There's a large basis wanting to impose "Chemical Bounding/sterility" again. It was quite common in the Wild West. Back in the mid-1800's. And, there was an extreme case in the 1990's where someone chemically castrated a child-rapists. These efforts are more common than one may assume.
In literature I keep coming across references to eunuchs back in the harem days being able to have erections and copulate. I know from personal observation that castrated male dogs can do it. Two of my dogs have done it a total of three or four times.
So surgical castration is very probably not the deterrent it's assumed to be.
My question has been repeated and advoided the whole thread. Will everyone ever answer any of these advoided questions?
Your question makes no sense, since, as has been noted, the concept of "the opposite of rape" makes no sense. If you're asking what the opposite of a man raping a woman is, it's a woman raping a man, and you've been given at least one example. A case has been made for considering castration to be the female equivalent of rape, but I don't find it compelling. One of the scenarios for rape is "date rape," and in the most common case the alleged rapist helps the alleged victim get drunk. Men do this to women more than vice versa, but vice versa is by no means unknown. We don't need an analogy, because coercive unwanted intercourse does happen, even if it's not usually physical violence.
Oh and FR did you here about the woman who held a knife to a guys throat and raped him? I wish i could rember what her sentance was because it was a sickening atack and most DEFINITLY wasnt "just another stat rape"
That's one sick little cookie. All she has to do is ask and 99% of us will say, "Sure honey, your place or mine?" as long as she brings condoms. I suppose the knife adds the element of violence to it which is about the only way to put it on a level with male-on-female rape, since the fear, disgust, and sheer unwillingness to have sex with a stranger of the opposite sex that is stereotypical of women simply does not exist in most men.
Even at that she could be in for a big surprise. In many cases the man's eyes will light up and he'll say, "Oh boy! S&M/B&D! I've been a bad little boy! Beat me, whip me, make me write bad checks!"
Sorry, as a child of the 1950s who was sexually repressed and grew up with some very screwed-up ideas because of it, I find it utterly laughable that a boy who has hit puberty--and therefore near his lifetime sexual peak and almost painfully horny almost all of the time--can in any way be "harmed" by a woman volunteering to have sex with him. And that is virtually the only type of encounter for which female-on-male rape has been prosecuted in America.
If it's a teacher and a student, well okay it is a violation of the teacher-pupil relationship; you're not supposed to ever get quite that friendly with your students. So fire her. But don't call her a rapist because in America she'll be put on the "Sexual Offender" list and it will follow her around for the rest of her life. All for making some poor little boy the happiest that he's ever been in his whole life!