The Etp Model Has Been Empirically Confirmed

Status
Not open for further replies.
That is one hell of a model he has got there. The model apparently says oil prices will be between $10 and $65!
I have a much, much stronger algorithm than Futilitist has. I predict that oil prices will go up or down in the future by some percentage. I can't tell you what the percentage is, and I can't tell you the direction, because it is a secret. But I am confident that my algorithm will eat the ETP algorithm for breakfast, because it is based on science and math, and those are never wrong. My algorithm will ensure that future generations can sleep confidently in the knowledge that oil prices will go up or down.
 
That is one hell of a model he has got there. The model apparently says oil prices will be between $10 and $65! Hard to be wrong with that range.

I have a model of the weather. The predictive power rivals what meteorologist can do today; they cannot even predict accurately the weather more than 10 - 15 days out. My model can tell you the weather of any day in the next year! For instance, in my area on July 13 the high will be between 50F and 105F. That is not all, it also predicts that it will either rain or not rain. :)
Or hail or not hail or get wiped out by tornado or not get wiped out by tornado. Great model.
 
US oil production not dropping fast enough to ease supply glut:
Even though OPEC has been drowning the world in oil, the U.S. pumped a near-record 9.18 million barrels per day in January, according to recent stats released by the U.S. Energy Information Administration.

That's down a miniscule 0.6% from the end of 2015 and is actually slower than the pace of U.S. monthly production declines that started last year.

In other words, America's incredibly resilient oil boom has not tapped on the brakes hard enough yet to fix that epic global supply glut that has caused crude to crash as much as 75% over the past two years.

"The pace of declines have been tortuously slow," said Tom Kloza, global head of energy analysis at the Oil Price Information Service.

Many, including OPEC, expected U.S. production would crumble as oil prices declined sharply. The oil cartel, led by Saudi Arabia, shocked the world in November 2014 by continuing to pump aggressively in the face of oversupply. The thinking was that strong OPEC production wouldpressure producers in the U.S. and elsewhere that need higher prices to turn a profit.....

U.S. oil production peaked in April 2015 at 9.69 million barrels per day. Yes, it has come down in the months since then, but only by a modest 5%.

"Oh my gosh, it's been incredibly resilient. It's been a much slower pace of declines than anybody projected," said Matt Smith, director of commodity research at ClipperData, which tracks global shipments.
http://money.cnn.com/2016/04/06/investing/us-oil-production-decline-eia/index.html
 
CNN slants the exact same news to suit any argument. The story you picked blames the Saudis for the glut. Here is one that puts the blame squarely on US fracking:

http://money.cnn.com/2016/03/24/investing/fracking-shale-oil-boom/?iid=EL

The rise of fracking has reshaped the global energy landscape.

It recently hit a new milestone in the U.S. Fracking now accounts for more than half of all U.S. oil output, according to the Energy Information Administration. It's a stunning feat considering fracking made up less than 2% of American oil production in 2000.

Hydraulic fracturing technology, more commonly known as "fracking," paved the way for drilling into America's enormous shale deposits. It has fueled a dramatic boom in U.S. oil production.

Back in 2000, there were just 23,000 fracking wells pumping about 102,000 barrels of oil a day. Now there are 300,000 fracking wells, churning out 4.3 million barrels per day.

Fracking "has allowed the United States to increase its oil production faster than at any time in its history," the EIA said in recent report.

U.S. output has nearly doubled over the past decade and America only trails Saudi Arabia and Russia globally.

That surge in American crude is one of the main reasons why there is a global glut in oil that keeps getting worse. The excess supply caused oil prices to peak in mid-2014 and crash as much as 75% since then.

"Prices are where they are because shale has been so phenomenally successful. It's changed the whole pricing paradigm," said Tamar Essner, director of Nasdaq's energy team.

------------

And what is your point anyway, Russ? It doesn't matter who started the glut. The real issue is that it isn't ending any time soon. That means lower oil prices, and that is not good news.

But it is totally consistent with my forecast! :)

Didn't you say that oil would be around $90 a barrel by now?



---Futilitist:cool:
 
Last edited:
It doesn't matter who started the glut. The real issue is that it isn't ending any time soon. That means lower oil prices, and that is not good news.
actually no, what it actually means is that you have no experience in global economics and are simply just spewing an abundance of pretending, fictitious, knowledge.

But it is totally consistent with my forecast! :) Didn't you say that oil would be around $90 a barrel by now?
comical--except the reality is clearly displayed and not your institutionalized delusions of such.
 
CNN slants the exact same news to suit any argument. The story you picked blames the Saudis for the glut. Here is one that puts the blame squarely on US fracking:

http://money.cnn.com/2016/03/24/investing/fracking-shale-oil-boom/?iid=EL

The rise of fracking has reshaped the global energy landscape.
Those articles do not contradict each other, you just aren't understanding what you are reading. I've explained it before, but you didn't listen then and you won't listen now:
Fracking caused the initial supply glut. Up until 2014, OPEC regulated production to keep prices high. They stopped, so prices fell. They hoped and most analysts expected that fracking would slow down rapidly and prices would rise again. They haven't.
 
