Starting Civilization From Scratch
- Thread starter lixluke
- Start date
What is the basis of this thread but presumptuous projection masquerading as "free thought"?
Logic is baseless with no presumption, you fool. See the incompleteness theorum. Baseless logic is utterly useless.
Perception is neither illogical or logical by its very nature. It is the basis for the framework thereof. Logic is based on perception.
Lixdix demostrates clearly and repeatedly that his perception is skewed to the the dangerous and non-productive. His entire premise is a rationalization constructed to support his ego with continually defies the reality that he's a loser and a failure, socio-economically. Rather than correct and try again - he "rages against the machine" so to speak, with the specific purpose of gathering support for his hatred of the evil monsters that made him that way. He wants recognition for the brilliance that doesn't exist except in a fantasy he created, and demands the world capitulate to his childish, ignorant, immature, baseless... etc. etc. etc. whinings. I say the little bitch deserves ten kinds of spankings. Fuck him, and fuck you if you indulge his sorry excuse for a mind.
Your comment is psychobabblish, self-indulgant gibberish.
Pathetic rant.
It is not my fault that you are a wesmoron that cannot compare to real logic of true high evolutions. Your motto is "there is nothing I can doabout it."
Unfortunately when there is nothing we can do about it, there is nothing we can do about it.
Pathetic Aplogism: "There will always be violence. There is nothing we can do about it."
Pathetic Apologism: "There will always be poverty. There is nothing we can do about it."
Pathetic Apologism: "All humans are violent and greedy by nature. Nature is something nobody can do anything about."
Pathetic Apologism: "I don't believe that human nature is the ability of humans take control of their thoughts, feelings, and actions, and intentionally do something about any person deficit they may have. Human nature is not that. Human nature is personality deficits that the human can do nothing about. Therefore, they are not really deficits, but excusable."
Out of the what, 20 or so people who have posted in this thread? two have already decided to kill and eat you.
Extrapolate that to 100,000 and, well, there's not much of you to go around.
Unless of course you presume that 100,000 people randomly selected from the entire population won't actually behave like the majority of people.
Which is a bit presumptuous.
Unbelievably arrogant and unfounded. Wow, an "expert". *yawn*
Lol. "weak brain projections"? Is that what the "high evolved individuals" call it? Funny that you find yourself above it when you're the prime example - as are all humans. You see, one's experience in the basis of their "reality". The only means by which one has to relate to the world is through that reality, as such - your statement is true for all humans and beyond that, all possible conscious beings that I could imagine. It's more of a geometry thing than anything else really... as something that is itself has only itself to be, and that which isn't it must be related through it, as there is nothing else through which it could relate, by definition...
But for you, it justifies your feigned superiority to pretend there is some sort of superiorty in genetics.... as if one this is somehow better than the other, and you've identified the differences by the resultant behavior and stratified the species, naturally falling to your place at the "high table". You pathetic, disgusting little egotist, every table is the "high table" for those egotists who sit at it. (and note that it's only the egotists who find their table to be so, the rest are just sitting at some tables with a bunch of people) Yet somehow you find yours "special". Very, very telling... but it's not like you're pretending you don't, so the telling had been done and done and done from you. Your credentials are established. You're the elite. Your "skill is cool". You are "christ like". You are the only one who really gets it.
The catch-22 of the megalomaniac, like that of many others, is that admitting to one's self the possibility of the problem invokes a survivalist reaction from the condition that rejects it and anything along its lines with a vehement reaction as has been demonstrated in any post that ever challenges the validity of your retarded little fantasies. Anyone who doubts this, please look at "all posts by user" on this sorry wretch, and note the number of violent rejections of reasonable comments. My bet is that it's literally the majority of his posts.
*sigh*
People read things in teh context from which they comprehend them. have you seen the studies about mispelled and missing words that people don't even necessarily notice, the brain just fills them in? It's not want, it's psychology and all are subject to it. Sorry to inform your "leetness" that you're just another human... one who wouldn't last long without the EVIL system he exploits to maintain his pathetic survival.
