Would you please start your own thread with your own ideas?
SR Issue Split
- Thread starter brucep
- Start date
- Status
Would you please start your own thread with your own ideas?
Motor Daddy
Valued Senior Member
In order for your ideas to be correct they have to be the same as my ideas...
But as you wish, squander your time!
Thanks.
Sadly, you have already done this on many message boards where we see the sage of your one dumb mistake, someone pointing it out, and you not getting it and eventually leaving.
Seriously, go see your doctor again.
Prove your assertions.
rpenner already showed you. You don't want to check his analysis to closely since it means you'll have to realize you're full of crap. The rest of this thread is about how you're going to stonewall any requirement to actually review his analysis [admit you're wrong]. And I'm going to point out that what Physbang said about your previous forum involvement is completely true. So go ahead and stonewall me by demanding I 'prove it'.
This dumb ass thread should be 'run off'.
I'm fairly certain he was given a life time ban from "Cosmoquest" for the continued rubbish about SR being wrong.
Then you can specify where the math or conclusions are wrong. This is a science and math thread, so I expect you have math to support your "opinion".
I expect you to post your math.
I'm certainly not going to question the invalid nature of your maths. rpenner has already done that at least three times.
I would like to know why you were permanently banned from Cosmoquest?
And why if you are correct as you claim, that you don't get it peer reviewed?
You were also banned here in alternative theories from memory about your claims SR is wrong, now you come here under the maths guise to keep up with the same nonsense.
Why not be honest enough to say what you really think?
I was not banned by anyone.
Further, if you think RPenner is correct, prove it.
This is a math and science thread where only proof is accepted.
I am dealing with RPenner. You have nothing to offer. Why do you bother to post?
I may be mathematically ignorant at SR level, but I have offered validated evidence that SR is an exceptionally correct theory.
Do you agree?
You were permanently banned at Cosmoquest.
Irrespective of that, and since I am ignorant of the mathematical side of SR, I'll let you nut out your errors with rpenner.
Personally, being a party to your obstinate stubborness before, I do not give rpenner much hope in changing your stance, and consequently, I see this thread ultimately being scrubbed or moved.
Agreed. So who cares what you have to say. Take your opinions to pseudoscience.
I abhore pseudoscience, and that has nothing to do with my lacking mathematical skills, just as your mathematical skills do not invalidate SR.
But you fail to answer my other question.
Why don't you get your obvious anti SR stance peer reviewed, if you are convinced your maths is correct?
Can I have an answer, please?
I am not interested in your non-science questions to me.
But peer review is part of the scientific process.
You cannot ignore it just because you know they will give you an epic fail.
You have essentially nothing worthy to be called science until you submit to peer review, and your past record here and elsewhere attests to that fact.
Why you're still posting here is the question. rpenner is correct. The fact you can't understand that proofs your overall inability to discuss subjects of this nature. You were banned here so you're a liar. Stonewalling people with the comment 'prove it' is kinda funny since you couldn't understand the proof if your life depended on it. You're embarrassing yourself chinglu.
- Status