I have a hypothesis of how time passes. Time passes as three dimensional spinning collapsing spheres. Each larger than the next. Each encapsulating the one before. It is a complete dimensional collapse that collapses into itself and expands outwardly into the next larger three dimensional spinning collapsing sphere. The outwardly expansion interacts with the next collapse. These interactions can cause the two dimensions to break up into packets. Each new three dimensional collapse carries with it more space and energy. This gives the packets of energy room to increase velocity. Because these collapsing spheres are spinning time is relative to which latitude the packets of energy reach. Whatever latitude a packet of energy reaches at the moment of the next collapse it will quantify in to repeat the cycle at the latitude it is in supplied with energy and more space. The latitude the packet of energy is in dictates how frequently it will repeat the cycle. This creates wavelengths. Packets of energy spinning in opposite direction of the spinning collapsing spheres will unravel. Packets with enough velocity can spin out a spinning collapsing sphere's pole and cercumbnavigate along the outside experiencing two spinning collapsing sphere. The one it came from and the next one coming. This creates the first form of entanglement an electron. The more energy it has the farther down it will travel towards the equator taking up more space. Each new spinning collapsing sphere encapsulates the one before making them flow in chronological order. It takes longer to collapse through the entanglement of matter which creates gravity. This separates the hemispheres where matter exists in the lower hemisphere and wavelengths in the upper hemisphere. Wavelengths become more frequent towards the upper hemisphere because there is less space. Matter becomes more dense towards the lower pole because there is less space. There is a physical reason for all things and there are no missing links in the creation of universes.
The Mechanics of Time
- Thread starter Catch22
- Start date
Gawdzilla Sama
Valued Senior Member
No
Zero Point Native
Registered Senior Member
Interesting
exchemist
Valued Senior Member
Why do they spin?
Pinball1970
Valued Senior Member
I concur with your review sir.
Pinball1970
Valued Senior Member
More important where do they come from? They come an infinity of Quantum Macro Foam. Energy in its weakest state. Vibrations occur along the borders which can run into each other and break a cell. Once a cell breaks the void collapses in on itself pulling on the surrounding foam to fill in the void. The void contains energy so it can't be collapsed into nothing. The surrounding foam being pulled into each other is enough to break the surrounding cells and create a larger void that collapses inward. This starts a chain reaction, of collapse and expansion. As more space is introduced expansion velocity increases to the point where the expansion is faster than the collapse and the void is filled back up with foam. It does not resemble the original Quantum Macro Foam the cell sizes are random. All finite progression are on a pathway back to an infinite state. A newly forming chain reaction can run into a universe put back into an infinite state causing it to spin. A spinning chain reaction will last longer as it will increase entanglement. A universe that feeds off Quantum Macro Foam alone will not last as long as a universe that feeds off of universes put back into place and those still in progress.
Pinball1970
Valued Senior Member
No. (G.Sama 2024)
Last edited:
It's the best way to explain the spinning dimensional collapse of each sphere. Instead of spacetime, think of them as spinning collapsing spheres of time, lol. They start out as a universal event encapsulating everything individually as they collapse. The spinning separates time latitude wise. How long it takes to completely collapse is relative to mass or no mass and momentum. The complete collapse creates the present, the now, the point in a point particle. Everything boils down to what is energy? Energy can be divided. It can be potential energy. Its conservation has infinite undertones. Can time exist without energy? Can energy exist without time? Does the universe's zero sum of energy put energy in a infinite state?
Pinball1970
Valued Senior Member
Word salad nonsense.
I replied once already, don't know where it went. It's the best way I can explain it. Instead of it being spacetime, think of it as being spinning collapsing spheres of spacetime, lol. They start out as a universal event encapsulating everything individually as they collapse. The rate of collapse depends on mass, or no mass and momentum. The complete collapse defines the present, the now, the point in a point particle. The question boils down to what is energy? Energy can be divided. Can time exist without energy? Can energy exist without time? Does the conservation of energy imply an infinite state? For potential energy to become energy there must be change. Can the change of a single packet of energy create a universe? Like everything in this universe the beginning must come from the simplest beginning. It must be structured to be able to build upon itself over a period of time. One packet of energy will not do. Here is something on the dynamics of foam. Take note that an infinity of Quantum Macro Foam. Energy in its weakest state, the boarders are not as strong as the Foam posted here. https://www.jmu.edu/news/2011/10/18-foam-for-thought.shtml
And, where are these spheres exactly?
