Star Trek - Original Series Philosophy.

You guys are SO wrong

for starters starwars has the queen (DAM!!!!!!!):eek:

And its got a brillant story line

And the Force

And is very phyisoical

And has the QUEEN:D
 
Yeah, cactus you have to admit the thing about the queen. I agree with asguard:

DAYAM!!
 
Yeah, I must admit the Queen is one of the Hottest chicks EVER!
Though Diana Troy was good. I still like Star Trek even if no Light saber fights, Leanord Nimoy is the man.

Oh and check this out:
 
I LOVE fansy and scifi dosn't do very much for me

I LOVE magic and thats something star trek lacks

Just like it lacks the ablity to just fall into it
 
Star Trek has had its moments, but its not half as thrilling as Star Wars. Star Wars has got more street cred with "Empire.." under its belt, though the Phantom Menace was a kick in the balls.

Mind you, Star Trek had the Borg,which were pretty cool. The problem is that Star Trek has turned into a sausage machine, churning out episodes by the dozens to meet a franchise requirement. The Next Generation was my favourite, but when you have a series with 22 episodes a season for about 7 years about a crew on a starship, there's really only so many stories you can tell. To have another series with a crew on a....space station (DS9), and another series about another crew on a starship (VGR), and a new series about, um, another crew on another starship (Enterprise), you end up mauling the concept to death. Plus the fact the concept was developed in the 60's for the original series , as well as the movies, and an animated series...

I cant be the only one thats bored to death of seeing starfleet officers planet-hopping through the galaxy. What kind of concepts would other Star Trek fans like to see? Something based on Earth perhaps? Or maybe a short series focused on a particular subject matter, perhaps a series that has nothing to do with space travel at all. Come on, Star Trek is supposed to be a sci-fi show, theres a ton of things that the series has covered which could be done in more depth (e.g. Time Travel, Artificial Intelligence, Klingon warrior culture etc.)
 
Yeah, true. Actualy I think they're both about equal. And I suppose your right, Star Trek is about quantity not quality while Star Wars is the oppisite. However you slice it though - both are cool.
 
the queen! i think they made a natalie portman calender!

its hard to say what is better, though both are well done and very deep, Star Trek has a lot more content, for it is on TV, and Star Wars may only be nine movies,

though both have novels about them those all suck, letting shatner write, what idiot, what idiot did it!?

My vote goes to Star Wars just because:

for starters starwars has the queen (DAM!!!!!!!)

And its got a brillant story line

And the Force

And is very phyisoical

And has the QUEEN

just gotta go with Star Wars for obvious reasons
 
Hey guyz
K first off u dont have 2 b a nerd 2 enjoy star trek im a sporty guy n i pick up girls but if their uncomfortable with me mentioning star treks my favorite show in the world.. o the known galaxy... fuk em

Star trek --- star wars battle!! hmmmm

Star wars deffianly more philisophical although throughout all of star treks eppisodes they have theirs too...

Queen vs. Diana Troy -- im sorry guyz dianna troy, she does it for me! lol

Which is better, personal preffereance star trek... fun factor, depth in characters thoughout all the sessions, paralel universe "what if" eppisodes, "Q", and the rest

Yoda teachs with words (amazing words)

capitain picard shows sudilly and consistantly by exampkle... superb acting skills which i belive isnt much acting at all.... patrick stewrt does really have a stong sturdy character and hes a man i can idolize, i wish i could idolize yoda but i cant, only his philosophys!!!! pce out guyz
 
Back
Top