Spanking Lowers IQ Points

Personally, I think some kids deserve a good spanking.

Personaly... i dont thank anybody deserves punishment.!!!


[Emphasis mine]

Well, I'm not sure. I have heard that "spankins" increase proficiency in spelling... :poke: :spank:

Not surprizinly i queston corpral punishment as a desirable learnin tool.!!!

1 time i got slapped by a teecher cause i coudnt read the firs word in my readin lesson when she tested me at her desk... an even after she slapped me i still didnt know how to read the word :confused:

It was in the firs grade... us kids was settin on the floor studyin our lesson... an jus befor it was my time to go to the teechers desk an read our lesson to her a Guy named Murel tolt me i was studyin the rong lesson... that we was on the nest lesson in our reader book... well i went up to the teechers desk to read to her an i coudnt even read the firs word (Mother)... i was stutterin aroun tryin to read the word an all the suddin "SLAP"... an then she saw i was on the rong lesson an turned the page to the corect story an i read it oK.!!!

Normaly she was a oK teecher... i guess she was havin a bad day.???
 
Last edited:
You just said that I don't deserve to get punished for having kicked you in the balls. And just generally, you stated that people don't deserve to get punished. So if we'd go after your script, I wouldn't get punished.

Gettin punished an deservin punishment is 2 diferent thangs.!!!
 
Yes. Generally the definition for the word punishment implies that the received penalty was a deserved one. I don't see how this isn't obvious to you. But maybe it's just my sloppy semantics playing the bad guy here.
 
Yes. Generally the definition for the word punishment implies that the received penalty was a deserved one. I don't see how this isn't obvious to you. But maybe it's just my sloppy semantics playing the bad guy here.

O... oK... but do you thank ALL punishments are deserved.???
 
O... oK... but do you thank ALL punishments are deserved.???

No, I don't. But generally every undeserved punishment is considered as mistreatment, or abuse in my eyes.
Though, those opinions may differ widely amongst the Sciforums populace, but the earlier given definition for the term "Punishment" is my general perception of said word.
 
Definition of punishment: A penalty imposed for wrongdoing

Originally Posted by cluelusshusbund
...do you thank ALL punishments are deserved.???

No, I don't. But generally every undeserved punishment is considered as mistreatment, or abuse in my eyes.

An i thank all punishment is mistreetment/abuce.!!!

...the earlier given definition for the term "Punishment" is my general perception of said word.

After you gave the definiton of punishment i learned that you dont thank all punishment is deserved... so... whare you goin wit that trane of thout.???
 
Last edited:
Originally Posted by cluelusshusbund
...do you thank ALL punishments are deserved.???



An i thank all punishment is mistreetment/abuce.!!!



After you gave the definiton of punishment i learned that you dont thank all punishment is deserved... so... whare you goin wit that trane of thout.???

My bad, I should have elaborated it a titbit more. When I said, "No, I don't" in response to your question whether all punishments are deserved or not, I meant to imply with this that some punishments are based on wrong facts, i.e. that it happens that some people get falsely punished for something they haven't done (happens in the judiciary system, and wherever the f*ck in the world), but that under normal circumstances the general concept of punishment is, IN MY EYES, that it was a deserved one, and not one given out of false reasons, or facts.

So, if I kick you in the balls, and if lex talionis would be applied in this case then it would be perfectly understandable, wouldn't it?
 
when all the shouting of "woa-is-me" and "poor-me" has died down take a moment to stop and think about what the subject is.

it is about hitting children not hitting adults.
not children hitting children
or children hitting adults.

just adults hitting children and beleiving they have impunity to do so and not get hit back by their kids or other adults or allow their own kid to hit other kids.

its all completely nuts really.

those who hit their kids do have a lower IQ because they lack the adult maturity to psychologically dominate a child.

simple really !
and... retard parents will spawn retard children who go about acting retardedly towards others and retarding society in general.

there is not a single kid who got to where they are because of their parent hitting them.
they got their in spite of it !
 
Back
Top