The Syrian "Revolution": A Farce from Beginning to End

The Guardian poll you cite is from 18 months ago, and it was just one poll conducted in the midst of a war zone. A slim majority of those polled preferred that Assad stay in power, but of those polled, half of them want him to quickly pave the way for political parties and free elections, and Assad's only purpose would be to prevent a civil war in the interim. Maybe Assad didn't like his poll numbers and decided to gas his people back to their senses. As for Obama's approval ratings, I'm sure they'll spike again as soon as the next Republican presidential hopeful says something outlandishly crazy or insensitive and more people remember why they voted for Obama in the first place.

War often increases a leader's popularity.
Particularly if the country is winning.
 
War often increases a leader's popularity.
Particularly if the country is winning.

I think the rebels are in a much stronger position now than they were 18 months ago- that's the whole reason Hezbollah had to go in with large numbers of its own troops- and even Hezbollah is running into increasingly difficult times lately, unless I'm missing something. If you hoped a president could deliver stability long enough for proper elections to boot his ass out, would you continue to hold out hope for him if he keeps promising victory in a matter of months for years on end? If Assad's popularity is really so high as these ancient polls claim, let him call for an immediate ceasefire and national elections, what's he got to lose?
 
If Putin's plan is successful, surely he will get this years Nobel Peace Prize.

Ha! That would definitely be a funny one. He should absolutely get it.

CptBork makes a really nice point I've been worrying about: with Assad not being rendered dead, he could actually have been better entrenched by this. Probably shaking the stick at him and then going back and forth didn't help. A slow buildup to punishment, if I may say in a partisan way, might have rallied support behind him less well.
 
When someone says that to me I say: "I'd rather not know the Devil at all".
In the Assad case, you don't have that choice, assuming you have a TV or read newspapers.
... He (Putin) should absolutely get it....
Yes, Why not? "Future hopes" are all that is required. Obama got one for nothing, but future hopes.
I wonder how many cases of Rum or Vodka he can swap for that?
Putin has severants who keep him well supplied so would not give it away for truck loads.
 
An interesting article from "The New York Times - The Opinion Pages" yesterday.
The subtitle reads : "What Putin Has to Say to Americans About Syria".

I am Posting the link only because I truly believe that all sides should have their say - not because I am some sort of "Commie Sympathizer" or any other "libelous name" that some Posters may choose to accuse me of.

It seems to be a well written article that someone put some earnest thought into and although it does not exactly coincide with my views it does touch on some very topical and seemingly valid points from one of "the other sides of the table".

Whether anyone wishes to click the link or not, it is, at the very least, an interesting read! Link :

http://www.nytimes.com/2013/09/12/o...n-from-russia-on-syria.html?ref=opinion&_r=2&
 
In the Assad case, you don't have that choice, assuming you have a TV or read newspapers.Yes, Why not? "Future hopes" are all that is required. Obama got one for nothing, but future hopes.Putin has severants who keep him well supplied so would not give it away for truck loads.
Oh yes I follow the Syria situation.
If you think Putin would like to go down in history as the first Russian President to have been awarded the Nobel Peace Prize we will be in luck. The Syria crisis will get solved.
 
And probably you won't get the credit.
Still, you know in your own heart that you've saved the world.

I used it on this thread.
http://www.sciforums.com/showthread...opellant-invented-by-me&p=3107258#post3107258
@ Captain Kremmen - I noticed our Stop start is starting to work as well.

Lavrov to Kerry - "Take my word for it"
Kerry to Lavrov - "Its a little to early"

They are on good terms to talk like that to each other. Talk of a political settlement as well.
 
An interesting article from "The New York Times - The Opinion Pages" yesterday.
The subtitle reads : "What Putin Has to Say to Americans About Syria".

I am Posting the link only because I truly believe that all sides should have their say - not because I am some sort of "Commie Sympathizer" or any other "libelous name" that some Posters may choose to accuse me of.

It seems to be a well written article that someone put some earnest thought into and although it does not exactly coincide with my views it does touch on some very topical and seemingly valid points from one of "the other sides of the table".

Whether anyone wishes to click the link or not, it is, at the very least, an interesting read! Link :

http://www.nytimes.com/2013/09/12/o...n-from-russia-on-syria.html?ref=opinion&_r=2&

First of all the Russians aren't the soviets anymore, so no commie sympathizer worries.

What Putin does not say
- I have bases in syria I want to keep.
- I sell weapons to syria so they can keep killing people.
- I have citizens in syria, including
- I just don't like toppling dictators or allowing foreign influence in other countries
 
First of all the Russians aren't the soviets anymore, so no commie sympathizer worries.

What Putin does not say
- I have bases in syria I want to keep.
- I sell weapons to syria so they can keep killing people.
- I have citizens in syria, including
- I just don't like toppling dictators or allowing foreign influence in other countries


ElectricFetus, do you also Post under other names? I only ask because there seems to be more than a few Posters on this Forum that somehow completely "believe" what some sources "say" - yet can only "believe" what another source "does not say".

Personally, I have yet to find a single government source or media outlet source or individual source that states "every completely verifiable actual fact".

Although, paradoxically, there seems to be an abundance of sources that choose to state biased, one-sided, incomplete and, more often than not, completely unsubstantiated and unverified "facts".

At any rate I believe it was once said : "The unspoken word is capital. We can invest it or we can squander it."
- Notebook, 1898 - by Mark Twain
 
ElectricFetus, do you also Post under other names? I only ask because there seems to be more than a few Posters on this Forum that somehow completely "believe" what some sources "say" - yet can only "believe" what another source "does not say".

Personally, I have yet to find a single government source or media outlet source or individual source that states "every completely verifiable actual fact".

Although, paradoxically, there seems to be an abundance of sources that choose to state biased, one-sided, incomplete and, more often than not, completely unsubstantiated and unverified "facts".

At any rate I believe it was once said : "The unspoken word is capital. We can invest it or we can squander it."
- Notebook, 1898 - by Mark Twain

What are you rambling about? At least 3 out of 4 of the things 'Putin does not say' are absolutely verified facts.

We don't discuss this much here, in light of the chemical attacks crisis. But, has anyone been following this?

It's rather frightening. :(

http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/world/2013/09/08/syrian-rebels-take-christian-village/2781763/

Yeah we have been hearing about this kind of stuff for awhile now, you can also find video of rebels beheading people as well, this is why at least I have serious doubts about supporting these people in any way, I can't say what the reasoning is for the rest of america but I suspect its similar and probably one big reason why support for strikes is only a minority.
 
It's a problem. Sooome of the rebels are Islamists, and sooome are not. I don't know how many are, or aren't. If the UN/US wants to solve Assad, they'll have to be dealt with also, and that's where the problem really starts to dig in.
 
It's a problem. Sooome of the rebels are Islamists, and sooome are not. I don't know how many are, or aren't. If the UN/US wants to solve Assad, they'll have to be dealt with also, and that's where the problem really starts to dig in.

Yep! Yep! Read em and weep!
 
It's a problem. Sooome of the rebels are Islamists, and sooome are not. I don't know how many are, or aren't. If the UN/US wants to solve Assad, they'll have to be dealt with also, and that's where the problem really starts to dig in.
Will Russia have the resolve to sort it properly? Fairly? I think this is what Putin said in his letter to the American people that he would see it done fairly.
 
Back
Top