For starters, the “diplomat” was Chechen and not Turkish as you alleged. Two, he was an “honorary” consul. Do you know what honorary means? Three, there is no indication in the article you referenced that The United States was involved. In fact, the article you referenced placed the blame on fellow Chechens.
Here in Sweden, people are educated to question authorities, maybe that's something you Americans should take after. The authorities don't like this of course, only minor questioning in matters that matters not are allowed, but nevertheless, it's an embedded feature in the Swedish culture.
You don’t think Americans question their government? You don’t get out much do you? Two, you don’t need to teach me about Swedish culture. My ancestors immigrated from Sweden to The United States. And I can tell you , you don’t speak for all Sweds. Most Sweds are well informed and reasonable folks.
Let me tell you a little about how the brain works. Unless you were there, present at the site and saw everything with your own eyes and felt confident you could trust you vision at the moment, only then can you be "sure" of what actually happened, and not even then to 100%. And for all of those people who weren't present at the actual palce and time of the happening can only trust and distrust what they are being told about it. Then we collect as much information we want about a certain topic and process the information in our brains until we think we have clear picture, opinion, of what actually happened, after a while when we have further collected more evidence so support our opinions, we label them as facts.
So in reality, there is never any real evidence for anything. All we can do is trust what we are being told. If they make a dna test, for example and find the accused persons fingerprints on a weapon, we can only trust the person who make the testing for not making it up, to make it simple here for you to understand.
There is real evidence, you just don’t have it. So if you don’t have any evidence why are you out there in the aether with all of those wild conspiracy claims? You have just admitted you have no evidence to support any of your very wild allegations. Instead of telling others how you think the brain works, you would be better served by learning how the brain works.
The Tsarnaev brothers had education, scholarship were active in sports and teams. Social people. Tamerlan were however reported to be a troublemaker at the gym.
The person whos car they hijacked, was he telling the truth? There is no way of knowing that either.
Tsarnaev brothers were also found to been in the possession of bombs, the same kind used in the Boston Marathon bombings. The FBI was warned by the Russian government that one of the brothers was a potential terrorist and the FBI investigated and dismissed the case for lack of evidence. The Tsarnaev brothers also engaged a multiple local police agencies in a chase and a gun fight in which they used their bombs and which was widely witnessed by civilians.
Two, why would the person whose car had been hijacked lie to police? It is against the law to lie to police. You don’t seem to understand that when you add 2+2 you get 4 and not 666. You have no evidence upon which to base your very bizarre conspiracies. You don’t need to invent fiction to tell the truth.
Not to mention, are you seriously believing that an operation involving 9000 cops was not planned months ahead?
I believe what is known… not what is not known, and not what is created in order to justify some baseless and bizarre theory of events. Where is your evidence that 9,000 police were involved? If you put every Massachusetts State Police officer and every police officer in The City of Boston involved in the shootout and arrest, you would still be well short of that 9,000 police number you cited. The entire Boston police force and state police force number only 4,000 officers. This is another clear case of you either inventing nonsense in an attempt to support your bizarre conspiracy notions. Like I have told you before, 2+2 always equals 4…not 666 or some other number. The truth should be based on reality…not fiction.
There will never be any proof supporting MY theories, because I'm not a credible person, mostly because I'm a woman fron Sweden i.e unaccountable by default.
So there is a global conspiracy against you? No there will never be any proof for any of your theories if you keep making stuff up and thinking irrationally. It has nothing to do with your gender or your country of origin. It has everything to do with evidence and credibility.
The younger Tsarnaev was unarmed when they captured him in the boat.
It would also be better if you did your own homework and not rely on my spare time to do it for you.
First, you don’t know what happened. You are speculating and cherry picking. Most criminals are not arrested with weapons. And that doesn’t change the fact that they hijacked a car, they were involved in a multiagency police chase and gunfight.
You would be better served if you got your facts straight. There is a difference between Turkey and Chechnya. There is a difference between a consul and an honorary consul. And you need to stop inventing facts in order to justify your conspiracy notions.
I'm not a trained FBI agent, so my reaction to a life threatening situation would be depending on the situation itself of course. If someone attacked me out of the blue and I wasn't prepared I would probably be paralyzed at firts, but if I saw it coming and was in a position where life threatening situations occured on a regular basis, I would probably attack.
OK.
But according to reports, the guy was executed.
And what reports would those be and what evidence would they offer to back up their claims? This is a good example of you making stuff up again or using less than credible sources.
Do you work for the FBI joepistole? If so, I have suddenly gained a much better understanding of their complete failure in this case.
No, I don’t work for the FBI nor have I ever worked for the FBI or any police agency. I am a retired businessman.