Hitler and Stalin.As Dr. Phil said, "the best predictor of future behavior is relevant past behavior." Hitler attacked Poland, killed its Jews (and a lot of Poles), and forced them to worship him, "Heil Hitler".
You think.Now, not to go out on a limb here, but I think Hitler would have done the same to Britain given the chance.
It's the only one available since the documents have just been declassified.By the way, citing a book that is supposedly supported by documentary evidence isn't nearly as persausive as the documentary evidence itself.
Then you didn't read correctly did you?You lead me to believe you knew what these documents
They were quoted in the book.were, which I asked you to describe - which you apparently can't or won't.
It is a very well known fact that France/Britain and Germany fought WWI. It is also well known that Hitler took advantage of the poor German economy after WWI to rise to power on a wave of German nationalism. It is also known that Hitler invaded other countries without cause, killed millions, and was generally a sick bastard. Now, how is the U.S. going to manipulate Hitler into starting a war, when Hitler so clearly wanted that war? This historical revisionist nonsense your spouting is insulting to all WWII vets.
A Hitler decided to attack your country, kill your Jews, and force you to worship him.
Why did Japan think America wouldn't fight?
Why did America interfere in Iran, Vietnam, Cuba, Nicaragua, El Salvador, Grenada, Iraq, etc., etc., etc?
Why did Dubya invade Iraq?
Why did America elect Dubya?
Why does America even have the likes of Dubya on the ballot?
This is speculative. Moreover, it doesn't say a thing about FDR wanting a war with Germany, so that the U.S. economy would prosper by selling arms to Britain.
""Roosevelt was a creation of Wall Street [and] an integral part of the New York banking fraternity...."8
The 1932 presidential campaign strategy was very simple: "big business" wanted Roosevelt..."
Big business is like a squid with a tentacle in many pies.
If this is supposed to make you sound more credible and objective, it's not working.
This is speculative. Moreover, it doesn't say a thing about FDR wanting a war with Germany, so that the U.S. economy would prosper by selling arms to Britain.
The US economy did prosper whilst the British economy failed badly but you are correct...the Americans gave us a very fair deal for any help and despite many naysayers it is much to FDR's credit that he stuck to the so-called 'special relationship' between the British and the USA.
Your opinion.Such a maniacal plan was never hatched by FDR.
And of course you won't, ever.I have yet to see any documentary proof of this conspiracy nonsense in any case.
I was hoping, of course, that you had read the book and could tell me what document(s) they are referring to. I am not going to spend money on a book and then spend an enormous amount of time reading that book just because it makes some crackpot claim which is highly unlikely.
So I should pay for the book, read it and then post it here for you?
You say that as if that isn't exactly what you're doing. All we ask is that you post the references the book uses to back up its case, rather than simply reiterating the book's thesis and demanding we buy it.
O.K. Now I know you didn't read the book. Sorry for asking you for information you don't have. I don't blame you for not wanting to buy the book and read it, either.
Wouldn't know the relative prices since I'm a Guinness drinker - quality doesn't come cheap.And yes, I am cheap. Notice my avatar is Budweiser - not Heniken.