SUPERNOVA FROM EXPERIMENTATION AT CERN AND FERMILAB
Statistically speaking, Type Ia Supernovae are distinguished by having
much greater luminosity at point of maximum light and they are of around
1.40 solar masses or less and also show no presence of hydrogen at maximum
light as well. Should this be caused via a transition towards de Sitter
space then there should be no alteration of hydrogen towards calcium or
other elements in deflagration of Supernova Type Ia. Other types of
supernovae of I Types show presence of helium at time of maximum light.
Should there be exemplars of greater mass levels for Type Ia supernovae
this would again illustrate the artifical nature, e.g., high-energy
physics experimentation generation of a transition towards de Sitter
space. This indicates that CERN as an experimental configuration should generate a Type Ia Supernova thus supporting the work of Albert Einstein and the generalization of the Generalized Theory of Relativity
by Willem de Sitter.
http://www.google.com/search?pz=1&ned=us&hl=en&q=Supernovae+Type&btnmeta=searc
h%3Dsearch=Search+the+Web
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Type_Ia_supernova
http://www.space.com/scienceastronomy/060920_supernova_atypical.html
Please note there is now a limited time frame to bring this supernova generation to the attention of the director of CERN
where the time of onset is now this November, 2009. May we offer our services to offer to present or debate the forthcoming destruction of our planet, our solar system and a host nearby stars via the generation of a Type Ia Supernova. Please contact at: dixon at hawaii.edu
http://lhc.web.cern.ch/lhc/
Where there is no evidence of either helium or hydrogen at maximum light for Type Ia supernova this would further support the hypothesis of a transition towards de Sitter space. This is evidence of a statistical nature.
http://adsabs.harvard.edu/full/1996PASJ...48...51S
Title: Type-Ia Supernova SN 1995D in NGC 2962: Optical V, R, and I Band
Photometry and Spectra, Sadakane, K., Yokoo, T., Arimoto, J.-I., Matsumoto, K., Honda, S., Tanabe, K., ,
Journal: Publ. of the Astronomical Society of Japan, v.48, p.51-57.
Bibliographic Code: 1996PASJ...48...51S
It may be noted in this connection that there is no trace of hydrogen at maximum light for Supernovae Type Ia, which indicates that the companion star for this model is statistically unlikely since most stars are are of an hydrogen dominant order. This observation supports the the origin of these supernovae via a transtion towards de Sitter space or other highly energetic flux. Please note:
The Golden Standard Type Ia Supernova 2005cf: Observations from the
Ultraviolet to the Near-Infrared Wavebands
Wang, X.; Li, W.; Filippenko, A. V.; Foley, R. J.; Kirshner, R. P.;
Modjaz, M.; Bloom, J.; Brown, P. J.; Carter, D.; Friedman, A. S.; Gal-Yam,
A.; Ganeshalingam, M.; Hicken, M.; Krisciunas, K.; Milne, P.; Silverman,
J. M.; Suntzeff, N. B.; Wood-Vasey, W. M.; Cenko, S. B.; Challis, P.; Fox,
D. B.; Kirkman, D.; Li, J. Z.; Li, T. P.; Malkan, M. A.; Moore, M. R.;
Reitzel, D. B.; Rich, R. M.; Serduke, F. J. D.; Shang, R. C.; Steele, T.
N.; Swift, B. J.; Tao, C.; Wong, D. S.; Zhang, S. N.
For the generation of Type Ia supernova thermonuclear explosion explanations have been proposed, none of them have withstood modern testing.
http://www.astrophysicsspectator.com...hermonuclear.h
tml
Thus the formation of a transnsition towards de Sitter space may be considereed as a viable alternative
explanatory framework. Before we take the imprudent action of testing additional energies at CERN or yet again at the Fermi Nationional Acclerator Laboratory in Batavia, Illinois, more theoretical research should be employed to verify the safety of this research in highest-energy physics or all is lost.
An educational presentation may be provided also:
https://laulima.hawaii.edu/access/co...1010/Education
Paul W. Dixon is responsible for this presentation, Copyright 2009 Paul W. Dixon.
Consider the parameters for universe formation as being similar
to that for Type Ia Supernova generation as being very small and
vastly energetic. This may be philosophically difficult to comprehend
yet essentially vital for survival!
