UFO's filmed over Yellowstone

This is just regular park surveillance video.
Well, no it isn't. As witnessed by the audio, the text-over, and the careful manipulation of the stop-motion effect to time nicely with the soundtrack, this is a highly processed amateur video clip ... granted, of what was once probably park surveillance video.

It would be nice to see this in a context more serious than what might as well be some editor making a piece for his music-video port folio.
 
Well, no it isn't. As witnessed by the audio, the text-over, and the careful manipulation of the stop-motion effect to time nicely with the soundtrack, this is a highly processed amateur video clip ... granted,of what was once probably park surveillance video.

No..it's still park surveillance video. Stopping it here and there and adding a soundtrack doesn't change that fact.
 
"Another thing that has been swept under the rug by UFOlogists, which is yet another argument against the extraterrestrial hypothesis, is that these objects change shape. In other words, they are not always discs or eggs or cigars. They change shape dynamically.

When I went to the Soviet Union, I met a man named Vladimir Azhazha, who is head of the research committee on UFOs in Moscow. He said, "You know, one of the most important aspects of this whole phenomenon is that it’s polymorphic." I wasn’t sure my interpreter was translating accurately, so I had him repeat that. He said, "It’s polymorphic; they change shapes. An object will appear as a disc and as it’s moving through the sky it will change into a cube or into a pyramid or it will vanish on the spot."

I showed him an article where I had said essentially the same thing. He looked at me and he said, "You know, it’s as if you and I had been working together for the last ten years." This shows something rather remarkable about the phenomenon, which is that two people who have been studying it in earnest in completely different parts of the world under completely different conditions will arrive at the same conclusions about it.

If it changes shape, if it can appear out of nowhere and disappear into nowhere, this is not just a bunch of spacecraft. This is a much more interesting technology that manipulates dimensions. It manipulates space-time.

And if it can do that, then it can be from anywhere and anytime."----- Jacques Vallee...http://www.bibliotecapleyades.net/ciencia/ciencia_vallee03.htm

 
Last edited:
No..it's still park surveillance video. Stopping it here and there and adding a soundtrack doesn't change that fact.
The fact here is that we know conclusively that it has been extensively manipulated.

That doesn't necessarily mean items in the video have been faked, but it definitely torpedoes the source's reliability and the video's quality as any kind of evidence.
 
The fact here is that we know conclusively that it has been extensively manipulated.

That doesn't necessarily mean items in the video have been faked, but it definitely torpedoes the source's reliability and the video's quality as any kind of evidence.

No...it doesn't affect the reliability of the video at all. This video can be found elsewhere without the soundtrack or text. It's the same survelliance video over and over again. And you have no evidence of it being otherwise.
 
No...it doesn't affect the reliability of the video at all.
It has been irrefutably altered.

For starters, it has been enhanced with overlaid text and sound. There is absolutely no question that the clip has been extensively processed.

This video can be found elsewhere without the soundtrack or text. It's the same survelliance video over and over again.
That is what I was hoping for, yes. It's a pity a more believable video wasn't put up here instead.

Why are we watching music video? It doesn't even belong in the UFO forum ,let alne any more stringent forum.

And you have no evidence of it being otherwise.
It has been irrefutably altered.

What I don't have evidence of is just how much it's been altered.
 
It has been irrefutably altered.


That is what I was hoping for, yes. It's a pity a more trustworthy video wasn't put up here instead.

It has been irrefutably altered.

What I don't have evidence of is just how much it's been altered.

No it hasn't been altered. It's the same video with and without the text or soundtrack. And you're right...you have no evidence of it being altered at all. Just making up lies about it won't cut it.

"The video was shared by YouTuber Jeanette Forester, who regularly posts clips of the park – but this is her first UFO sighting and she described the clip as "once in a lifetime"."----http://www.dailystar.co.uk/news/latest-news/541369/UFO-Aliens-Sighting-Yellowstone-Fleet-Area-51-Base-Super-Volcano-US-Government-Video-Clip
 
Last edited:
It's the same video with and without the text or soundtrack.
You have presented no evidence of this. (A lesser man might invoke the term 'liar'. Though it is not a correct use of the term in this thread.)

What you have presented is what I am addressing. And it's extensively altered from ... whatever it was before.

And you're right...you have no evidence of it being altered at all.
MR, you do yourself no favors here. There is no question whatever that this is a manipulated clip. The only question is how much?
 
--
Prove it.

I already posted another clip of it. Can't you see it?


MR, you do yourself no favors here. There is no question whatever that this is a manipulated clip. The only question is how much?

Noone's buying your lies here. You have no evidence the original video has been altered at all. Adding text and soundtrack doesn't alter the video. It's still the exact same video footage.
 
"The video was shared by YouTuber Jeanette Forester, who regularly posts clips of the park – but this is her first UFO sighting and she described the clip as "once in a lifetime"."----http://www.dailystar.co.uk/news/latest-news/541369/UFO-Aliens-Sighting-Yellowstone-Fleet-Area-51-Base-Super-Volcano-US-Government-Video-Clip
This is a better clip.

If you had been a little more diligent, you wouldn't have had to make silly assertions about how an altered video isn't altered.
 
"and she described the clip as "once in a lifetime"."

A strange thing to say. This is footage pulled off a surveillance camera. So, is she, like, the video security manager at Yellowstone?
 
LOL! So admitting you were lying that the video was altered would be too much to expect at this point?
The OP video you posted has been altered. You chose it, you posted it. I addressed it.

If it hadn't been altered then you would have posted a second link to an identical video. It's not - that's why you posted a second one. That act is an extant admission that it is not the same as the first one.

(A lesser man would invoke the term liar here, since your own actions contradict your assertions.)
 
"and she described the clip as "once in a lifetime"."

A strange thing to say. This is footage pulled off a surveillance camera. So, is she, like, the video security manager at Yellowstone?

Yes...so strange to be impressed by video footage of ufos. Who is she? Look her up..I'm not doin your legwork for you.
 
Yes...so strange to be impressed by video footage of ufos. Who is she? Look her up..I'm not doin your legwork for you.
This is your thread. you're supposed to do the legwork, if you don't want to look like a fool.

Now, we're done with this. I'm not here to flame. I'm simply here to comment on the video.
 
Back
Top