I explained earlier where they come from and they start as a universal event encapsulating everything individually as they collapse. Each new spinning collapsing sphere encapsulates the one before. Each new sphere is larger than the next. Each collapse is a complete three dimensional collapse of energy which is absorbed at different rates according to mass, non mass and momentum. Each new collapse collapses into itself to expands outwardly into the next larger spinning collapsing sphere. Expanding into a larger dimension creates a eccentric orbit effect and also explains the expansion of the Universe. There are two net zero points. One is the center of gravity. The other is the peak of the eccentric orbit. Both of these create weaker fluctuations of energy. An example is the spinning collapsing spheres collapsing around the earth. It takes longer to collapse through matter this creates a delay. The delay creates gravity. Everything creates its own equator in these spinning collapsing dimensions. Matter cones down from the equator its creates to project the delayed collapse in the surrounding space. As the collapse reaches the surface of the planet its starts to collapse around the molecules and atoms individually. They go through the cycle of collapse and expansion as does everything else until the collapse reaches the center of gravity. This net zero place is time stamped because each spinning collapsing sphere encapsulates the one before. The Earth's net zero gravity should have happened way before the net zero gravity of the moon. A wavelength creates its own equator at the latitude it reaches in the upper hemisphere creating an eccentric orbit as it collapses into itself and expands outwardly into a larger dimension. These spinning collapsing spheres tie everything together. Each one larger and carrying more energy than the next explains the acceleration of the expansion of the Universe. The spinning explains what happened to anti matter spinning in the opposite direction. The spinning can also account for quantum loops at different latitudes inside a spinning collapsing sphere. We ourselves are probably in a huge Quantum loop. The proof would be a speed that matter couldn't reach because it's the speed of the quantum loop. Being in such a loop would create dark matter that could not be detected while in the loop. Quantum particles could bounce between these huge Quantum loop and seem like they being created from nothing. I would have been done with this hypothesis a long time ago. I know how crazy it sounds until it doesn't. I can explain how an early universe that has created wavelengths first and then electrons creates a entanglement making machine if anyone is interested. Perpendicular is the key to entanglement. If I misspelled anything I apologize. I've been typing two things at once, with each hand, you know like playing a musical instrument. The difference is the wrong note can ruin a tune, whereas a misspelled word could hardly ruin a hypothesis unless that's the best laid plans of mice and men.
Gawdzilla Sama
Valued Senior Member
No.
I asked you where were these spheres, what evidence do you for their existence. Considering you claim there are new ones, we should be able to observe and measure them. So, where are they?
Catch22:
In which instances do the predictions of your theory differ from those of regular old, non-spherical time? Cna you please give me an example or two?
What does it mean for time to collapse or expand? Does that have any real-world implications? Are there any experimental tests we can do to try to support your "theory"?
Can you please give me a specific example, showing how you calculate the "relativity" of time using your model?
How does this division of "matter" and "wavelengths" translate into real-world observations of matter and such?
Great! What quantitative predictions does your "theory" make?
In which instances do the predictions of your theory differ from those of regular old, non-spherical time? Cna you please give me an example or two?
Is this just a thought bubble, or do you have some maths that predicts this collapsing-then-expanding behavior?
What does it mean for time to collapse or expand? Does that have any real-world implications? Are there any experimental tests we can do to try to support your "theory"?
Can they? Does your maths predict this behaviour?
And this?
If you say so.
What are the real-world implications of time being relative in this way?
Can you please give me a specific example, showing how you calculate the "relativity" of time using your model?
What does "quantify in" mean?
Wavelengths? Did you mean "waves" there? What kind of waves? Can we detect them?
Your maths predicts this behaviour, too?
What is the first form of entanglement of an electron? I am not familiar with that. Please explain.
What are you talking about now - the first form of entanglement of an electron, or your packets of two-dimensional energy?
Wait a minute. You're trying to describe what time is, aren't you? What you need to do, then, is to show how "chronological order" is a concept that follows from your theoretical assumptions. Have you done that?
Does your maths predict that your spinning spheres (or is it the two dimensional packets or the first form of entanglement of an electron?) can become "entangled" with matter? How? Can you show me the maths, please?
When you say "wavelengths", what are you actually talking about? A wavelength is usually a measured distance, for instance between two peaks on a wave. You are using the term in quite a strange way. What do you mean?
How does this division of "matter" and "wavelengths" translate into real-world observations of matter and such?
This is the first time you have mentioned the creation of universes. Seems like a non sequitur.
Is the existence of your Quantum Macro Foam another assumption you're making, or is it derivable from the rest of your model?
Explain to me how energy can have weak or strong states. What do you mean?
Your maths predicts this behaviour?
This is the first time you have mentioned a void. What are you talking about?
Is the void in addition to the time spheres, or it is created by them (or vice versa)? Does your maths predict all this?
What are the real-world implications of this behaviour?
What do you mean when you say "an infinite state"? What is that? A state of what?
How can a reaction run into anything? Please explain. Is this a metaphor of some kind?
Does your maths predict this behaviour?
This is the first time you have mentioned universes "feeding off" things. What do you mean?
Have you calculated the different rates? Can you show me your calculations, please? A sample will suffice.
Does your maths predict the expansion of the universe, then? Can you show me how it does that?
What are you talking about now? What is orbiting what? Which "center of gravity" are you talking about? What do you mean by the "peak" of an eccentric orbit?
Spheres of what, around the Earth? Can we detect those? Why are the around the earth?
Longer compared to what?
Does your maths predict this behaviour?
Everything?
It sure sounds like there's a lot of collapsing going on. Do human minds collapse, sometimes? Has your mind ever collapsed?
What do you mean by "time stamped"?
