Riomacleod
Registered Senior Member
http://msnbc.com/news/764658.asp?pne=msn
Two things bother me about this. First, it bothers me that MSN continues to refer to the man by the name al-Mujahir, instead of Padilla. They thought it was important enough to point out what his (apparently) legal name was, but throughout the piece refer to him in his "Islam" name-a practice I admit to not fully understanding. Either way, is this some sort of sanatation attempt by the news agency? I think that up until now, while we have not understood the causes for hatred and terrorism against the US, we have collectively thought that it was something "over there" and that we were either too refined, or had too much respect for life, or whatever else we needed to tell ourselves such that Americans would not participate in such a thing. Hearing the name Padilla in a list of terrorist names, then would seem to cast a shade of grey on the battlefield, that somehow not every 'normal' person is not a militant, and that not every 'Islamist' is a mad-eyed rabid killer.
Secondly, I can't tell exactly what crime he's commited. that might be why he's being held as an enemy combatant (whatever that means) and kept in a navy brig while the investigation continues, most likely denied due process and access to a lawyer. A front-runner would be conspiracy to commit murder or terrorism, but that would be in a civil court. However, the article makes it sound like he was arrested for knowing how to wire explosives and having knowledge of radiological dispersion devices.
So, now we are arresting our own citizens, and placing them in custody, with the intent of placing him before a military tribunal, as an "enemy combatant". What's next?
Al-Mujahir [Actual name: Jose Padilla] was arrested May 8, as he arrived at Chicago’s O’Hare International Airport on a flight from Pakistan, Ashcroft said. He is in the custody of the Defense Department as an “enemy combatant,” the attorney general said, a move that suggests that al-Mujahir will be tried by a military tribunal.
At a later news conference at the Justice Department, Wolfowitz said al-Mujahir was being held at a Navy brig in Charleston, S.C., after being transferred from federal custody.
Two things bother me about this. First, it bothers me that MSN continues to refer to the man by the name al-Mujahir, instead of Padilla. They thought it was important enough to point out what his (apparently) legal name was, but throughout the piece refer to him in his "Islam" name-a practice I admit to not fully understanding. Either way, is this some sort of sanatation attempt by the news agency? I think that up until now, while we have not understood the causes for hatred and terrorism against the US, we have collectively thought that it was something "over there" and that we were either too refined, or had too much respect for life, or whatever else we needed to tell ourselves such that Americans would not participate in such a thing. Hearing the name Padilla in a list of terrorist names, then would seem to cast a shade of grey on the battlefield, that somehow not every 'normal' person is not a militant, and that not every 'Islamist' is a mad-eyed rabid killer.
Secondly, I can't tell exactly what crime he's commited. that might be why he's being held as an enemy combatant (whatever that means) and kept in a navy brig while the investigation continues, most likely denied due process and access to a lawyer. A front-runner would be conspiracy to commit murder or terrorism, but that would be in a civil court. However, the article makes it sound like he was arrested for knowing how to wire explosives and having knowledge of radiological dispersion devices.
So, now we are arresting our own citizens, and placing them in custody, with the intent of placing him before a military tribunal, as an "enemy combatant". What's next?