The parameter space of inflationary cosmology is seen in the estimate of chaotic expansion theory of the universe beginning at ~10^-43 seconds after the Big Bang, point origin of the Universe with total duration of expansion of 10^-35 seconds or thereabouts. Here the region of expansion no bigger than 10^-33 cm yielding with simultaneous inflations to reach the observable size of our Universe at l<~10^28 cm .. (Andrei Linde, Particle Physics and Inflationary Cosmology, La Tex Harwood, Chur, Switzerland, 1990, p39) Andrei Linde is the leading authority in this important work at the Department of Physics at Stanford University.
http://arxiv.org/PS_cache/hep-th/pdf/0503/0503203v1.pdf
Should we consider the hypothesis of the uniformity of nature as predictive of the abundance of living forms with some of them attaining the capacity to
transfer themselves to our location in the universe, what can account for their absence? We may note in this connection that there is only a short delay before a transition towards de Sitter space at CERN, Fermilab or other high-energy physics experimentation has generated a Type Ia Supernova as demonstrated in this thread. The frequency of Type Ia Supernova in the observable universe would then signal the termination of these technically advanced civilizations. A technical experimental mischance may then occur before the members of the respective civilizations are philosophically ready to accept this possibllity.
The approach of the transition towards de Sitter space at Fermilab
with the ongoing increase in luminoisty is seen:
http://www.fnal.gov/pub/now/tevlum.html
with these energies are now equivalent to those found at the point
origin of the universe. i..e. "The Big Bang."
We need to consider the increased evidence of water on Mars and the possibilty of water
on other planetary bodies as the source of life as well as intelligent life thus supporting the hypothesis
that other creatures much like ourselves can be a source of Type Ia Supernovae.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/science/nature/7919113.stm
It is generally agreed that the the Large Hadron Collider will provide an
empirical test for the formation of transition towards de Sitter space.
The collisional energetcis are much greater that those tested in the
Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory in Batavia Illinois.
"The Large Hadron Collider (LHC) is being built in a circular tunnel 27 km
in circumference. The tunnel is buried around 50 to 175 m. underground. It
straddles the Swiss and French borders on the outskirts of Geneva.
The first beams were circulated successfully on 10th September 2008.
...fortunately on 19th September a serious fault developed damaging a
number of superconducting magnets. The repair will require a long
technical intervention which overlaps with the planned winter shutdown.
The LHC beam will, therefore, not see beam again before September 2009.
The LHC is designed to collide two counter rotating beams of protons or
heavy ions. Proton-proton collisions are foreseen at an energy of 7 TeV
per beam."
The competing hypothesis which is considered even more objectionable than the transition towards de Sitter space is given in the False Vacuum solution to the Einstein de Sitter equations. Yet as can be seen in this formulation high-energy physics experimentation may serve as a trigger for this most untoward event.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/False_vacuum
Please note in this regard that the transition towards de Sitter space is well-known in the cosmological literature.
http://www.springerlink.com/content/p8377167602421t1/
An affidavit regarding the contingency of a Type Ia Supernova has been submitted as part of the legal action to bring a moratorium against such an experimental mischance.
http://dockets.justia.com/docket/cou...case_id-78717/
Many thanks for the happy birthday wishes!!!
With the additional energies available at the LHC in CERN, it may also be possible to test the competing hypothesis of forming a transition to the lower condition in the Einstein de Sitter Universe. Following the formation of this transition, our Universe would drain off into the lower energy condition. This should be of a lesser probabilty of occurence yet it is still considered as a possible outcome to this research.
Please note:
http://professordixon.blogspot.com
The WORLD RECORD luminosity now employed at the accelerator (Please note:
Accelerator Division Notification on the Fermilab Home Page) is 362.37 E30.
In scientific notation, this 362.37 x 10 to the 30th power particle interactions. With a beam energy of 10 to the 11th power electron volts, we have then the energy of the current work at Fermilab set a 362.37 x 10 to the 41st power electron volts (362.37 E 41 eV). This is much greater than the largest energies seen on earth via cosmic ray interactions at 10 to the 19th power eV (E 19 eV). Without publicity regarding this most critical danger,
a breach in the potential barrier may occur at any moment thus releasing
the force of a supernova on our planet and solar system. We will thus have an intrusional event from de Sitter space in the Einstein de Sitter Universe
as it is now termed. Your kind and generous action on behalf of all
mankind is greatly needed at this critical juncture or all is lost and we
shall all perish.
Please note that the return flight of the Columbia shuttle was not halted because of the false belief that the the foam shards could not cause a life threatening defect in the aerodynamic properties of the shuttle.
http://www.reuters.com/article/lates.../idUSN30568874
As a fictional work, the novel Anathem remarks on scientists tinkering with what they do not understand. To quote from the journal Nature, "Anathem is a shrewd exploration of what might happen if the fear of scientists meddling with things they were never meant to know becomes entirely justified." with space-time itself included in the list of potential problem areas.
