Not to skip past all of the child abuse and so forth that we unfortunately hear about.
What you are saying in the above is that children don't understand and they may not understand all of the troubles that adults go through including at times raising and paying for them.
But the children do understand very well what it was they did to get in trouble. And again, I am not talking about abused children, that is a totally different scenario.
I for example, knew damn well what I did was wrong and when I did it and knew when I was crossing a line that mean't risking a spanking. I did it for reasons usually with some peer pressure or to challenge them to see if I could get away with it.
One of the great ironies of childhood is that children often get in lots of trouble for conforming to peer pressure in an identical way that is demanded of them to conform to parental pressure. Moreover, ones independent conscious life really cannot begin until the first act of shameless disobedience. It isn’t healthy for all of our actions to be completely controlled by another human being. By spanking, as I will argue here, you are ensuring that it is impossible for the child to ever escape their parents, because the shaming attitude of the parents is internalized by the kid, in order to prevent future attacks. This internalized attitude of external motivation/de-motivation for behavior lasts forever, as is demonstrated by your instinct to defend adults.
That is usually the difference between a parent and someone who has never had kids, they think all kids are perfect little joys on the earth. In fact they are little people, young adults and they make mistakes and they test and they challenge and they need boundaries.
I’d say the main problem is the lack of boundaries on the part of the parent who spanks. The very terminology concerning testing and challenging is needlessly pejorative. I’d be deeply unnerved if children didn’t test and challenge, that’s a part of figuring the world out, and one should never given the impression that it is forbidden (as through spanking and other harsh punishments). Given that there isn’t a single perfect person on the planet, anytime there is conflict between a parent and a child it is an opportunity for BOTH to learn something new, rather than for the parent to unilaterally judge and punish the child, because there is no such thing as an inherently ‘bad’ kid, they just need guidance, and examples of moral courage in order to learn and grow.
I know I am not alone in saying this is false.
I was never abused. I was at fault in those instances. I do very much respect my parents and my parents are exceptional human beings.
And if you notice, I have become an adult who takes responsibility for my actions and words. My parents taught me that.
When they are abused, correct. Spanking your kid for crossing the line after repeated attempts to correct the behavior in other ways is not abuse.
This comment gets to the very heart of my argument. If you notice, few people (if any) who were spanked ever say that it was wrong for them to be spanked. This crosses the spectrum from what you would call ‘justified’ spanking all the way along the curve of ‘abusive’ spanking. There is a very pernicious reason for this, and it is because of guilt.
Spanking is wrong because it corrupts the ability of people to ever conceive of themselves as having intrinsic value, and they spend their entire lives defending the actions of the parent, even spanking their own kids to prove the point. This isn’t because of genuine respect, but because of genuine dissociation from their earlier humiliation as children. Their worth can never again be conceived of as intrinsically motivated, because their parents, through physical intervention, had to drag them along out of the muck of their own instincts, out of their unique ability to grow with every gift that nature granted them at the beginning of life, into adulthood with the meathooks of fear and guilt. Every person is their own greatest teacher, but guilt robs them of that, because guilt is supremely unnatural to carry around for an entire lifetime. Little stabs of it here and there for posterity, but never a lifetime, over something that WASN'T THEIR FAULT.
No child is ever responsible for the violence of a parent.
.
Yes because you can't have deep reasonable compelling conversations with a 4 year old. They still think it's possible for Santa Claus to be real.
I would respond by pointing out that it’s the parents who are the clowns who teach their four year old about Santa to begin with. If you have the attitude that you have nothing compelling to learn from a four year old than it begs the question, why the hell have kids to begin with?
And yet I am here to admit honestly that I deserved the spankings I got. I am not going to ever blame them because they were truly my fault. My parents never hit me in anger and I know exactly the pain they went through when it came to having to spank me. I have spanked my two kids 6 and 10 year olds a total of 6 times in the lives thus far and I don't expect to ever have to do it again.
It’s because you don’t blame your parents, and instead blame yourself, that you cannot ever truly be free. Even if they happened to be right about the issues that lead to the spanking, they robbed you of ever being able to have true ownership over yourself. Instead of conceiving of yourself as having intrinsic self-worth, you’ve established a narrative where you were a bratty kid who needed to be harshly corrected by wise and benevolent parents. No child EVER deserves to be humiliated. It’s a universal principle, not a local preference.
I truly hurt me more than it did them. Just like it did my dad.
No it didn’t. You dominated your children in order to protect yourself from the pain of having been spanked yourself. It’s selfish and immoral. I must point out that I take this hard-line more for my sake than your own, because I believe seeing shades of grey in areas such as this turns the whole world opaque.
How bout we let the children pay all the bills and make the decisions on what we should have for dinner while your at it.
Do you resent children for being children? This comment is revealing because you refer to your wealth and status and authority as being your value, without seemingly any other context than to belittle them: Which is unnecessary, because as you might have noticed adults are the only ones who have a voice in this conversation.
It's a real stretch to say because we have spanked our kids a few times in their lives for going over the line. That all of the sudden after years of waking up and taking care of their helpless selves as babies and making sure they have food to eat and a warm bed to sleep in and on and on and on, that we are just abusers.
Again, guilting as a defence mechanism. Why put yourself in a position to ever be compared with abusers to begin with? The unintended connotation here is that chilren are useless, and that taking care of them is a tremendous burden, so the parents deserve some sort of occasional release. I've yet to see a principled response from anyone that spanking is good. Instead, it's either the ex-post-facto "I turned out fine" argumnet, or diversionary comments which justifies the parent by pointing out all the other stuff they do.