I'm confused now. In what way is the Earth's or the moon's gravity "net zero". What are you adding up to find the "net" amount, exactly?
Based on what you have written so far, nothing is explained. You're just making a bunch of assertions.
Have you done any math on this stuff at all? Have you fleshed out your theory and derived all these predictions mathematically? Or is all of this just at the stage of imagining how things might possibly work?
Maybe this all makes sense in your head, but so far you've failed to communicate anything that anybody else will find useful.
Maybe go back to the start. Tell us what the postulates of your theory are, and show us how step 1 leads to step 2. Show us your maths. Small steps, one at a time. We'll work our way from the basics up the conclusions about the creation of the universe, the appearance of gravity and all that.
Can you do that? Have you got all this stuff worked out somewhere, other than in your head? Do you have a website or a published scientific paper that develops your ideas?
Great! And your maths predicts the existence of both "quantum loops" and the spinning collapsing spheres, presumably. I want to see the details. Can you show me?
Would be? So you haven't produced any actual proof of this yet, I take it?
Does your maths predict the creation of dark matter?
What is dark matter, exactly? Is your dark matter the same as the dark matter that explains the galactic rotation curves? Have you done any work on that problem?
What kinds of quantum particles? Are you still talking about dark matter?
You've been working on this for a long time, have you? How long, exactly? Days? Months? Years?
Have you got anything substantial you can show me that supports your ideas (e.g. relevant mathematical proofs that show how the theoretical predictions follow from the basic postulates)?
Or is that something you plan on doing later?
The main problem, as I see it, is that all you seem to have done in this thread is to make a bunch of assertions, supported by nothing.
Do you have any actual theoretical support for your ideas (see above, regarding mathematics etc.)?
Does your "theory" make any real-world predictions? Is it testable at all? If not, then it's not scientific.
How about we take it in small steps? Tell me the postulates of your theory and show how this leads to, for example, the creation of "wavelengths" (you'll need to explain what those are) and/or electrons. We can get to how the entanglement happens and why it is important later. That sounds like a more advanced topic.
If you say so. We'll get to that later.
It's okay. I think you're facing bigger hurdles than mere misspellings. Let's see how far you have actually fleshed out your ideas with any meaningful theory.
Last edited:
Moderator note: A large number of off-topic posts on various topics have been moved to a different thread.
Members are reminded that sciforums is not, primarily, a chat forum, although there are a number of threads in which random chat can happen. Please post about the topic. If the topic is "the mechanics of time", discussion of split-brain experiments is unlikely to be relevant, most of the time.
Also, if you only want to post in a thread to tell somebody that you think they are crazy, maybe reconsider whether you should post in that thread at all. Ad hominem attacks - ones that make no reference to the subject matter of the thread - are generally rude and add nothing useful to the discussion.
Members are reminded that sciforums is not, primarily, a chat forum, although there are a number of threads in which random chat can happen. Please post about the topic. If the topic is "the mechanics of time", discussion of split-brain experiments is unlikely to be relevant, most of the time.
Also, if you only want to post in a thread to tell somebody that you think they are crazy, maybe reconsider whether you should post in that thread at all. Ad hominem attacks - ones that make no reference to the subject matter of the thread - are generally rude and add nothing useful to the discussion.
First of let mention this. A Theory of everything isn't going to change everything that has been measured. It's not going to be the greatest equation ever written. It's going to be like switching from the Ptolemy Theory where the Earth was in the center of the universe to the Sun being in the center of the solar system and the Earth rotating on its axis. None of the stars moved in the sky. The planets still did little loops as the passed by the Earth or when the Earth passes by them. It's the concept that's going to change. We may need to switch the tensor force with centrifugal force when it pertains to space as the collapsing spheres are spinning. Every where we look the we can see the effects each spinning collapsing sphere makes. Because it's a collapsing dimension it can be described how the expansion of the Universe is explained. Like being on the surface of a rubber balloon, only the expansion and collapse effects everything. It's the aether that drives wavelengths. Think of being inside of a spinning sphere. As a wavelength, the increase of velocity will move the wavelength up latitude wise inside the spinning sphere. Whatever latitude it reaches at the moment of collapse will become it's equator in each new collapse. That's how things quantify. They quantify at different latitudes because each new collapsing sphere is spinning. The spinning creates different collapsing rates at different latitudes because there are different distances inside of a sphere. Every wavelength is a measurement of the collapse and expansion into each larger spinning collapsing at the latitude that its in. It takes longer to pass through matter and is why there is a separation between hemispheres where wavelengths exist in the upper hemisphere and matter in the lower. It's how the micro and macro can exist in the same domain of a spinning collapsing sphere. Wave time dilation can be thought of measuring these spheres. The acceleration rate of gravity another. It takes longer to collapse through matter. The Earth is in a 32 ft per second delay every second in each new collapse. Electrons spinning in the same direction in zones of a magnet create magnet fields that are spheres inside of spheres. Electrons also create shells in the atomic structure. It's a reoccurring pattern that is happening all around us. The question is does this concept answer more unanswered questions or create more?