(Jennifer Rahn, Imprisoned by intelligence, Neal Stephenson, Anathem, Opinion Nature, 456, 7221, 27 November 2008, 447-447)
It may be noted in this connection that the term Anathem refers to an ecumenical curse of severe proportions. This may be understood to mean that we are expected to take extreme exception with predjudice to the work of those who would destroy us and our children through this meddling.
Tycho Brahe's supernova, now identified as a Type Ia Supernova, shows those characteristics as predicted by the model expected in supernova from experimentation. A large Supernova has been generated leaving behind a type G star such as is found in our solar system. (Andrea Pastorello, Astrophysics, Echo from an ancient supernova, Nature 456, 7222, 4 December 2008, 587-589) The technique of light echoes was used for this identification of an historical object.
As noted in Chang, J.,et al., An excess of cosmic ray electrons at energies of 300-800 GeV (Nature, 456, 7220, 20 November 2008, pp. 362-365) could be tapping into "muti-dimensional spaces with potenially important implications for our understanding of the Universe." Similarly, we may postulate that Type Ia supernovae are expressing the energetics of an n-dimensional space
whose properties may be understood with further study.
Please note that while the Type II Supernovae have origin in 10 or more solar mass objects Type Ia Supernovae have origin in objects of some 1 solar mass.
It may be noted in this connection that the smaller massed Supernova give rise to deflagration of some 10 billion solar luminosities whilst the larger objects give rise to some 1 billion solar luminosity deflagration objects. This difference may lend support that the energetics of Type Ia Supernovae is created via an aperture formed towards de Sitter space. As also noted in this connection, there is no trace of hydrogen at maximum light for Type Ia Supernovae thus making it statistically unlikely that they have reached the Chandrssekhar limit by accretion from a nearby solar object.
http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu...ro/snovcn.html
The formation of Type 1a Supernovae is dependent on them reaching the Chandrasekhar limit of greater than 1.4 solar mass to implode into a Supernova according to current theory.
http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu...ro/snovcn.html
Yet there is evidence that the Type !a Supernova can form at one solar mass
or less thus contradicting current theory and thus supporting the alternate theory where Type Ia Suoernovae may be formed via the formation of a transition towards de Sitter space.
Probing Dark Energy with Supernovae
by Sebastian Ihle
9.6.2006
As noted in our sciforums discussion, there are a number of competing hypotheses. An empirical investigation is under way at CERN in the LHC.
Should we generate a Type Ia Supernova, this will confirm the existence of a
highly energetic topologically cobordant continuum termed de Sitter space.
So far, the astrophysical theoretical generalizations of the generalized theory of relativity have been confirmed at the 100% level. The world's largest experiment may yet create a tragic confirmatiion of Albert Einstein's theory.
Please recall that the energies now proposed for the LHC at CERN will be some 7 times greater that those employed at FERMILAB. As is well-known, the energies in use at FERMILAB approximate those predicted for those found at the point origin of the Universe. Thus even from a Common Sense perspective we may penetrate the potential barrier towards de Sitter space
thus releasing the force of Type Ia Supernova on our planet with the increaased energies to be employed at the LHC. Please note:
Philosophy and Common Sense (Frances)
"Not every philosophy professor takes philosophy seriously in the sense
that she thinks that some purely philosophical theories that go against
common sense have a good chance to be true. These philosophers respect
anti-commonsensical theories, in that they admit such theories are very
important in the pursuit of philosophical understanding. But they also
think that there is no real chance that they are true. If you have a valid
argument based not on scientific but purely philosophical reasoning, and
that argument concludes with something against cross-cultural and timeless
common sense, then at least one of the premises isnt true, or so they say.
It might be tremendously difficult to identify the mistaken premise, but
we can start our investigation off assuming that our assumption that the
conclusion is false is safe. These philosophers take philosophising
seriously, of course, but they dont take seriously the idea that purely
philosophical (so not empirical, not mathematical) theories have a good
chance at overthrowing parts of common sense."
A videotaped presentation of this statement is under preparation. Link to this will be provided as soon as it is made ready. This should provide a more interesting source. We welcome any suggestions you may have in this connection for illustrative material. Please let us know what Malcolm Perry would indicate regarding the formation of a transition towards de Sitter space via highest-energy physics experimentation.
