The black hole "frozen star" interpretation is the one that's right

You could also attempt to explain to river that stellar remnants depend on the mass of the star...Small yellow dwarf stars like the Sun, leave behing White Dwarfs....larger more massive stars leave behind Pulsars/Neutron stars, and even bigger stars leave behind BH's as EDP and NDP that hold up White Dwarfs and Neutron stars from further collapse, are overcome.

What form of matter can ever " collapse " ?

BH are thought to form all galaxies. The center of all galaxies . Upon what energy and matter is it based on ?
 
Last edited:
Nobody cares what you recognise or don't recognise. You can't give any reasons, so why bother giving us your opinion on something like this?
Is this the same river, that doesn't recognise that which we have a photo of, but yet attempts to try and tell us that there was once an Atomic war on Mars, between Alien species??? :eek::rolleyes:
Has he even attempted to explain the observations we see orbiting that which we call a BH? Like matter/energy for example in Cygnus X1 disappearing down a "sink"?? :eek::rolleyes:
 
Is this the same river, that doesn't recognise that which we have a photo of, but yet attempts to try and tell us that there was once an Atomic war on Mars, between Alien species??? :eek::rolleyes:
Has he even attempted to explain the observations we see orbiting that which we call a BH? Like matter/energy for example in Cygnus X1 disappearing down a "sink"?? :eek::rolleyes:

You have not answered my question in my post # 281 .

Being

What form of matter can ever " collapse " ?

BH are thought to form all galaxies. The center of all galaxies . Upon what energy and matter is it based on ?
 
Also, how can you make the claim that black holes are unphysical when you aren't even aware of the basics of how they form? The first step is to understand what you're trying to talk about. Otherwise, when you start making pronouncements about stuff you don't know about, you just end up looking like a bit of an idiot.
While agreeing with that, the first thing I try and explain to some old school mates about how BH's form, is illustrating the actual emptyness of atoms of matter.eg: If we stick the nucleus of a Hydrogen atom in the middle of the Melbourne cricket ground, the electron would be orbiting around the outer grand stand seats. The rest in between is nothingness.

It's just denial for denial's sake, is it? Why do you bother?

Bingo!


A minute ago you were telling me you have no idea how black holes form, so how can you begin to talk about what they are "really about"?


I asked you what is the physical source of the jets. You respond with some nonsense you just made up about "balancing".

You need to stop just making stuff up.
Bingo!!
 
While agreeing with that, the first thing I try and explain to some old school mates about how BH's form, is illustrating the actual emptyness of atoms of matter.eg: If we stick the nucleus of a Hydrogen atom in the middle of the Melbourne cricket ground, the electron would be orbiting around the outer grand stand seats. The rest in between is nothingness.


Bingo!!

Stability of the hydrogen atom needs a certain amount of space .

So do all atoms fundamental existence .
 
Last edited:
BH is based on what physically ?
Why did you ignore my previous answer, merely to repeat the same question again?

If you have questions that follow from my previous reply, try asking those. I see no need to repeat myself.

You can't compress matter endlessly .
Maybe you're right. And the relevance of that observation is... what?

Yet gravitation moves outward not inward .
What do you mean by "gravitation"? Be specific, please.

Tell me also why you believe that gravitation moves.

Once you've done that, please explain the relevance of your comment to the discussion we are having.
 
Why did you ignore my previous answer, merely to repeat the same question again?

If you have questions that follow from my previous reply, try asking those. I see no need to repeat myself.


Maybe you're right. And the relevance of that observation is... what?


What do you mean by "gravitation"? Be specific, please.

Tell me also why you believe that gravitation moves.

Once you've done that, please explain the relevance of your comment to the discussion we are having.

Just give the post # to your first statement .
 
paddoboy:

You could also attempt to explain to river that stellar remnants depend on the mass of the star...Small yellow dwarf stars like the Sun, leave behing White Dwarfs....larger more massive stars leave behind Pulsars/Neutron stars, and even bigger stars leave behind BH's as EDP and NDP that hold up White Dwarfs and Neutron stars from further collapse, are overcome.
I don't think river is interested in the science.

