You, obviously. I highly doubt you have the innate interest to care for the well being of others. So, why bother with a thread like this unless it's all about you.
People play lottery so they can win big money. Here's how it works. You buy one ticket, and win lots and lots of money.
Yes, they play to win. However, what they are actually doing is losing 99.999999999 cents for every 100 cents they put into the lottery. "Ohhh.. the lottery is the quick and easy way to retire with a load of dough." The people that play it has no direction when it comes to making money. They think getting rich is so easy. It's like saying that I fly my plane to get from Los Angeles, CA to Hawaii just by picking a random vector to fly and use no compass. Sure, it's possible I may one day make it to Hawaii, but I'm more likely to not ever see it. I end up just wasting time, money, and fuel. And if I do ever make it to Hawaii, all the time, money, and effect I expended to get there just makes the overall trip a real drag. Any positive experience I gain while on the island is greatly outweighed by all the negative it took to get there.
Look at this to help demonstrate why the lottery is such a waste.
Say there is a raffle going on... for $1 you can buy a ticket. You buy 1 tickets. Everyone else, combined, buy $99 worth of tickets, which is 99 tickets. The raffle pool is $100.
Now, every raffle happens for a reason... to raise money for a cause, for example. So, from this pool of $100, they may take out $20 to support the little league baseball team. Now, the pool = $80.
The odds of you winning $80 is 1/100.
The odds of you losing money are 1 - 1/100 = 99/100.
Therefore, the expected gain per ticket is (or value, for us statisticians) is $80*1/100 + (-$1)*99/100 = -$0.19.
You lose 19 cents for every dollar you spend. That doesn't sound like much, put if you keep playing the raffle games, any win you make will be wiped out in the long run.
The lottery works the same. But the variables are slightly different. Like, your theoretical expected win could be nonnegative given that the value of the jackpot is big enough... but, you have have these factors working against you: taxes, splitting the pot with other winners, cash option vs. payout option, etc. Taxes are huge... taking about 40%.
Here in Georgia, the lottery players pay full college tuition for about 70% of our college students. Why? Because more money goes into the lottery system than comes out... as I just explained.
Or, better yet.. How about this.
You play the El Hugo Multi-Trillion Dollar Jackpot everyday of the year for 50 years. The ticket is $1 and you buy one ticket everyday. The odds of winning are 1 in 150 million.
The odds of you winning the jackpot ONCE are
$$\[1-\(\
frac{150000000-1}{150000000}\)^{365*50}\]*100 = 0.0122%$$
So in 50 years of playing everyday, it's a safe bet (pun not intended) that you'll never win.
How much money did you spend? $$$1 * 365 *50 = $18,250. That's a lot of waste. You could buy a lot of pussy for that kind of money.
Now, let's assume we invest $1 everyday in mutual funds that average 12% return. In the same time period, you'll have $105,485.80. That's a turnaround of 123,735.80!
And it will happen... every fucking time. Put in $10 a day and you'll be a millionaire.
But...no... you want to hope.. dream. Sounds sort of like the bullshit Obama said to get elected.
What kind of guy would live a happy life if girls didn't find them sexy?
You missed my point, bro.
The point is...
could you live a normal and happy life if no girl ever found you sexually attractive. If they answer is no, you got some issues. The first one that comes to mind is that you don't have enough enough going on in your life. If you had enough going on in your life, women become a bonus in your life. Have you ever seen guys or had male friends that attracted women without the male even trying? Like women just flocked around him... he doesn't use pickup lines or anything. He's a magnet.
That guy, if you were to ask him how, would say he doesn't know. Why? Because he doesn't spend his free time thinking about women and getting in their pants. He's way too busy having a life of meaning. When a woman wants to get to know him (because he's just so damn interesting), he realizes he doesn't need her and hence, doesn't act all needy. She quickly trusts him... and believe me, trust is very sexy. Why? Women crave safetly and security.
When you try to game a woman, she knows it and that is a creepy feeling to her...
As for the rest of your post, what the hell are you
talking about?
How about... you read it again and post which parts you don't understand.
Food and shelter is great. Also growth and learning. But what about the need for intimacy and hot intimate sex?
