<a href="http://www.atheists.org/bone.pit/creationscience.html">http://www.atheists.org/bone.pit/creationscience.html</a>
I'm not sure how you came up with that. Following your logic, there must not be any fossiles on the planet since the planet was not completely immersed in water for 4 billion years. An animal walks beside a cliff, there is a mudslide, the animal is covered in mud which later hardens. There, you have a very good chance of a fossile forming. Amazing isn't it?However, with no flood, there would be no fossils, since scavengers would eat the carcasses.
If scientists are stupid, I feel very sorry for you.Science demands only stupidity; it may politely request intelligence, but it rarely gets it.
A speculation would be a hypothesis. After a hypothesis is formulated, it is tested, and tested again, and retested. If it passes all these tests and still remains the best explanation it is considered a theory. A theory is one step down from a hard fact. It's really very simple tony.Many other people would put speculation at the bottom of the ladder, but not these guys.
Yeah, I guess to you it doesn't matter that you're thinking in the wrong direction eh?It's a process you're unfamiliar with, called "thought."
It's amazing YOU're past grade two, after what you tried to pull of in your last post. And no, the trillions of fossiles did not all come from mudslides on the same cliff. It is an example of one way a fossile forms, there are others too.It's amazing that you are past grade two.
So, the trillions of fossils are all due to "the animal" walking beside a mud cliff which slides?
Says who?The problem is that your ladder is upside down.
No.Are you actually posting from Ponoka?
This person is on your Ignore List.
Originally posted by Xelios
Actually KB, it was tony1 that suggested there were trillions. Maybe you should read the posts harder next time.
Tony, if there was a giant flood there would be one layer of fossiles covering the entire planet containing "trillions of fossiles". If this was the case you would discover fossiles no matter where you dig. Obviously, this is not what happens. Or do you think all the animals came together in large groups in certain areas just before the world flooded?