I can offer any plausible explanation that fits the facts.
You could, but you choose not to. You offer only
implausible explanations and fantasies to fill in the gaps in the facts. By similar reasoning to what you have shown, I just looked outside and saw nothing in the sky. So there must have been an invisible alien spaceship there.
Right..you're not seeking any explanation. You are only trying to debunk mine.
I'm trying to evaluate the evidence objectively.
No..two jets locking on the same target is confirmation of the existence of the object.
Not necessarily, nor is it confirmation that what they locked-on to was the same object that the people were seeing.
The pilot's radar detected a target and it was evaded by the target when it locked onto it.
Or the pilots manually locked-on to noise and then the noise disappeared. Which is more plausible? We know which you choose.
The noise didn't move like the target did. It just flashed on and off.
It most certainly did. the noise and the "target" stayed stationary near the middle of the screen until blinking away -- an indication that it was nothing. Note, that the "lock" once it is locked becomes artificial. You no longer see the previous target, you see the computer's track of it. When the track gets squirrly, the computer tries to fill in the gaps. This incident has the look of a computer that tried and failed to maintain a lock on noise.
Oh so you claim the report is made up now? lol!
I made no such claim. What I'd like is to see the actual unfiltered report so I don't have to sift through the interpretations of True Believer nuts to figure out what was actually seen.
Assuming that's a full report of what was only summarized in your previous link, that contains a problematic feature for you: it contains timestamps. You cannot plausibly claim events were simultaneous when they had different timestamps. Specifically, there are no simultaneous descriptions of visual sightings and radar locks. There is, however, a description of planes circling around an area where sightings are happening and not seeing anything.
Still, this report doesn't contain the words of any of the witnesses or pilots. It is still way too thin to be of much value -- except of course for people who choose to make up fantasies about alien spaceships to fit the vague descriptions.