The Lesser of Two Evils

(Q)

Encephaloid Martini
Valued Senior Member
"Conservatives, who believe women should be shielded from strange men, say driving will allow a woman to leave home whenever she pleases and go wherever she wishes. Some say it will present her with opportunities to violate Islamic law, such as exposing her eyes while driving or interacting with strange men, like police officers or mechanics.

The driving prohibition has forced families to hire live-in drivers, who, strangely, are allowed to be alone with women. Al-Zulfa said clerics have deemed this a lesser evil than driving."

http://fullcoverage.yahoo.com/s/ap/20050602/ap_on_re_mi_ea/saudi_women_drivers/nc:736

http://news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&u=/ap/saudi_women_behind_the_wheel


Would you agree that this is the lesser of two evils or simply another thinly guised ploy in favor of repression and control?
 
(Q) said:
"Conservatives, who believe women should be shielded from strange men, say driving will allow a woman to leave home whenever she pleases and go wherever she wishes. Some say it will present her with opportunities to violate Islamic law, such as exposing her eyes while driving or interacting with strange men, like police officers or mechanics.

The driving prohibition has forced families to hire live-in drivers, who, strangely, are allowed to be alone with women. Al-Zulfa said clerics have deemed this a lesser evil than driving."

Would you agree that this is the lesser of two evils or simply another thinly guised ploy in favor of repression and control?

Islamic Society does not have the proper understanding of the role of Women. Without the figure of Christ as a model on how to treat women, Islam shall always have distortions, just like the neo-pagans do, who use women for their own pleasures.
 
Islamic Society does not have the proper understanding of the role of Women. Without the figure of Christ as a model on how to treat women, Islam shall always have distortions, just like the neo-pagans do, who use women for their own pleasures.
wow..... that is definitely the most closed minded thing I have heard today.
 
Eh. I just blame it on the Middle East still being stranded in the 13th century.
 
Lawdog said:
Islamic Society does not have the proper understanding of the role of Women. Without the figure of Christ as a model on how to treat women, Islam shall always have distortions, just like the neo-pagans do, who use women for their own pleasures.

Is that what Catholic priests taught you in Sunday School?

"wow..... that is definitely the most closed minded thing I have heard today."
- cato
 
(Q) said:
"Conservatives, who believe women should be shielded from strange men, say driving will allow a woman to leave home whenever she pleases and go wherever she wishes. Some say it will present her with opportunities to violate Islamic law, such as exposing her eyes while driving or interacting with strange men, like police officers or mechanics.

The driving prohibition has forced families to hire live-in drivers, who, strangely, are allowed to be alone with women. Al-Zulfa said clerics have deemed this a lesser evil than driving."

http://fullcoverage.yahoo.com/s/ap/20050602/ap_on_re_mi_ea/saudi_women_drivers/nc:736

http://news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&u=/ap/saudi_women_behind_the_wheel


Would you agree that this is the lesser of two evils or simply another thinly guised ploy in favor of repression and control?

I think that it's the lesser of two human enablers.
 
Back
Top