It's not characterstic, you fucking moron. It's possible. It's circumstantial. There are certain conditions that foster it. It's not a certainty, but damn near. Were you to utilize your pathetic grey matter for any other purpose that to support your ego problems, it might be possible that you understand the conditions that lead to it. Those conditions would almost sure arise in the 'new world' you propose, and most likely in the manner I described - of course considering that enough people survived the malnutrition, etc. to get to that point. Eventually, someone would try to do something to someone they didn't want done. They'd insist on it, and the only way to stop it would be through physicality of some sort. Eventually some similar condition would arise in which some individual would have no choice in their mind but to fight for what they beleive, and risk whatever they had to risk to establish it. Surely at some point, that would be human on human violence. Actually in the scenario described it would probably come about pretty quickly, as people's survival would depend on things they didn't have, but others might. So many scenarios. The most simplistic: You are stronger than me. You know you'll die if you do not eat. I am weak and dying, but manage to gather together a bunch of food, enough for two people for 6 months maybe. You have not. I do not want to share my food because I worked myself almost to death to get it, or whatever. You demand me to do so, as I've stripped the area we're both in of any useful food. You'd have to travel for days to get more. You're on your own, I've got a beautiful wife with me, and a lot of food. You're desperate and know death is just a week away if you do not compensate. YOu could choose to run away and find a new area, or you could do the easier thing. You kill me and take my wife and my food.
You might choose otherwise, but probability says that of perhaps 100 people in desperate, survivalist conditions - at least one would choose murder and rape over their own extinction.
But you are too stupid to understand, so fuck you and your stupid sorry ass.
And simpletons summarize it with such naive simplicity, as if it's something that isn't possible. Funny thing is I'd bet you'd be one of the first to resort to it, as your desperation and disfunctional ego would find your personal survival as more important than the less evolved who likely ostracized you. Of course you'd then rationalize that what YOU did wasn't "violence", and you'd come up with some other word to described what YOU did.. like "self preservation" or "god's will" or whatever bullshit you have to shovel to maintain your tenuous grip on reality.
No, that's what elitist morons tell themselves to try to pretend their better than other people.
You'd only know "real" if it popped you in the face. Hmm. I doubt you'd even recognize it then.
Last edited:
Uh, you responded to stuff I didn't say as if it was stuff I said. Is it "evolved" to be wholly dishonest and misrepresentative?
Of course your so "evolved" that honesty or a real conversation with anyone "less evolved" is a waste of your prescious ego support moments, I understand. Wouldn't want to face the reality that you're really just a mislead fool. Scary stuff someone SO evolved. Of course it's not possible, right?
Wow, you thought I was serious? I was trying my best not to make any sense whatsoever. Geezuzkhrist.
lixluke must be either 10 years old, some kind of cleverly programmed script or a comedic genius.
sometimes I think he's just trolling, and other times I think he's likely insane.
other times I'm pretty sure he believes all the shit he spews. i don't know. i just react to the words, which if he's a troll, is exactly the point for him. he's certainly not ten. he's been posting here for several years, so if he was ten when he started he's likely at least 15 by now. I'm pretty sure he's in his early twentiesish.
I don't think he's a script, and I'm almost sure he's not a genius...
I think he's a youngish dumbass with a chip on his shoulder, but shit I have no way to verify. I do believe all the evidence supports my conclusion though, or I'd change it. there was someone on the board who occasionally returns that used to chat with him and shit. he said some stuff that corroborates, but meh, I don't care ultimately aboot that I guess. I just like to break it doon.
other times I'm pretty sure he believes all the shit he spews. i don't know. i just react to the words, which if he's a troll, is exactly the point for him. he's certainly not ten. he's been posting here for several years, so if he was ten when he started he's likely at least 15 by now. I'm pretty sure he's in his early twentiesish.
I don't think he's a script, and I'm almost sure he's not a genius...
I think he's a youngish dumbass with a chip on his shoulder, but shit I have no way to verify. I do believe all the evidence supports my conclusion though, or I'd change it. there was someone on the board who occasionally returns that used to chat with him and shit. he said some stuff that corroborates, but meh, I don't care ultimately aboot that I guess. I just like to break it doon.
How many names has he gone through? Was cool skill only one of many?
Oh, I think there's something BAD wrong with that boy!!! I'm also convinced that he has no one to talk to .....hmmm, I wonder why??!
Perhaps someone should put up a poll, and we could all vote on it?!
Baron Max
that's the only other I know of.
i'd suspect he's had other sock puppets, but have nothing to back it up. no clue. other people might know more.
if he's a troll sock-puppet of another, cooler member, that's impressive to maintain the role without cracking up and giving it away. I don't think he is though. i think he's a real person, only had the two names and perhaps a sock puppet or two, and like I said, chip, shoulder, blah.
YOU DON'T HAVE A CHILD, DO YOU!?!?!!?!?
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!!
What a precious thread!! Why did I miss it for soooo long!?!?