It's a fascinating case that still requires a good explanation Wikipedia Dyatlov Pass incident and Dyatlov Pass Questions and Answers
No it isn't. I don't think aliens (if they existed) would act in such a basic way. I've always imagined them to be superintelligent and wise.Obviously, it's aliens. That's what you want to hear right?!
Why? Just because if they came to Earth they'd have interstellar technology doesn't make them wise or super intelligent. People use gadgets whose workings they don't understand every day. Owning a car doesn't make you wise and if a population were able to buy space-craft like we buy cars then you'd have plenty of idiots flying about in space.I've always imagined them to be superintelligent and wise.
So what's your answer to the Dyatlov Pass incident then?Why? Just because if they came to Earth they'd have interstellar technology doesn't make them wise or super intelligent. People use gadgets whose workings they don't understand every day. Owning a car doesn't make you wise and if a population were able to buy space-craft like we buy cars then you'd have plenty of idiots flying about in space.
Why assume another race would be kind and wise when the only known example we have, us, is quite often neither.
Cop out then. Why don't you tackle the applehead mainstream assumption of 'Chaos into Order' and not 'Order into Chaos' thread. You're a standard model apologist, so this should be more in your scope of vision.Why do I have to have an answer for something I know nothing about? I'm not going to jump to conclusions simply because you demand an answer. If anything its infinitely more rational for me not to claim to have any answer at all since I have no information about the incident. All you do is jump to the most ridiculous and stupid answers you can possibly think of. I don't need to have an answer to point ot your answer, claims and guesses are just plain stupid.
How is it a cop out when I never claimed to have an explanation.Cop out then.
This might surprise you but I have other things in science I need to be doing. Unlike you my activities in science don't involve making stupid claims on an internet forum without evidence or logic. Nor is my work the sum of my forum posts. Besides, I really don't think its worth the effort to spend time explaining thermodynamics to you. You claim you have done an astronomy degree and you don't even know orbital mechanics so I think something else taught in physics degrees is going to be even further out of your ability to understand.Why don't you tackle the applehead mainstream assumption of 'Chaos into Order' and not 'Order into Chaos' thread.
Yes, that damn standard model which has lead to the computer you're using right now, the telecommunications you use every day, the GPS route finders in your car, the MRI machine doctor use and everything in between. That standard model really does need apologists!You're a standard model apologist, so this should be more in your scope of vision.