Sniper killing

Would you consider a drone-strike to be murder?
Or a tomahawk strike?
What about a tank that fires at targets 2 miles away?
A plane that drops a bomb?

Each of them also involves the delivery of a projectile of some form or other at an enemy target, often with additional explosive power rather than relying on sheer kinetic force.

If these are not to be considered murder, why would a sniper shot be any different?
Because of the perceived personal involvement of the shooter?
Because the target was unaware of the shot being fired?
 
Ryan Cleckner, a former U.S. Army Ranger sniper who served two tours of duty in Afghanistan and wrote the authoritative “Long Range Shooting Handbook,” called the feat an “incredible”
.......................
in·cred·i·ble
inˈkredəb(ə)l/
adjective
  1. 1.
    impossible to believe.
    "an almost incredible tale of triumph and tragedy"
    synonyms:unbelievable, beyond belief, hard to believe, unconvincing, far-fetched, implausible, improbable, highly unlikely, dubious, doubtful;
    .....................................coming to a warm body near you
    5165_50_cal_.510_750gr_a-max.jpg
Private to sergeant
"Sarg, I can't shoot women and children"
Sergeant to private:
"Sure you can, just don't lead 'em as much"

War is a criminal enterprise
Dead is dead no matter what label you put on it.
 
Last edited:
Would you consider a drone-strike to be murder?
Or a tomahawk strike?
What about a tank that fires at targets 2 miles away?
A plane that drops a bomb?

Each of them also involves the delivery of a projectile of some form or other at an enemy target, often with additional explosive power rather than relying on sheer kinetic force.

If these are not to be considered murder, why would a sniper shot be any different?
Because of the perceived personal involvement of the shooter?
Because the target was unaware of the shot being fired?
 
I am aware of your analoge, all that is murdering, We obey orders, we try to do our best, What a tragedy?
One side is enjoying and the other is crying.
 
That's true of war in general, not just sniper work.

Both sides are crying.

I did not mean to pick on the sniper ,nor on anybody in uniform.
I just thought that if anybody wants eliminate some at large distance can do it by using a sniper scope.
 
Sorry, you are right. There's a second criterion.

It occurred between combatants in a war. Both sides were soldiers, in armies, combat-ready.

The Holocaust was murder because it targeted unarmed, civilian non-combatants.

What would be called dropping nuclear bomb on civilian ?
 
I think that a sniper hitting a target 3,540 meters away is an amazing technical feat.

The Canadian Army has a reputation in the US Army for the excellence of its snipers.
 
So, is this all a sign to allied ground forces being a step closer in Syria and Iraq?
 
Back
Top