anonymous2 said:
In a way, I think you are right. God/gods have been the way to explain what occurs in life, even when Zeus was thought to throw lightning bolts or whatever. Science has found natural explanations for things which used to be assigned to divine power(s), but until science explains everything (which I think will be never), "God" will be the explanation for things we don't know/can't know.
Well, science certainly can dig into the HOW of phenomena, and, depending on the state of technology, the answer to how changes over time (e.g. how an atom is made: at first they thought it is a whole, then found that it is made of particles ...).
What remains elusive is the WHY, as why asks about reason or purpose. If we are to be truly and exclusively scientific, we should not ask any why-questions, actually. Yet people do ask why. Why do people ask why-questions?
anonymous2 said:
Personally, I don't think believing in God is irrational, but if mankind just accepted things we don't know/understand as coming from God, how far would science have gotten?
Scientific development is about how, not about why. As such, science does not interfere with religion.
The only trouble, as I see it, is that in history, the how and the why were treated as one. And this causes the major turmoil when it comes to the science vs. religion dichotomy.
anonymous2 said:
I don't think believing in God, per se, is irrational, but I can't quite seem to stomach the Biblical God.
The "Biblical God" is marked with the story of a certain people, and interpreted in that manner, and also interpreted in the manner that those professing to believe in this God presented this God. So to take what the Bible and Christian history are saying about God to be all there is to say about God, is a hasty generalization and a strawman.
***
SnakeLord said:
That's what debates and discussions are.
Okay.
SnakeLord said:
I suppose the question could be turned around to you. Tell me why you're talking about god to people that don't believe in such a being?
Personally, I am not a member of any organized religion.
It irks me to see people say "I don't believe in God because this is there is no reason to believe in God" and then they go and bash believers, and it later on turns out that the person in question simply hates God and has a distaste for religion. Which is understandable. But why then don't they simply say "I hate God and religionists" -- why *rationalize* this hate into "I don't believe in God because there is no reason to believe in God"??
SnakeLord said:
I mean why bother, we might aswell just all say "you don't think the way I do, there's no point talking about it", and be on our merry way.
But this happens very rarely, does it not?! Why is this so rare?
SnakeLord said:
Forget that, we might aswell just all spend our lives looking at the walls instead of bothering to ever talk to anyone about anything.
Then I'll rephrase: Why do you think that people talk about things? (I know that the question is simple, but please ebar with me.)
SnakeLord said:
If there were a whole bunch of people that said he was real, we would be talking about it.
To children, Santa is very real, and they do talk about him. In fact, the adults are supporting them to believe so, and the whole Christmas industry is set up around believing in Santa. That's a lot of time, money and effort to make someone believe in someting that supposedly doesn't exist. What a trick!
SnakeLord said:
I guess we still can... Tell me, why don't you believe Santa is real? You can't disprove his existence.
Which Santa isn't real? The one whose lap I sat on when I was 4 was very real, or I had nowhere to sit. Sure, a man (whom I otherwise knew) was dressed up as Santa, but what he was *presenting*, what that man dressed up as Santa *meant*, that felt real.
SnakeLord said:
“ If believing in God is as stupid and irrational as believing in Santa, then why do you keep on giving reasons for not believing in God, while you don't go on about why you don't believe in Santa? ”
The world is full of bizarre people that believe in stupid things.
Do you think that children are stupid, for believing in Santa?
***
path said:
Quite simply because the idea and the worship of god has a major impact in our lives whether we believe in god or not.
Interesting. Very interesting.
Why is this so -- why would the idea of believing in God have a major impact in our lives whether we believe in God or not?
Why the major impact for those who believe in God?
Why the major impact for those who don't believe in God?
***
Godless said:
“ To those who don't believe in God, yet are still talking about him ”
Because 99.04% of the population around us are claiming that an entity they can't even provide evidence of its existence or identify what it is, is real.
I suppose they have some reason to do so.
Godless said:
The other .06% population are the ones waiting for some emperical evidence to the others assertions.
Where did you get those numbers?
Godless said:
When your done destroying the earth for your gods, or armagedons, jihads, or what nots, the ones to shine will be the non-believers, we were right after all no one came to save your ass. YOU ARE ALL ALONE!!.
Chances are that those who will be "destroying Earth for their Gods" will be thorough, and nobody will be left to say who was right.