Is this the same river, that doesn't recognise that which we have a photo of, but yet attempts to try and tell us that there was once an Atomic war on Mars, between Alien species??? :eek::rolleyes:
I must have missed that one.

Has he even attempted to explain the observations we see orbiting that which we call a BH? Like matter/energy for example in Cygnus X1 disappearing down a "sink"?? :eek::rolleyes:
No. He seems incapable of writing much more than a single line of text in any given post, for starters, and what he does write is barely interpretable most of the time.

river just makes empty claims about stuff. He does not explain. That's becoming a problem.
 
If I were to assume nothing reaches the event horizon, then why do we not detect gravitational waves forming continuously from two black holes forever inspiraling towards each other.
The detections of LIGO and VIRGO show an almost sudden end to these gravitational waves once the two black holes collide and merge together. There's even a ringdown signature signal from the resulting single black hole as the asymmetries are evened-out.
 
river:

What form of matter can ever " collapse " ?
Are you familiar with balloons?

Blow up a balloon. Tie it closed. Now try to squash it with your hands. You will notice that it compresses. This is an everyday example of matter collapsing into a smaller volume. There are many others that you will notice if you pay attention to the world around you.

BH are thought to form all galaxies. The center of all galaxies . Upon what energy and matter is it based on ?
Why have you ignored my previous answer to your question?

Stability of the hydrogen atom needs a certain amount of space .

So do all atoms fundamental existence .
Okay. And so.... ?
 
If I was to assume nothing reaches the event horizon, then why do we not detect gravitational waves forming continuously from two black holes forever inspiraling towards each other.
The detections of LIGO and VIRGO show an end to these gravitational waves once the two black holes collide and merge together. There's even a ringdown signature signal from the resulting single black hole as the asymmetries are evened-out.
Why would they go on forever? The EH is not any physical barrier, simply a stage in the curvature of spacetime, where the escape velocity equals "c"...so nothing ever gets out. NB: Even Hawking radiation does not require any particle to come back out.
 
Last edited:
river:


Are you familiar with balloons?

Blow up a balloon. Tie it closed. Now try to squash it with your hands. You will notice that it compresses. This is an everyday example of matter collapsing into a smaller volume. There are many others that you will notice if you pay attention to the world around you.


Why have you ignored my previous answer to your question?


Okay. And so.... ?

Your " balloons " are an act of gods hands ?
 
Why would they go on forever?
According to some they never reach the other event horizon. So, that leaves them ''forever'' spiraling around each other making GWs. This is not the case with the LIGO and VIRGO detections, they show there is an end to the GWs.
 
kevin78:

If I were to assume nothing reaches the event horizon, then why do we not detect gravitational waves forming continuously from two black holes forever inspiraling towards each other. The detections of LIGO and VIRGO show an almost sudden end to these gravitational waves once the two black holes collide and merge together. There's even a ringdown signature signal from the resulting single black hole as the asymmetries are evened-out.
When we're talking about the merger of two black holes, the two event horizons in a sense move outwards to meet one another and after a short time there is a single horizon.
 
Why would they go on forever?
kevin is confused because of the description of how matter falls into a black hole. We see it fall towards the event horizon, but we never see it reach the horizon, from "outside".
 
From your post #276

Consider a specific example. A massive star undergoes gravitational collapse, forming a black hole. In the process, an event horizon forms, with all of the mass of the former star inside (apart from any that was ejected in the process - likely a supernova - of forming the hole in the first place).

This is what you are referring to then .
 
According to some they never reach the other event horizon. So, that leaves them ''forever'' spiraling around each other making GWs. This is not the case with the LIGO and Virgo detections, the GWs end.
According to who? The BH's spiral in, orbiting each other, until they merge and form one larger BH. That is what has been detected at least 14 times now.
 
Back
Top