The Theory of Nothing (TON)
‘Nothing’ is nonexistence, the lack of anything, which is, of course, is still different from existence, but seeming to have no other quantity or quality; yet, would this lack of anything be a stable situation, or perhaps more of a lawless realm? Obviously, it is not the state now, but if it were stable, it would have been.
At any rate, we usually dismiss nothing as being able to be any kind of cause, for we feel that nothing begets nothing, yet it always comes back to haunt, for there is really and literally nothing to make the ‘elementals’ of.
It doesn’t help to say that the basic ‘elementals’ were around forever, what ever these are, such as perhaps electrons, positrons, quarks, antiquarks, and photons, because not only are their types very few and particular, but so would be their overall count of their amount, as well as their individual specific particulars such as their form, mass, charge, location, size, matter/antimatter state, and whatever other properties they have.
The above strongly mandates that the ‘elementals’ must be created, for things cannot be already defined and made in their particulars without ever having been made and defined as such in the first place that never was. So, we are again back to the helping of the notion that there is nothing to make the basic stuff out of. Naturally this also precludes stuff being made of smaller stuff all the way down, plus that idea leads to an infinite regress in which all effects would take forever to cascade upward.
(And, no a God was not just sitting around forever, fully formed, for this supposed elemental fellow could not have been more fundamental that the make-up of His system of mind that does thinking, planning, and creating of everything else. The theory of life or consciousness requiring Life or Consciousness behind it goes nowhere, for the proponents have all of the sudden than then all the more would there have to be a higher LIFE or CONSCIOUSNESS behind the proposed Life or Consciousness. There is not even anything to make an electron out of, right off the bat, much less some ultimate complexity of God.)
Support:
Even though this is in the “free thoughts” forum, I offer the support and evidence of a balance of opposites summing to nothing as being the conservation laws, the vacuum fluctuation of the QM emission of particles pairs of opposite polarity of charge and matter/antimatter state, the positive kinetic energy of stuff balancing the negative potential energy of gravity, photons being neutral in charge and therefore their own antiparticle, as well as there being only two stable matter particles, the electron and the proton (and their antiparticles, of course), and that there is nothing to make the basics out of. I could also add that Infinity times Zero must equal unity (One), meaning that our finite realm must lie between the impossibles of complete solidity and total vacuity.
I don’t see any other recourse than nothing as the prime mover, for not only can there be no other cause, but I also note that simpler and simpler states more readily react, combine, and/or go through phase changes, hinting that the simplest state, nothing, must be perfectly unstable, and, indeed, we see nothing nowhere, for all is filled with field. The vacuum fluctuates, and so then it is no longer a true vacuum. Nothing never sleeps, but is always up to something. It could also be said that nothing must be the causeless, eternal and infinite basis, for which it qualifies, it also being the only candidate for the prime mover.
Summary:
Boundless space, overall electric neutrality, and conservation of charge, momentum, and energy leads inexorably to nothingness, really. The zero-equation is the reason the universe is the way it is, the reason why the universe must be the way it is, and the reason why it is. It is the perfect zero-sum equation. All operates with infinite precision.
Zero and infinity, the smallest and the largest, both lead to nonexistence, and so our finite existence cannot be there, but must be at its midpoint. Zero and infinity lead to many problems in algebra and cosmology. They are the same thing: nonexistence.
(The deathly spiral of paradox ever follows the carving of wishes into the stone hollows of religious dogma forever blocked from the allowables. The believing dance grinds to the elemental of that Being who can never be fundamental. All such tales of original stuff made of love end where there’s nothing to make it of, not even quarks. This theory did not set out to disprove God, but it does, for nothing is not the everything of God, but is actually its opposite.)
Next:
Now we can look for more of the balances in the cosmos, as well as how and why the 4th dimension can and must nullify all of existence, but only in the overview, for nothing cannot be or stay as such.
‘Nothing’ is nonexistence, the lack of anything, which is, of course, is still different from existence, but seeming to have no other quantity or quality; yet, would this lack of anything be a stable situation, or perhaps more of a lawless realm? Obviously, it is not the state now, but if it were stable, it would have been.
At any rate, we usually dismiss nothing as being able to be any kind of cause, for we feel that nothing begets nothing, yet it always comes back to haunt, for there is really and literally nothing to make the ‘elementals’ of.
It doesn’t help to say that the basic ‘elementals’ were around forever, what ever these are, such as perhaps electrons, positrons, quarks, antiquarks, and photons, because not only are their types very few and particular, but so would be their overall count of their amount, as well as their individual specific particulars such as their form, mass, charge, location, size, matter/antimatter state, and whatever other properties they have.
The above strongly mandates that the ‘elementals’ must be created, for things cannot be already defined and made in their particulars without ever having been made and defined as such in the first place that never was. So, we are again back to the helping of the notion that there is nothing to make the basic stuff out of. Naturally this also precludes stuff being made of smaller stuff all the way down, plus that idea leads to an infinite regress in which all effects would take forever to cascade upward.
(And, no a God was not just sitting around forever, fully formed, for this supposed elemental fellow could not have been more fundamental that the make-up of His system of mind that does thinking, planning, and creating of everything else. The theory of life or consciousness requiring Life or Consciousness behind it goes nowhere, for the proponents have all of the sudden than then all the more would there have to be a higher LIFE or CONSCIOUSNESS behind the proposed Life or Consciousness. There is not even anything to make an electron out of, right off the bat, much less some ultimate complexity of God.)
Support:
Even though this is in the “free thoughts” forum, I offer the support and evidence of a balance of opposites summing to nothing as being the conservation laws, the vacuum fluctuation of the QM emission of particles pairs of opposite polarity of charge and matter/antimatter state, the positive kinetic energy of stuff balancing the negative potential energy of gravity, photons being neutral in charge and therefore their own antiparticle, as well as there being only two stable matter particles, the electron and the proton (and their antiparticles, of course), and that there is nothing to make the basics out of. I could also add that Infinity times Zero must equal unity (One), meaning that our finite realm must lie between the impossibles of complete solidity and total vacuity.
I don’t see any other recourse than nothing as the prime mover, for not only can there be no other cause, but I also note that simpler and simpler states more readily react, combine, and/or go through phase changes, hinting that the simplest state, nothing, must be perfectly unstable, and, indeed, we see nothing nowhere, for all is filled with field. The vacuum fluctuates, and so then it is no longer a true vacuum. Nothing never sleeps, but is always up to something. It could also be said that nothing must be the causeless, eternal and infinite basis, for which it qualifies, it also being the only candidate for the prime mover.
Summary:
Boundless space, overall electric neutrality, and conservation of charge, momentum, and energy leads inexorably to nothingness, really. The zero-equation is the reason the universe is the way it is, the reason why the universe must be the way it is, and the reason why it is. It is the perfect zero-sum equation. All operates with infinite precision.
Zero and infinity, the smallest and the largest, both lead to nonexistence, and so our finite existence cannot be there, but must be at its midpoint. Zero and infinity lead to many problems in algebra and cosmology. They are the same thing: nonexistence.
(The deathly spiral of paradox ever follows the carving of wishes into the stone hollows of religious dogma forever blocked from the allowables. The believing dance grinds to the elemental of that Being who can never be fundamental. All such tales of original stuff made of love end where there’s nothing to make it of, not even quarks. This theory did not set out to disprove God, but it does, for nothing is not the everything of God, but is actually its opposite.)
Next:
Now we can look for more of the balances in the cosmos, as well as how and why the 4th dimension can and must nullify all of existence, but only in the overview, for nothing cannot be or stay as such.