Highest energy physics is an empirical science as noted below. We may then discover through experimentation the answer to our theoretical questions
which are then derived from observation. Should the ongoing LHC at CERN produce the Higgs boson and field, this would then be a major victory for the Standatrard Model in Physics. Should we note the generation of a Type Ia Supernova, this will further confirm the current record of 100% successful predictions of the Generalized Theory of Relavity of Albert Einstein. These energies to be generated at CERN are those energy levels seen some 10^-9 - 10^-14 seconds subsequent to the point origin of the Universe. Experimentally we note that these energies are deemed sufficient for the testing of these hypotheses.
Please access this webpage for a thorough update on the LHC at CERN.
http://www.lhcdefense.org/
Generation of Type Ia Supernova via a transition to de Sitter space may be added to this description as a consequence of highest energy physics experimentation.
There has been a brief hiatus introduced from now until April or thereabouts for the reactivation of the LHC at CERN. We should consider all possible alternatives before this gravely irresponsible experiment begins anew.
Please recall that the activation of the Large Hadron Collider at CERN is the onset of the largest highest-energy experiment so far extant on our planet.
The empirical observation of a Type Ia Supernova will serve as another confirmation of the Generalized Theory of Albert Einstein. This theory, as noted below, has had 100% verifcation in other astrophysical observations.
Let us not be so rash as to further test this theory and lose all that we hold most dear as a sacrifice to the ambitions of ruthless egoism and professional incompetence. We may discover the Higgs boson and field and yet create a perforation in the potential barrier towards de Sitter space and create a Supernova. The tentative date for the onset of the collisional actions at CERN is now around May 1, 2009.
From the LHC Machine Outreach
The LHC is designed to collide two counter rotating beams of protons or
heavy ions. Proton-proton collisions are foreseen at an energy of 7 TeV
per beam.
The WORLD RECORD luminosity now employed per example at the US accelerator (Please note:
Accelerator Division Notification on the Fermilab Home Page) is
288.89E30.
In scientific
notation, this 288.89 x 10 to the 30th power particle interactions. With
a beam energy of 10 to the 11th power electron volts, we have then the
energy of the current work at Fermilab set a 288.89 x 10 to the 41st
power
electron volts (288.89 E 41 eV). This is much greater than the largest
energies seen on earth via cosmic ray interactions at 10 to the 19th
power eV (E 19 eV). Without publicity regarding this most critical danger,
a breach in the potential barrier may occur at any moment thus releasing
the force of a supernova on our planet and solar system. We will thus have an
intrusional event from de Sitter space in the Einstein de Sitter Universe
as it is now termed. Your kind and generous action on behalf of all
mankind is greatly needed at this critical juncture or all is lost and we
shall all perish as this undergoes a vast increment at CERN.
As one of the seven plaintiffs in the District Court in Hawaii, may I offer a formal complaint agasinst Director of CERN Robert Aymar and to John Ellis chief theoretican of CERN to appear in the International Court in the Hague to answer charges of gross negligence in the operation of the Large Hadron Collider at CERN. As noted in this post, is the formal derivation of the generation of Type Ia Supernova from their experiment following the well-known work of Albert Einstein and his colleague Willem de Sitter in the generalized theory of relativity. The energies in nature do not approximate those found some 10^-9 to 10^-14 seconds subsequent to the Big Bang at the pont origin of the Universe without forming a transition towards de Sitter space as noted per exemplar in Type II supernovae and in quasars. Their willingness to proceed with this experiment with full knowledge of this potentiallity consititutes a criminal act of public endangerment. May we request that the good people of Switzerland discontinue power service to CERN until this matter has reached full legal disposition in the International Court in the Hague.
May I add a personal note to this discussion. We should preserve the
future for all mankind. Children have the right to grow-up in a safe and
sheltered environment. We need to give our children the time to dream and
grow into all future time. We should visit other planets, other stars, other
galaxies to see and understand all things. Let us call for patience in
this research endeavor until we are certain of the potential dangers that
may lurk for the unsuspecting researcher. One Supernova will terminate all
that we hold most dear.
Update on the research progress at CERN.
End of July: First particles may be injected, and the commissioning with
beams and collisions will start.
It is expected that it will take about 2 months to have first collisions
at 10 TeV. Please note that only one area remains at below collisional
energies.
We shall now observe at CERN the onset of collisional energies at far
greater impact than those observed at Fermilab.
http://www.sciam.com/article.cfm?id=...der-first-beam
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/science/nature/7512586.stm
The Director General of CERN Robert Aymar as well as the safety officers
of CERN have received the appended posting. We may hope that this message
will alert them to the forthcoming generation of a Type Ia Supernova from
the experimental highest-energy physics at CERN. So far, as the
preparation for the LHC experiment continues, there has been no refutation
of the theoretical work of Albert Einstein and the extension of his
Generalized Theory of Relativity by Willem de Sitter. This forms the basis
of our understanding of the Einstein de Sitter Universe as it is now
termed. A review of the cosmological perspective is provided in the generation of Type Ia Supernova:
http://professordixon.blogspot.com/
Please note: Cool down at CERN is near completion as all segments are in
the blue condition. Collisional energetics should now be observed shortly.
