The Pope speaks: Muhammad had brought the world only "evil and inhuman" things. !!!!!

Baron Max said:
When a few words, even misspoken words, cause such hatred and violence in the region, something really bad is wrong! No simple words should cause such violence and hatred ...which leads me to believe that it's actually promoted by the leaders of those nations. And that's even worse!

Baron Max


Why is it ok then for leaders of the US to promote hatred of muslim countries?
 
It's not. It's time hypocrasy was made a treasonable crime in every country of the world. None of our so called leaders are fit for purpose sack them all. Business suits and ties as well as robes of light or shaded cloth worn with headwear of any kind are the trappings of those who would lead us astray. False prophets the lot of 'em.
 
Kiwi123 said:
Do you have any evidence of it? (please do not quote AlJazeera).

I see you haven't been following the news for the last few decades.

One simple example:

"You are either with us or against us!"
GW Bush. Apparently an American President.
Polarizing the opinions. There is no middle ground. No room for neutrality.
 
spuriousmonkey, yes do you have any proof in the words of our leadership to prove that we promote hatred of Muslim countries?
 
Buffalo Roam said:
spuriousmonkey, yes do you have any proof in the words of our leadership to prove that we promote hatred of Muslim countries?
Hi buffalo,

I hope you and your family are well

leaders (apart from dictators of the hitler elk)) seldom make these things policy but i imagine what spurious is getting at is that it is in the rhetoric of US leaders

#######
take care zak
 
It obviously shows in the rethoric of the rightwing US form users too.

At one point they were constantly referring muslims to arabs and ragheads. And how we should nuke them.

And how it is ok to kill innocent iraqis to protect american lives (which were not threatened by iraq)

The list is endless.
 
spuriousmonkey said:
It obviously shows in the rethoric of ....

Whenever some accusation can't be proven, we always say, "It obviously shows in the rethoric of........." ...LOL!

Baron Max
 
Baron Max said:
Whenever some accusation can't be proven, we always say, "It obviously shows in the rethoric of........." ...LOL!

Baron Max

Whenever we have nothing to say we say nothing like Baron. And add a LOL.
 
spuriousmonkey said:
Whenever we have nothing to say we say nothing like Baron. And add a LOL.

The big difference, Spurious, is that I'm willing to admit it ...you ain't! :)

Baron Max
 
Kiwi123 said:
Do you have any evidence of it? (please do not quote Al-Jazeera).
So if the source isn't JudeoFascist it's a lie. :rolleyes: Same way here. If it's a story from Christian fundamentalist Fox News it's true. If a story appears elsewhere it's a lie. So you don't believe alJazeera. So what? Does that mean it has no value to anyone else? With the Star of David controlling almost all media in the US the only news that can be trusted has to be out from under that hate filled and violently racist symbol.
 
Genji said:
So if the source isn't JudeoFascist it's a lie. :rolleyes: Same way here. If it's a story from Christian fundamentalist Fox News it's true. If a story appears elsewhere it's a lie. So you don't believe alJazeera. So what? Does that mean it has no value to anyone else? With the Star of David controlling almost all media in the US the only news that can be trusted has to be out from under that hate filled and violently racist symbol.
the only racist here is you.claiming that a jewish consiperacy is controling the us and the world,or most of the world is not only stupid and not based on reality
but it is also so stupid that i cant begin to describe it.
your trusted source al jazeera claimed during the war that hezbollah took out an israeli plain,whuch turned out to be in the end a missile not a plain.
and that is only one example of the biased al jazeera.
i doubt if you even know one fact on the "jedo facist regim" in israel.
do you know how many palestinians are israeli citizens?arabs?
non jews?how many arab parlament members are there in israel?
if the palestinians would won in 48-there wouldnt be a single jew alive they all would be butchered like in 29 in hebron.
 
predator_190 said:
the only racist here is you.claiming that a jewish consiperacy is controling the us and the world,or most of the world is not only stupid and not based on reality
but it is also so stupid that i cant begin to describe it.
your trusted source al jazeera claimed during the war that hezbollah took out an israeli plain,whuch turned out to be in the end a missile not a plain.
and that is only one example of the biased al jazeera.
i doubt if you even know one fact on the "jedo facist regim" in israel.
do you know how many palestinians are israeli citizens?arabs?
non jews?how many arab parlament members are there in israel?
if the palestinians would won in 48-there wouldnt be a single jew alive they all would be butchered like in 29 in hebron.
Hi Predator,

i hope you are well.

i think what genji was getting at was the fact that if some information comes out on fox news or similar then it is ok but if it comes from a liberal source or somethign different to your views (or Kiwis ) in this case then its gotta be proopaganda...

what i understand he is saying is that it works both ways...

In all walks of life there is always 2 sides to the coin.... No one is ever completly blameless in such situations.

############
Take care
zak
 
Zakariya04 said:
Hi Predator,

i hope you are well.

i think what genji was getting at was the fact that if some information comes out on fox news or similar then it is ok but if it comes from a liberal source or somethign different to your views (or Kiwis ) in this case then its gotta be proopaganda...

what i understand he is saying is that it works both ways...

In all walks of life there is always 2 sides to the coin.... No one is ever completly blameless in such situations.

############
Take care
zak
knowing genji and reading hes racisr anti semitic anti zionist posts,i was referring to what hwe implied.biased media is not new to anyone.
 
Back
Top