It's hard to find a reference for your bullshit. Maybe you can repost the one on 'fields as particles'?
The double solution theory, a new interpretation of Wave Mechanics
- Thread starter cav755
- Start date
It's hard to find a reference for your bullshit. Maybe you can repost the one on 'fields as particles'?
Dude thinks he can hide the nonsense behind righteous indignation. The 'sure thing is' he was coming back. Talking down to everybody like the illiterate mathematical troll.
Exactly. LOL.
Then I am worried about the type of people I am talking to, especially if you can't do a simple google search on Hermitian matrices or observables.
Troll is what troll does I suppose.
All this talk about how time separates events... when really there is no such order in events in relativity. A moving observer and a stationary observer can never absolutely say whether events are simultaneous or not. This is quite a huge understanding and is important to this discussion; to understand that events are not separated in time at all is the same as understanding the fact there is only one time ever in existence and that is an eternal present moment. Nothing exists in the ''past'' and nothing ''exists'' in the future and therefore nothing can be ''separated'' in time.
You appear to be making that up. The facts are with regards to time, is that we have no Universal "NOW"
Which means they certainly are separated in time.
Of course the finite constant speed of light also governs that fact.
I ''appear?''
How do you know what appears to be made up when you haven't clearly read anything to support it: Check on the Simultaneity of events in relativity, you'll find that moving and stationary observers don't always agree when things happen. Also, when you are at it, check out Einstein's understanding of his own theory, in which there is no past or future.
... and so if events can't always be agreed on and there is no such thing as past or future, just how Einstein intended his theory to postulate, then you can see, you can't properly talk about events separated in ''time.'' There is no such thing in relativity.
Right: which is false. The double slit experiment does not require an aether.
Then explain what occurs physically in nature in a double slit experiment. How does the particle exist in both slits simultaneously? If you perform a double slit experiment with a C60 molecule and it exists in both slits simultaneously and you place detectors in both slits why don't you detect 40 atoms in one slit and 20 in the other? If the particle does not exist in both slits simultaneously how is it moving between the slits so quickly as to be able to "interfere with itself" upon exiting the slits?
Call it whatever you want, superfluid physical vacuum, quantum vacuum, quantum foam, plenum, quintessence, aether, ether, hidden medium it doesn't matter, it is what waves in a double slit experiment.
OK, I'll call it the medium of space, and I'll refer to photons, as well as all particles, as wave-particles with waves associated with their particle presence. If there is any truth to that hypothesis, then the particle goes through only one slit, and the wave associated with the particle goes through both, causing interference. If you change the path of the particle in the apparatus, the particle can encounter its own associated wave, which traverses the apparatus spherically at the speed of light. On that basis, bending the path of the particle with mirrors or splitters allows the wave to catch up and pass its particle, causing an interference pattern as well. Does that sound right, at all? It is just an hypothesis.
Don't worry because your most recent incarnation [blackholey] won't be around for much longer. Then you get to think up another sock puppet handle. Something you seem to enjoy Reiku.
The wave exits the slits and creates wave interference. As the particle exits a slit the direction it travels is altered by the wave interference. If you strongly detect the particle exiting a single slit it destroys the cohesion between the particle and its associated wave and the particle continues on the trajectory it was traveling.
This is what I think is occurring in a so called "delayed choice quantum eraser experiment".
When the red and blue paths are combined the waves traveling both paths create wave interference which causes the particle to create an interference pattern when detected at D1 and D2. There are no interference patterns at D3 and D4 because there is only the single path to the detector so the particle's associated pilot wave has nothing to interfere with.
If the particle is a photon, it travels at the speed of light, and so its associated trailing wave in the medium would always trail it. But if you bend the path of the photon particle, the trailing wave catches up, or so I hypothesize. In regard to the wave and the particle being out of phase, Correct. It is out of phase, and therefore an interference pattern is detected. In phase waves would not show interference, would they?
I missed what you were saying in the second part of your post in #171. See my updated #172 response. http://www.sciforums.com/showthread...ve-Mechanics&p=3179463&viewfull=1#post3179463
Thanks for that diagram and explanation. I will look it over in regard to my hypothesis of wave-particle duality, to see if my hypothesis makes sense in the light of the delayed choice quantum eraser experiment.The wave exits the slits and creates wave interference. As the particle exits a slit the direction it travels is altered by the wave interference. If you strongly detect the particle exiting a single slit it destroys the cohesion between the particle and its associated wave and the particle continues on the trajectory it was traveling.
This is what I think is occurring in a so called "delayed choice quantum eraser experiment".
When the red and blue paths are combined the waves traveling both paths create wave interference which causes the particle to create an interference pattern when detected at D1 and D2. There are no interference patterns at D3 and D4 because there is only the single path to the detector so the particle's associated pilot wave has nothing to interfere with.
'A de Broglie is correct experiment'
http://www.quora.com/Mike-Cavedon/Posts/A-de-Broglie-is-correct-experiment
Interesting link, thanks, I'll try to understand your point. How long it takes me is a variable; is there a dead line?
I would say I am into it for 14 years so far. But I'm old, so I'll have to get to it. I've been leaning toward the hidden variables interpretation that you are so adamant against. I'll have to see if pilot waves can be the answer, but I did look at the interpretation before and it didn't seem consistent with other things I have been invoking. But the answer is out there, so I keep looking and hypothesizing. It is hard to get any intelligent discussion because everyone is so much smarter than me when they are on line.I've been at this for 30 years, so the only dead line is before I'm dead.