as discussion is commentary feel free to agree or, disagree with revelation of worth.
It is that technological misuse leads to misuse and faulty intelligence creations and commitments.
The above written statement defers into every category of human life presentment mean of error, or discomfort.
The realism that radio/media/voyeurism delegates the above in many mean is and has been a world problem.
the begin of hope to address the matter began with act local, often it is ill behaved literal family confused by it's "fame or professional benefits whom on the side excuse their what became a "lifestyle of "peering beings with "mimic radio beaming delegations& interrogations and so forth, with vast variety mean of human and industrial dynamism.... all that needs to be done is address the means of beings whom have been practicing human networing with "return to wellness by day, ending the means with aggression produces angrier people whom may have actually networked the 911 terror...the idiocracy of blaming and faulting nations or nations people is an idiocracy,, it is human beings of theocratic variety, binking around in computer/radio ."tele_vision land. the major problem is their ease of radio determining innocent beings with dynamic imposed actism and their skitting away only to appear their hurt of chosen lifestyle their denial of dollhousing people their professions and money, risking and opposing presentative integrity daily. the realism is that they profess in their radiomean to believe in 'quiet wars [aspect of enjoying and creating sexxcapades and the figure eights of emotional, and ecowaste involved , as they do persist integrity of being into a continuum of neglect of land and the strength of harmlessness is lost and entitlements of worth are commiserated with intellectual misuse.
As a reader of this, do you actually recognize yourself. can you discern if by your mean of how you participate in life if it is you create debt or worth., it actually is that as humans, we are to seek salvation in basic reason instead of debting others. realistically no matter what a person or network is trying to gain, if people or a person is hurt or disadvantaged gain !cannot be attained./facts are facts.
Just look really since 1974 (or earlier/the eifel tower begin)subtle violences have been at an increase; it's the most popular new "lifestyle...observing and laughing with false naivete (innocence) at literal network delegations of waste and embarrassment enjoying lesser educate presentation or exaggerate and abusing the basic potentiality that can and could principle all means.
for a long time now young people have been using the phrase "legit' needing legitimacy to show up on grander scale and quietly disliking the word 'epic ... watching and liking the temporary distractivity's of media as relative coping, enjoying music as a fleeting love of someplace of substance. it just looks like 'New Day' what the 1970's forward could have given missed and is still far away, due to the false beliefs and excuses for this radiomean/ which delegates above with it's tele_vising territorialism. ?!
It is that technological misuse leads to misuse and faulty intelligence creations and commitments.
The above written statement defers into every category of human life presentment mean of error, or discomfort.
The realism that radio/media/voyeurism delegates the above in many mean is and has been a world problem.
the begin of hope to address the matter began with act local, often it is ill behaved literal family confused by it's "fame or professional benefits whom on the side excuse their what became a "lifestyle of "peering beings with "mimic radio beaming delegations& interrogations and so forth, with vast variety mean of human and industrial dynamism.... all that needs to be done is address the means of beings whom have been practicing human networing with "return to wellness by day, ending the means with aggression produces angrier people whom may have actually networked the 911 terror...the idiocracy of blaming and faulting nations or nations people is an idiocracy,, it is human beings of theocratic variety, binking around in computer/radio ."tele_vision land. the major problem is their ease of radio determining innocent beings with dynamic imposed actism and their skitting away only to appear their hurt of chosen lifestyle their denial of dollhousing people their professions and money, risking and opposing presentative integrity daily. the realism is that they profess in their radiomean to believe in 'quiet wars [aspect of enjoying and creating sexxcapades and the figure eights of emotional, and ecowaste involved , as they do persist integrity of being into a continuum of neglect of land and the strength of harmlessness is lost and entitlements of worth are commiserated with intellectual misuse.
As a reader of this, do you actually recognize yourself. can you discern if by your mean of how you participate in life if it is you create debt or worth., it actually is that as humans, we are to seek salvation in basic reason instead of debting others. realistically no matter what a person or network is trying to gain, if people or a person is hurt or disadvantaged gain !cannot be attained./facts are facts.
Just look really since 1974 (or earlier/the eifel tower begin)subtle violences have been at an increase; it's the most popular new "lifestyle...observing and laughing with false naivete (innocence) at literal network delegations of waste and embarrassment enjoying lesser educate presentation or exaggerate and abusing the basic potentiality that can and could principle all means.
for a long time now young people have been using the phrase "legit' needing legitimacy to show up on grander scale and quietly disliking the word 'epic ... watching and liking the temporary distractivity's of media as relative coping, enjoying music as a fleeting love of someplace of substance. it just looks like 'New Day' what the 1970's forward could have given missed and is still far away, due to the false beliefs and excuses for this radiomean/ which delegates above with it's tele_vising territorialism. ?!