Testicles Transplantation

Plazma Inferno!

Ding Ding Ding Ding
Administrator
I saw this question on the web where a man is inquiring about possible testicle transplantation from a donor.

Now I'm really curious is it possible and what would happen then. Would transplanted testicle produce the sperm of the donor, or the guy who received the transplant?
 
I saw this question on the web where a man is inquiring about possible testicle transplantation from a donor.

Now I'm really curious is it possible and what would happen then. Would transplanted testicle produce the sperm of the donor, or the guy who received the transplant?

The only two benefits could be: (a) hormone production and (b) aesthetics. Neither are significant enough because men get Testosterone from sources other than the testicles and there are always prosthetics to bring his ballsack back to the right proportions (I know a man who has a fake leftie, provided after the original one pulled inside his abdomen and died, becoming effectively a malignant tumor).

The sperm produced would be from the donor, which would be great if the donor was of superior genetic stock.

Though, I can't really see the benefit since the receiver would have to be subjected to a lifetime of immuno-suppressant drugs (to prevent tissue rejection) who's side effects are significantly more unsavory than the hormone imbalance caused by a lack of gonads or the possible physical imbalance caused by a missing nugget.

This guy needs his head examined.

~String
 
I saw this question on the web where a man is inquiring about possible testicle transplantation from a donor.

Now I'm really curious is it possible and what would happen then. Would transplanted testicle produce the sperm of the donor, or the guy who received the transplant?

The testicles would produce the sperm of the donor.
I agree with String that the guy needs to have his head examined..
 
Yep, apparently kids would carry the genetic material of the donor.

And men who aren't producing enough sperm but don’t respond to hormone treatment wouldn't benefit from a testicle transplant anyway – assuming the benefit they're looking for is the ability to pass their genes along to their children. Spermatogenic cells are derived from primordial germ cells that enter the testicles during the fifth week of pregnancy. This means sperm will always carry genetic information that was implanted during embryonic development, which in turn means that the donor of a transplanted testicle, and not the recipient, would be the genetic father of any child that resulted from its sperm.

Source: http://www.straightdope.com/columns/read/2867/can-testicles-be-transplanted

Allogenic transplantation (transplanting of tissue or organs from one person's body to another's) is questionable, mostly because of the tissue rejection problems.

But it has been tried in the past:

The first testicle transplant was in fact performed on roosters by the German physiologist, Arnold Berthold, in 1848. Berthold castrated six male birds and noticed that the birds lost their plume, their aggressive tendencies and all interest in Henhouse magazine centerfolds. He then re-implanted the testicles in two of the birds and in two others, transplanted donor testicles from the last two birds. All four re-testiclized roosters regained their strut and resumed their roosterish ways. Although his experiment was ignored for half a century, Berthold is now held in high regard as the father of modern endocrinology.

The first recorded human transplant was performed in Philadelphia in 1911 by Drs. Levi Hammond and Howard Sutton. The recipient was a 19 year man who had been kicked in the balls. The donor was another young man who had recently bled to death (the alternative would have been a sheep, apparently). Not surprisingly, given the lack of knowledge of immune system functioning at the time, the organ was rejected and the episode was largely forgotten.

But the granddaddy of testicle transplants, the man who truly deserves primacy in this questionable field, was a Chicago urologist by the name of Victor Lespinasse. Lespinasse's operations and their reported success ignited a flurry of testicle transplants in the early 1920s in what has to be one of the weirdest episodes in medical history.

Lespinasse's first transplant patient was a 33 year old man who had the misfortune of losing both testicles independently. The first was lost in a botched hernia operation, the second after an accident. After the loss of the second testicle, the man found he was unable to perform sexually and sought Lespinasse's help in January of 1911. Operating under the assumption that the testicles were the source of masculine vigor, Lespinasse performed the first ever testicle transplant in 1911, three months earlier than the Hammond/Sutton procedure, but he didn't write about it until 1914 (it's "snooze, you lose" in the world of scientific accreditation).

Rather than transplant the donor testicle intact (it was believed to have been purchased from some poor sap who needed the dough), Lespinasse grafted testicle slices (theory being that thin slices would more likely fuse to the existing tissue and not be rejected) in the scrotum and rectus muscle. According to Lespinasse's reports, four days after the operation the recipient reported a strong erection and checked out of the hospital to put it to good use. After a follow-up two years later, Lespinasse reported that the man's virility remained intact.