You totally missed my definition of need. A need is anything we require to sustain life. If we are denied a need, we die.
In the minds of many, getting laid is a life or death situation.
It's not. Stop needing sex. You don't need it to wake up the next morning.
This doesn't men don't peruse it... just stop needing it. Once you stop needing sex, your mind and body are more relaxed when you're around a woman. She'll trust you more... and, as I said, trust is very sexy.
I find it commendable when sex isn't taken so seriously and seen as a fun activity like hitting balls in a cage. And I'm sure the gay guys are just as nice. But what if a person had all the great characteristics of the gay guy? Fun, friendly, interesting, caring, sensitive, kind, good-looking etc. But was completely straight and actually loves vagina? This is what is called Mr. Right. He is a great fun interesting caring person. Not manipulative. But girls never get to see it. All because “There’s just no chemistry. IOW I’m just not sexually attracted to you.” All because straight people who are nice and interesting are framed evil, boring, manipulative, and unattractive. While the hos throw themselves at the manipulative boring ones. No?
First, they gay men. As I said, all men are inheriently fun. We like the big, the spectactular, the load, the rough, the fast, etc. Men are just grown up little boys. When we were little boys, we'd throw snow balls at moving cars, race motorcycles, play pranks on our friends, etc.
Women like fun, and gay men offer all the fun of any man. The only difference between a gay man and a straight man is how we look at women. A gay guy has no intention of fucking her. So, she can trust him and let loose around him.
A straight man, on the other hand, may have intentions of trying to fuck her. A women know this is the case for EVERY straight man. But, there are two kinds of straight men. The first is the straight man that "needs" sex to have a good time. If he isn't going to score with this girl by the end of the night, his life sucks more and he'll move on to the next girl.
Notice what happened there. First, that statement "his life sucks more." This trait in a man is VERY unattractive. A man that women find attractive are those men that do not, and I repeat, DO NOT define their self worth by their success or failures. Also, they don't allow the people in and out of their own life define who they are.
When an attractive man "fails," he sees opportunity to succeed at something...
Look at these situations... here is what an attractive man says:
If he didn't get sex from that girl, cool! Great! I'll make great friends with her and meet her friends. We'll have loads of fun.
If he got fired from his job, cool! Great! Awesome! I now have more time to find a better job and learn new skills!
If his car runs out of gasoline 10 miles from the nearest gas station. LOL! I could use the exercise!
Where's the success in these failures? Networking with more girls, finding a better job and having time for education, and getting some exercise.
Now, look at the statement "he'll move on to the next girl." While there is nothing wrong with meeting woman after woman until you find the one you want, it's a strategy that backfires when your only goal is sex. And women can smell a sex hound from a mile away.
A remember a few years ago at work, a girl told me that it was blatantly obvious all I wanted from the women at work was sex. I didn't talk dirty at work for fear of being written up or fired for sexual harassment. So, how did she know? Because I am a guy? No... because she singled me out from all the other men. She had a hard time explaining, but she said that it was just the way I walked, how I looked at women, what I did when I was talking with women, etc.
Honestly, I don't even know what I was doing... it's all body language.
When I reduced my need for sex, my body language changed dramatically. Women now initiate conversation with me at random. Just the other day I was at the mall and, out of nowhere, this amazingly attractive 20 year old girl sits down at
my table in the seat directly across from me and asked me out.
Given that my viewpoints on women are different from yours and that I have more success in having women approach ME instead of the other way around, I must be more right than you are wrong.
There’s nothing wrong with just wanting to get laid. But notice who the hos are attracted to and who they are repulsed by? Attracted to the ugly losers. Repulsed by the nice person.
The difference between the nice guy and the ugly loser that attracts women is that this ugly loser hasn't intellectualized everything to death and he generally doesn't pussy foot around the issue of sex.
Women don't flock to ugly losers because most of them have NOTHING going for them. They have no money, live with mom, ugly, fat, and unhealthy. Call a man with thse traits Bob. If Bob meets a girl, is genuinely interested in her, and isn't afraid to flirt, he's got a much MUCH better chance of "getting the girl" than the nice guy that comes off as a creep or is too much of a pussy to flirt until it's too late.$$