The central science

Status
Not open for further replies.
To save readers some time: the above link discusses a classification schema in which chemistry is given the status of "the central science".
I’m here to discuss how my idea idea is different than the central science.
What's your idea on this?
I propose a gauge to judge our universe upon.
Error. Sentence does not compute. Please re-enter.
 
I propose a gauge to judge our universe upon.
Here it is! Looks like at least these two galaxies are a solid 7.

iu
 
Well let’s see. If I can get it to show up on radar then 99.9 % of what I truly know about it is true.
 
Well, so far it's taken us to the Moon, which is cool.
Well you have a great idea here driven by a complete idiot.

this thread is about how all elements are different from the central science.

so far we have learned I’m a complete idiot for reasons we don’t know for sure. But the interactions are priceless.
 
The question "how are all elements different from chemistry" is sort of a nonsensical question. Like asking how gravity is different from physics.
No. Chemistry is the study of the elements. Physics includes the study of gravity.

but I’m glad you can assess the question here.

chemistry seeks to understand all the elements: the elements do not seek to understand anything.
 
Beaconator has had a chance to explain his point, if there was one. As far as I can tell, his own contrary "idea" about chemistry has not been forthcoming, so there seems little point in keeping this thread open. Closed.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top