Source: http://www.altpenis.com/penis_news/testicle_transplants.shtml

Anyway, I don't think it's a 'head problem'. Most of men want to be fathers and will seek for all possible ways.
But, individuals who want to sell their testicles... Well, they're ready for a head check. :)
 
I could never see myself doing this, simply because I don't have the common "need to procreate", but I don't see why the guy needs to have his head examined.
Why does it matter if it is "YOUR" sperm coming out of the little machine?

Maybe the reason I don't understand is BECAUSE I don't have that need to procreate and have never been able to relate to the "fruit of my loins" bit. I've always wanted to adopt.
From my perspective, anyone who goes through any great lengths to have their own kids, while they turn their backs on kids who are already here and being neglected may need to have their heads examined. I think if my body will not procreate, perhaps that means it shouldn't.

At least it's the fruit of your wife's loins - does that count for something?
 
If they don't want kids, and were planning on being neutered, anyway...
Why not?

The loss of testicles does not bode well for men. Lower testosterone levels in men result in numerous health problems. While the critical levels can be maintained by the pituitary gland, the higher levels come from the boys between your legs. There's also a reason why you have two kiwis: redundancy. It's natures little gift to you. And besides, who would want just one? You'd constantly be like that guy who needed a V8. . . always off balance!

Plus. . . plus. . . I just like my gear where it's supposed to be. It's mine and--for better or worse--I've got a lot of my ego wrapped up in it remaining safely where it belongs. They can take my pieces-parts when I'm dead, but until then, the boys stay where they are.

~String
 
The only two benefits could be: (a) hormone production and (b) aesthetics. Neither are significant enough because men get Testosterone from sources other than the testicles and there are always prosthetics to bring his ballsack back to the right proportions (I know a man who has a fake leftie, provided after the original one pulled inside his abdomen and died, becoming effectively a malignant tumor).

Nope, I don't see the benefit either :shrug:
 
The only two benefits could be: (a) hormone production and (b) aesthetics. Neither are significant enough because men get Testosterone from sources other than the testicles and there are always prosthetics to bring his ballsack back to the right proportions (I know a man who has a fake leftie, provided after the original one pulled inside his abdomen and died, becoming effectively a malignant tumor).

The sperm produced would be from the donor, which would be great if the donor was of superior genetic stock.

Though, I can't really see the benefit since the receiver would have to be subjected to a lifetime of immuno-suppressant drugs (to prevent tissue rejection) who's side effects are significantly more unsavory than the hormone imbalance caused by a lack of gonads or the possible physical imbalance caused by a missing nugget.

This guy needs his head examined.

~String

I would be willing to try it. Even if jus for Science sake...crazy or not...I am just beside myself with lack of energy that makes it difficult to even move...it is a hard pill to swallow. An accident literally destroyed my body after #1000 of steel fell on me. It broke my neck and back in 6 places, both of my shoulders, both of my arms and both of my hands and my left leg. It mashed off a finger but I got it put back on (minor)....I have 63 pieces of titanium in me after 29 surgeries so far ( have a 30th surgery coming in May) I had Prostate cancer and underwent an ill-advised radical prostatectomy in 2015.
My testosterone level is ZERO....For some reason EVERY testosterone treatment therapy makes my blood thick. So much so it caused 2 strokes in 2006. My doctor even tried having me see a phlebotomists each week for a bloodletting of a pint every week...it did not work...so I quit everything on that end...
I am sick and tired of feeling sick and tired....willing to try anything to have energy back again. I don't think I need my head examined.
 
I would be willing to try it. Even if jus for Science sake...crazy or not...I am just beside myself with lack of energy that makes it difficult to even move...it is a hard pill to swallow. An accident literally destroyed my body after #1000 of steel fell on me. It broke my neck and back in 6 places, both of my shoulders, both of my arms and both of my hands and my left leg. It mashed off a finger but I got it put back on (minor)....I have 63 pieces of titanium in me after 29 surgeries so far ( have a 30th surgery coming in May) I had Prostate cancer and underwent an ill-advised radical prostatectomy in 2015.
My testosterone level is ZERO....For some reason EVERY testosterone treatment therapy makes my blood thick. So much so it caused 2 strokes in 2006. My doctor even tried having me see a phlebotomists each week for a bloodletting of a pint every week...it did not work...so I quit everything on that end...
I am sick and tired of feeling sick and tired....willing to try anything to have energy back again. I don't think I need my head examined.
That really, really sucks. I hope you find something that helps you!
 
Back
Top