May God have mercy on the souls of all our children.
http://lhc.web.cern.ch/lhc/
As we are in engaged in an eschatological discourse, the "philosophy of
last things," we need to distinguish between black hole generation as well
as strangelets and Type Ia Supernova. Their generation and their effects
are uncertain whilst Type Ia Supernova Generation is almost completely
certain as are as any of the effects under the auspices of Albert
Einstein's generalized theory of relativity. Please note: Dragging of
Inertial Frames (Ignazio Ciufloni (2007) Nature 7158, 449, 41-53) Walter
L. Wagner and I have discusssed this. Type Ia Supernova generation will be
sudden and the destruction of our planet, our solar system and a host of
nearby stars will follow. Should the CERN LHC (Large Hadron Collider) cool
down schedule proceed as now planned, an empirical test of the hypothesis
of Type Ia Supernova generation via highest energy physics experimentation
will commence in June/July 2008. The 7 Tev phase of the research would
then begin at this time. Please note:
http://lhc.web.cern.ch/lhc/
cooldown progress in preparation of the empirical test of this hypotheisis
at the LHC in CERN as noted above.
Please review, "Quantum tunnelling towards an exploding Universe?"
by Malcolm J. Perry (1986) (Nature Vol. 320, 24 April, p. 679)
It may be helpful to clarify the philosophical position and astrophysical
energetics instrinsic to de Sitter space in the standard cosmological
model in this postulation of transition from de Sitter space as generative
of supernova in high-energy physics experimentation.
A philosophical position may be cited from, G. W. F. Hegel (The philosophy
of history, New York: Dover, 249, 1956) ..." there is no essential
existence which does not manifest itself." The very large energies derived
by Willem de Sitter for the equations describing the false vacuum of de
Sitter space yield an energy density of 1.69 x 10^126 for eV (electron
volts) per cm^3. (Gott, R. (1982) Creation of open universes from de
Sitter space, Nature, 295, 304-307. In Waldrop. M.M., (1982) Bubbles upon
the river of time, Science, 215, 4536, 1082-1083), the energy density of
de Sitter space is given as: 5 x 10^31 kelvin and 3 x 10^93 grams per cm^3
, converted to eV via e=mc^2 which is Albert Einstein's famous equation.
This energy would then find expression in the observable universe. In the
sense of this analysis, it would be quite unlikely that energies of this
order of magnitude would remain hidden should a transition be formed in
the potential barrier towards de Sitter space. This would serve as an
immediate and ever present danger for the investigator and constitutes a
public endangerment as well.
This is based on the mainstream theory of universe formation by Professor
R. Gott of Princeton University in which each bubble universe forms
smoothly out of de Sitter space. A potentially infinite number of
universes may form in de Sitter space. In a topological sense, de Sitter
space is cobordant at each point with the continuum (our universe). De
Sitter space is then prevented by a large potential barrier from forming
an intrusional event into the continuum. The essential hypothesis of this
formulation is that with sufficiently great energetics, a classical breach
in the potential barrier towards de Siitter space will be formed thus
releasing the force of Type Ia supernova upon the terrestrial ecosphere,
the solar system and those nearby stars. These energies are from de Sitter
space, therefore; the energies of the accelerator only serve as a trigger
for their release.
With sufficient energies, under this postulation, we discover that the
accelerator is in the Einstein de Sitter universe, as it is now termed,
and we have gone from particle physics as our governing theory to
relativistic cosmology.
This supports of the theoretcal position that sufficient energy will penetrate the potential barrier towards de Sitter space thus releasing the force of an exploding Universe i.e., Supernova, on our planet. The works of Albert Einstein and Willem de Sitter as shown here have never been refuted.
From the viewpoint of classical physics, the penetration towards de Sitter space is prevented by a large though not infinite potential barrier as described by Malcolm Perry. As the energies in the collliders go from 10^-9 seconds to 10^-14 seconds subsequent to the big bang at the point origin of the Universe, this penetrance becomes inevitable thus releasing the force of a Type Ia Supernova on our planet, solar system and host of nearby stars.
All the children will thank you for your kind efforts on their behalf.
Yours sincerely,
Paul W. Dixon, Ph.D.
Supernova from Experimentation
