The Star Larvae Hypothesis

[darryl]

The Star Larvae Hypothesis

The hypothesis proposes a teleological model of nature, in which stellar nebulae manufacture bacteria and viruses in their interiors as they cool. Biology evolves within an ontogenetic program that in its entirety.

The Hypothesis:

1.Stars constitute a genus of organism.
2.The stellar life cycle includes a larval phase.
3.Biological life constitutes the larval phase of the stellar life cycle.

The hypothesis presents a teleological model of nature, in which

•
Stellar nebulae manufacture bacteria and viruses in their interiors as they cool.

•
Biology evolves within an ontogenetic program that in its entirety, on- and off-planet, constitutes a generational life cycle of the stellar organism.

•
Technology plays a necessary role in evolution. It enables biological life to emigrate from planets to weightless space.

•
Postplanetary life manufactures the protons needed to create, then metamorphoses into, new stars.

•
A prescient complex of celestial religious motifs expresses humankind’s stellar calling. The star is the human imago.

•
Nature's metabolism encompasses the organic and the inorganic in a continuum of anabolic and catabolic processes

Here is the website:

http://www.starlarvae.org/index.html

I would like to know what you think about some of these ideas.

 

[Neverfly]

So what's the Chrysalis?

In the meantime, I've seen this claim before.

Trust me, you don't want to know what I think about some of these ideas.
Sitchin and Velikovsky, on the other hand, would love you.

 

[origin]

That is probably one of the damn goofiest ideas I have ever heard of. I especially like this part "Postplanetary life manufactures the protons". However, I guess I shouldn't single out just one part - the whole sad mess is well within the "eh duh" regime.

 

[Mazulu]

Well carbonaceous meteorites contain amino acids which are necessary for life.

I found this link, http://www.daviddarling.info/encyclopedia/A/aminospace.html

The first detection of an amino acid in space was made in 1994 when glycine was found in a star-forming region about one light-year across within the molecular cloud known as Sagittarius B2. This discovery adds weight to the idea that some important prebiotic chemicals, including amino acids, form on grains of cosmic dust and are later deposited on the surface of young planets during impacts with comets and asteroids (see cosmic collisions, biological effects ).​

So amino acids are created in a star forming region, not on the star itself.

 

[Gustav]

...as was indicated in the op

The hypothesis proposes a teleological model of nature, in which stellar nebulae manufacture........

 

[Mazulu]

...as was indicated in the op

Stellar nebulae manufacture bacteria and viruses in their interiors as they cool.

Stellar nebulae manufacture amino acids, not bacteria and viruses.

 

[sigurdV]

http://www.starlarvae.org/index.html

I would like to know what you think about some of these ideas.

They have one good point: Life arises in stellar clouds, not on planets.

When first I heard there was organics in Stellar Clouds I immediately realised
how to explain that cellular life existed on earth so soon after it was formed
and why it took several billion years for it to evolve complexity.

 

[Gustav]

Mazulu
you said...

.... not on the star itself.

i pointed out the theory agrees with you thus no cause for dispute

......not bacteria and viruses.

now that is another story

oh
more rigor required with regards to the ascription of quotes please

Stellar nebulae manufacture bacteria and viruses in their interiors as they cool.

i am so not worthy of that gem