some thoughts for a better world

[nicholas1M7]

the foundational aspects of human nature transcends cultural bounds. for example, the human nature of a woman giving birth to an child is understood in every culture from africa to north america. the social mentality of the individual mind is due in totality to the economy. in fact, everything is due to the economy. the morality of a country is the effect of its cultural images. we should think in terms of the individual versus the masses. both of which have needs of each other. hence its a closed loop. generally speaking, the individual generates the economic climate by providing to the sum and in turn, the economy provides the individual with everything from lifestyle to culture to mentality. at the heart of the capitalist organism is individual competitveness for lifestyle, culture, and mentality. it is the understanding of certain peoples that competition occurs at the cost of certain fundamental principles necessary for the understanding of outside groups to which outside individuals belong. notice in third world countries the line between individuals is less apparent. however, the individual morality plummets with economic depression as the needs of the individual reach a new low at or near the basic survival level leading us to an argumentational paradox.


the individual leaders of a country act as filtration mechanisms in the exchange of images between the mass and the individual. that is, they control the images reaching our eyes and ears. images create mentality and hence morality. we fit ourselves and others into mass distributed images. those images set standards that are cultural, genetic and moralistic. which is not to say that doing so is right or wrong but rather, their is a potential cost to the distribution of individual advantages. one solution is perhaps for the economy to provide an ideal to work towards, so that the disadvantaged may be given a greater opportunity in case there's one out there who is willing to grab it.


Nicholas.

 

[robtex]

Hey wow u speak english!! Wish I had read this thread first. Create an example for your hypothsis and walk us through it. What are the ethical (as we are on the ethics thread) implications and consquences of your example?

 

[nicholas1M7]

What it boils down to is this: The economy sets the living standard, the mentality and the population morality. Our direction... is based on our notion of what the culture compounds as most desirable - including the way we treat one another. To put it another way; the capitalistic means of freedom is to randomize humanity by excluding fairness and equality, resulting in the plummet of population morality.

It is a form of distancing the individual from humanitarianism and instilling in them, a kind of self-illusive empowering via a totalitarian optimism frame of thought.

 

[nicholas1M7]

Consider an individual. His/her choice of fun has long been determined by the economy. Their choice or taste in parties and crowds is all determined by their living standard, mentality, which formulates their standard of morality.