now. Deservedly so.
• Cady, Jack: It's hard to describe Jack Cady;
Inagehi and
Singleton are outstanding novels; his short fiction is gripping; his integrity bleeds off the page.
• Bradbury, Ray: The Great American Writer.
• Barker, Clive:
Weaveworld was the crowning achievement of the 1980s horror movement. (Side note: Robert McCammon's
Boy's Life was the definitive end of that movement; he put down and everybody changed gears--no contemporary can touch that novel in that genre.)
• Andersen, Sherwood:
Winesburg, Ohio is the only book of his I ever read; Twain knew who he was, as I recall. Twain had no choice but to know who he was.
• Salinger, JD: The Great American Prophet.
Raise High the Roof Beams and
Seymour are lessons in how to write human stories.
• Lovecraft, Howard Phillips: I've been through that one.
• L'Engle, Madeleine: The
Wrinkle in Time trilogy put a number of young peoples' classics to shame: Narnia is lackluster; I'm actually reading Terabithia at present ...
I admit I'm not particularly huge on "classic" literature, even the more recent classics. I'm not a Twain fan; Sinclair Lewis annoys me; Poe is childish, imho; okay, there's always Nathaniel Hawthorne--
The Scarlet Letter is an amazing piece of work. Dickens is okay ... I am a bit of a stylist when it comes to fiction, so by the time I get back to Shakespeare, I don't really give a rat's behind.
Of "pure fiction" ... part of the problem with pure fiction is that a clear majority of it is canned. I tried reading Robert Jordan a few months ago; I couldn't do it. The guy had reasonable rhythm and what seemed like a meticulous plot outline; his seeming thesaurus-bender, though, sought words that, while descriptive, weren't the best choice. After a while you got a sense of someone just pounding you with Roget. But books are getting to be like movies. Danielle Steele was bad enough, but then Bret Easton Ellis hit the scene and made sickness popular. Stephen King? It's been said that he doesn't remember writing
Cujo. He had a couple of shining moments, but nothing to warrant such acclaim and popularity. Douglas Coupland and William Gibson have my respect despite fostering movements that, aside from their work, have no place in a bookstore. Well, I don't think Coupland or Gibson would appreciate being called pure fiction, but the problem I have with pure fiction is that it is a product for market, not a work of conscience and art. Ever witness a musical "signing frenzy" (e.g. Seattle, 1992-95) or a movie-release race (e.g. disaster films--
Armageddon,
Deep Impact, a couple of others I can't even recall, and two horrible television movies in a short time) ... heck, Disney even signed Clive Barker to write their counterattack against Harry Potter. That's what literature is like now (e.g. post-Coupland cyberpunk movement). Horror, for instance, did experience a miniature Golden Age after the publication of
The Stand and
Carrie because of the signing race.
I'll stop now ... but I need to mention two more: Steven Brust and Megan Lindholm ... did you know that Anne Rice's
Mayfair Witches earned its title
Taltos (a Gypsy word) only
after Brust repeatedly topped SciFi/Fantasy lists with his novels about Vlad Taltos? Great move. I was reading Brust's 1988
Taltos a few years back and someone I worked with got all snotty about how she hated the fact that writers were trying to copy Anne Rice. That's why I'm so touchy about "pure fiction"--it's all about marketing and pride. Sure, there are some great books out there that are pure fiction, but you might not read some of them because somebody has decided for you that you won't like it.
I won't comment on the mystery novel.
I
promise I'll stop now.
thanx,
Tiassa
(PS--if I have a true religion, it is literature and art. There, I'm still digressing the topic but I can at least make it forum-appropriate
somehow )