The death of "Modern Physics". Prepair it's funeral!

You lost me upon claiming "absolute position". What a silly notion with no evidence to support it. The very idea of position is intrisically relative in the context of nature. Point A is meaningless without some other point to compare it to, and you can never know if both points are in motion relative to something else.
 
Ho hum. Another "revolutionary" theory.

Can you give us a quick summary of your theory's major results, please?

Also, can you suggest an experiment which could prove your theory false, potentially?

Thanks.
 
Holy shit! We have a revolutionary breakthrough here. This journal is going to be famous for publishing this - all hail geocities, the new journalistic hotness in the scientific community.
 
ok, why on earth would you believe anything you get from a geocites site?
 
Am I reading this thing right? In one section he states that E/M radiation propagates at c+source velocity and in another E/M is action at a distance. (Instantaneous). :m: :confused: :bugeye:
 
I tend to consider proof as proof. "The experiment as a proof" what the fuck does that mean? That comming up with an experiment counts as proof?

And by the way, the 6.4 section was the shortest experiment description i have ever seen. Perhaps i should try something similar in my documents, instead of actually writing what i want to say i simply link to another section which in turn links to another section. :p
 
James R said:
Also, can you suggest an experiment which could prove your theory false, potentially?
Click to expand...
On a sidenote, I'm amazed at the amount of people who fail to grasp this notion.
 
funkstar said:
On a sidenote, I'm amazed at the amount of people who fail to grasp this notion.
Click to expand...
On a sidenote, I'm amazed at the amount of you who fail to grasp what is and is not a proof of length contraction. ;)
 
Hey martillo, that appears to be the same 'new light in physics' that has already been debunked in other forums.

Do you want it debunked here too?
 
Debunked???
Where? I didn't see it!

Hearing at all of you I can understand how a Physic's LIE can survive for 100 years.

You really don't take Physics seriously. You don't worry about what is RIGHT and what is WRONG. You really don't care about the truth. You simply read, memorize and repeat every wroten thing in every "pretty book" and behaves as you know it all (in a sarcastic style of course).

That's why Physics is at the state it is.
 
Last edited:
wesmorris,

You lost me upon claiming "absolute position". What a silly notion with no evidence to support it. The very idea of position is intrisically relative in the context of nature. Point A is meaningless without some other point to compare it to, and you can never know if both points are in motion relative to something else.
Click to expand...

The notion of absolute position have sense when we think in the place of things in the Universe. It's relative to an absolute frame of the Universe. Is not the relative distance between objects.
 
Debunked???
Where? I didn't see it!

You saw it, you ignored it.
 
martillo said:
wesmorris,

The notion of absolute position have sense when we think in the place of things in the Universe.
Click to expand...

I obviously disagree.

It's relative to an absolute frame of the Universe. Is not the relative distance between objects.
Click to expand...

*sigh*

There is no evidence of an "absolute frame of the universe". Even if you had that evidence, how do you know it's not moving in relation to something else?

You're missing the point, but that's okay. Other posters have much more relevant criticisms. I'm out of here.
 
wesmorris said:
You lost me upon claiming "absolute position". What a silly notion with no evidence to support it. The very idea of position is intrisically relative in the context of nature. Point A is meaningless without some other point to compare it to, and you can never know if both points are in motion relative to something else.
Click to expand...
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top