http://cust.idl.com.au/rubbo/quantum/
"From the main formula of quantum theory (E=HV) it follows that light is “granular”. Experiment proved it. It consists of not only separate quanta, but also of separate intermittent “grains” of energy of the value. Quantity of these “grains” depends on frequency of oscillations of the source (V). This means that every oscillation generates an atom of energy of the (h) value. And the series of these oscillations makes a quantum."
"every oscillation generates an atom of energy"
"Thus quantum of light presents by itself the chain of atoms of energy. In almost 3-meter photon of the orange colour, for example, about 5 million atoms of energy move with the distance between each other 6058 A. And the eternal question “What is light?’ may be answered: Light is the flow of atoms of energy in the photons. As such atoms- impulses of energy make quanta by themselves, then they can be considered as “subquanta”.
Ok, so I'm getting a little confused, in that here I've absconded with a couple of short tid bits from the above link, in which this message is suggesting by way of QM that photons might actually create atoms of energy, while it otherwise continually refers to the photon as a form of coexistence and/or reliance upon the atom, and/or perhaps vise versa. Although of whichever came first, the atom or the photon, or doesn't it matter?
Perhaps the problem I'm having with said photon is that it's actually a very large quantum string, or whatever complexity that is.
If in fact the photon is reliant upon the atomic influence (Oort zone or extended field of coulomb influence), and if within the near-vacuum of space held but a few atoms/m3 of sodium (like those which Dr. Wang obtained a 310X light speed result), whereas once within or past a given nullification zone the opportunity of said photons exceeding 3e8 m/s becomes more likely, at least as for those riding through and/or being superconducted along from atom to atom?
If those few atoms were 10 fold further apart than the given photon wavelength, and if the photon was having to make good on its constant of light speed, but in order to accomplish this task needed to transport itself 10 times as far between those extended nodes of sodium atoms, thereby it stands to reason that the end result of covering a great distance containing such few atoms would in fact transpire in 1/10th the time.
OOPS, I think I just shrunk the universe. Sorry about that.
I'm not suggesting that naturally created photons have this expanse leaping capability, although I'm obviously suggesting that if folks like Dr. Wang accomplish a 310 fold improvement in dealing with photons, then perhaps artificially it's possible for a focused stream of laser photons to take advantage of a similar sort of sodium atom environment, and basically go for it, of which this might require a transponder near or within the given nullification zone in order to expedite those photons along at the 310X speed of light.
Between us and the moon offers a slight nullification zone, although I believe there's still way too many atoms in the way, and perhaps if it matters, few of those being of sodium.