The double solution theory, a new interpretation of Wave Mechanics
- Thread starter cav755
- Start date
You are Reiku then.
Oh, no, no more cut and paste. Just tell it.
By all means, explain. I'm all ears.
Who's this we?
Well, I was kind of hoping that the posters here would have enough brain capacity to check my statements out and confirm it to themselves. You know?
Or maybe you don't know ''how'' to varify my claims.
1. Go to google
2. Google ''observable physics wiki''
3. Go to observable's page, read about observable's.
4. Google ''Hermitian Matrix wiki'' for further reading on real Eigenstates.
and you are done. That's how you do it.
So what do eigenstates have to do with time?
It's better to ask I suppose...
... eigenstates represent real physical systems. In physics, things which we can measure, the results of these are real eigenstates; in other words, things which are measurable in physics are given by Hermitian Matrices.
When someone says we measure ''time'' I want to know in what sense, because there is no physical existence of time at all; unless you want to redefine time as entropy, in which case, be my guest.
Time is what separates events. If you think it smart to say changes are what separates events, then you are being pedantic in the extreme.
Entropy also naturally is associated with time and change.
But commonly we refer to it as time.
Also remembering that time also has an inexorable link with space.....
So more correctly, we refer to it as space/time.
What assertions? Be specific. I am sure it is there.
If you are talking about time and it not being an observable, that's common knowledge. We know what constitutes observables in physics... I am sure you can find a list of them on the internet if you cared to bother.
Correct, in a double slit experiment, the particle travels a well defined path whether we detect it or not.
If you perform a boat double slit experiment you understand the boat travels through a single slit and the bow wave passes through both whether you close your eyes or not.
Same for a double slit experiment. The particle travels a well defined path through a single slit and the associated aether displacement wave passes through both whether you detect the particle or not.
No, it's the hard and honest facts. You can't provide any evidence that time separates events, whilst there is an abundance of evidence that changes separate events.
Please stop flapping your fanboy 'me too!' butt again and just read post #138. It's not abstraction 'time' at all, it's real 'space' that separates universal localities/events. You poor insensible 'me too!' scifi fan 'believer' dill. Sheesh.
Time passes, and has ever since the BB. We do not need clocks to make time happen, or to measure it passing. Even in a non expanding Universe, time still passes.
Again that all important link with space gives it more in depth reality.
A reality that is affected by the mass within by curving, warping and/or twisting...A reality that has been effectively measured.
What has all your philosophical only mumbo-jumbo 'impressions and beliefs' to do with the observable reality in flat space to infinite extent that does NOT 'need' any BBang 'beginnings' OR any Inflation hypothesis to account for infinitely flat universal space that Ocam's Razor STARTS with and the latest Sean Carrol observations/tests show is correct since no 'BBang 'beginning' process can EVER REACH infinite extent if the abstract philosophical 'time' is STILL GOING as you fantasize?
Face it, the beliefs and hypotheses have been lately found to be flawed seriously from the get-go; even mainstreamers are catching on to that and looking ever more closely at the latest 'mainstream BS BB/Inflation etc papers' and finding the systemic, assumptive and procedural flaws I did.
You poor ignorant clown haven't a clue, and yet you dismiss even Penrose and Einstein as 'being wrong'. You sorry piece of 'me too!' embarrassment to all concerned on both 'sides' of discussions. Your poor wifey, when she reads in the future what you have been doing on the net.
No that's a false assumption on your part among all your other false assumptions.
A querie you can help me with though.
How do you manage to spend all day on a forum, when even I as a retired man, cannot do that.
What about your ToE?
Or do you now admit that was a lie?
Thank you linesmen, thank you ballboys.
cue: More personal insults, more silly claims, more ranting, more raving, more delusions of grandeur, more, more, more....
That’s been YOUR MO since you lobbed. How thick and insensible of your own actions are you?No that's a false assumption on your part among all your other false assumptions.
A querie you can help me with though.
How do you manage to spend all day on a forum, when even I as a retired man, cannot do that.
What about your ToE?
Or do you now admit that was a lie?
Thank you linesmen, thank you ballboys.
cue: More personal insults, more silly claims, more ranting, more raving, more delusions of grandeur, more, more, more....
Haven't you been keeping up with the science news in cosmology at all lately? No wonder you're ignorant and continue your 'me too!' and cheerleading for 'peer review' BBang totally suspect BS from 'reputable sources' which are nothing like, as the 'systemic 'peer review system' SERIOUS LONGSTANDING FAILURES have proven. Only poor out-of-touch-with-news-and-reality insensible saps like you could STILL be so silly and embarrassing both 'sides' here in discussions. Quit while you still have your "Santa Claus is real" delusions, mate. Reality and Karma can be brutal to such feebleminded 'believers' like you have demonstrated to be and nothing more than that. Sad.
Plenty of observational evidence everywhere at every instant of time and has been since the BB..
You must be misunderstanding me... I don't mean the abstraction we use mathematically. I want to see some real world evidence of it. Something we can actually measure. If you can provide something, it would be extraordinary.
Wow you sound just like the banned member Reiku and his many sock puppets. What a coincidence.