I started watching the video but lost interest early to be honest..perhaps and maybe..then we have a testimony from a guy dieing from a drug overdose, then an account from a guy having a heart attack presumably under anesthetic...how did Eddie know? Maybe he didn't...
In any event it boils down to this... those who want to believe will believe will believe and if you want to believe go ahead it can be your belief if that is what you want...personally I don't believe any of if cause it is based on we don't understand so let's make something up...if there is an afterlife it will happen if not it won't but I see no benefit in speculating ..is there any benefit? But all of this seems to be step one ..we can't explain it, step two there is something going on, step three let's make something up...
What is the point really what is the point...oh another thing prove it will not prove god I expect..further the video is after all entertainment nothing more so perhaps that is the level to deal with it...
Alex
John Cleese is no scientist, as you know, but the scientific method is clearly being used here by scientists to study the evidence and apparent reality of the existence of awareness and life outside of our physical existence.
According to one of the scientists on the panel, there are a number of peer reviewed papers on this topic.
On what basis does one decide to completely reject all of the scientific evidence in favor of Life After Death?