Those articles do not contradict each other, you just aren't understanding what you are reading. I've explained it before, but you didn't listen then and you won't listen now:
Fracking caused the initial supply glut. Up until 2014, OPEC regulated production to keep prices high. They stopped, so prices fell. They hoped and most analysts expected that fracking would slow down rapidly and prices would rise again. They haven't.
Oh, I get it now. That's your lame excuse for your lame prediction. Yes, you and most analysts were wrong. But I was right. :)



---Futilitist:cool:
 
Of course you were. :rolleyes: A most excellent apocalypse this has been so far. I hope it keeps getting worse and worse!
Well, since there is no end in sight for the oil glut, and since low oil prices are very bad for the economy, I think you will definitely get what you hope for. :)



---Futilitist:cool:
 
"It was affordable at $100 and will be again at 100."
~Russ_Watters
Jan. 19 2016

When do you figure that will happen, Russ?



---Futilitist:cool:
 
"It was affordable at $100 and will be again at 100."
~Russ_Watters
Jan. 19 2016

When do you figure that will happen, Russ?



---Futilitist:cool:

Only a fool would attempt to predict the geopolitics that will ultimately determine that.

But I think it is great that you are now talking at least in terms of current low prices being caused by a glut of oil - whether due to the .Saudis, the Iranians or the US. That is progress.
 
Only a fool would attempt to predict the geopolitics that will ultimately determine that.
Geopolitics are irrelevant when it comes to forecasting the future price of oil. That is why I am relying on thermodynamics, instead. Based on the second law of thermodynamics, the Etp model forecasts that the yearly average price of oil will fall to around $11 a barrel by 2021.

Though the price of oil is largely determined by the laws of physics, not geopolitics, the economic dilemma of a continuously falling oil price will be the cause of great geopolitical chaos, which will likely just make things a lot worse than even the Etp forecast would indicate. This is a positive feedback of collapse.

But I think it is great that you are now talking at least in terms of current low prices being caused by a glut of oil - whether due to the .Saudis, the Iranians or the US. That is progress.
I have been saying all along that we are having an oil glut! I have been consistently saying the same thing since beginning of this thread, and you know it. Quit trying to start over on every page to fake out the readers. It is very intellectually dishonest. And there is a trail of 65 pages of your crap, so if the readers were to look, they would see that you are obviously just faking. How much do you get paid to do this?



---Futilitist:cool:
 
Last edited:
Geopolitics are irrelevant when it comes to forecasting the future price of oil. That is why I am relying on thermodynamics, instead. Based on the second law of thermodynamics, the Etp model forecasts that the yearly average price of oil will fall to around $11 a barrel by 2021.

Though the price of oil is largely determined by the laws of physics, not geopolitics, the economic dilemma of a continuously falling oil price will be the cause of great geopolitical chaos, which will likely just make things a lot worse than even the Etp forecast would indicate. This is a positive feedback of collapse.


I have been saying all along that we are having an oil glut! I have been consistently saying the same thing since beginning of this thread, and you know it. Quit trying to start over on every page to fake out the readers. It is very intellectually dishonest. And there is a trail of 65 pages of your crap, so if the readers were to look, they would see that you are obviously just faking. How much do you get paid to do this?



---Futilitist:cool:

But, but, but......... what about nested control volumes? Surely they come into it somewhere, don't they?
 
Oh, I get it now. That's your lame excuse for your lame prediction. Yes, you and most analysts were wrong. But I was right. :)
---Futilitist:cool:
I don't know, it sure seems like you weren't right when you confidently proclaimed this.
You sound like you almost believe that. Well, I guess this is goodbye then, since we'll obviously never see each other again, because oil prices are only going down. :(
---Futilitist:cool:
I wondered how you would react to being wrong, yet again. I guess it should come as no surprise that you have decided that you will ignore reality and just continue to claim that you are always right.

By the way anyone with more than half a brain knows that we are going to run out of oil. What we disagree with is your idea that the fall of civilization is within months of happening (which you have been saying for years) and your trust in the EPT 'model' (which is complete crap).
 
And there is a trail of 65 pages of your crap, so if the readers were to look, they would see that you are obviously just faking. How much do you get paid to do this?
Oh boy! We get to go down woo-woo lane to the land of conspiracy theories now.....
 
Well, since there is no end in sight for the oil glut, and since low oil prices are very bad for the economy, I think you will definitely get what you hope for. :)



---Futilitist:cool:
hilarious--you are endlessly showing how you, clearly, do not have a clue of how typical this scenario is and how often it has happened over decades of time.
 
the Etp model forecasts that the yearly average price of oil will fall to around $11 a barrel by 2021.
hmm odd-- this ETP(which has collapsed functions from the beginning) forecast has changed(which can be easily linked to show this change)-- how typical..
:) (shakes head)
I have been saying all along that we are having an oil glut! I have been consistently saying the same thing since beginning of this thread, and you know it.
comical--except anyone can easily link what you actually said and not this fictitious, manipulation, attempt that you are stating now.
Quit trying to start over on every page to fake out the readers.
this is odd--simply because i just caught you doing this exact conduct, with this exact post i am quoting.
It is very intellectually dishonest.
yes-yes-- we all already know that you are--as everyone has clearly stated this about you.
so if the readers were to look, they would OBVIOUSLY see that you I are AM obviously just faking.
i had to correct your sentence to the actual reality.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top