Sex_Swing

yep mohamed the pediophile, greatest leader of morality in the world. actually acording to this site i just found im wrong she was 6 so its worse than 8. seriously if my moral guide was a pediphile i would kill myself but i guess i have a better sence of morality than you do. mass murder too aparently, great activist for human rights. not to mention he had how many wives? so he is a poligimist as well.

so lets say 2 years per wife
+ 15 years for each time he screwed her which is at least once
+ 25-life for each murder

i would say your "hero" would be due for parole about now sometime

course because he was a child rapist he would fall under the "never to be releaced" legislation now

oh and what was the statement that sam said muslim clerics had relaced about child rape?
i know that christans think they all go to hell now so i guess he would be in good company, he would have lots of little boys to play with there who would be happy to let him feel them up im sure

dont talk to me about morality until you can use propper moral theory to back up your arguments
 
What the hell are you talking about? I'm not Muslim. And Aisha was "consenting", so according to you it should be perfectly fine.
 
you mean like men consenting to have sex with other men?
THANKYOU for finally agreeing with me:)
 
Asguard said:
you mean like men consenting to have sex with other men?
THANKYOU for finally agreeing with me:)
Click to expand...

That crosses a different line. Consent isn't everything. Incest, then, should be allowed if both partners are "consenting"
 
nope you cant chance your argument now, you snokered yourself. pay more atention in future:)
 
you sure you want to continue?

i will win you know, not only do i have proven ethical theory to back me up where as you have nothing
i also have the majority of people in the westen world who agree with me (as shown by the fact that they returned goverments who legalised homosexuality)
AND i have the law on my side, both the criminal statutes and the antidiscrimation acts

so go ahead. prove that mohumid was more moral than a gay couple, i dare you
 
Asguard said:
you sure you want to continue?

i will win you know, not only do i have proven ethical theory to back me up where as you have nothing
i also have the majority of people in the westen world who agree with me (as shown by the fact that they returned goverments who legalised homosexuality)
AND i have the law on my side, both the criminal statutes and the antidiscrimation acts

so go ahead. prove that mohumid was more moral than a gay couple, i dare you
Click to expand...

Nobody can win opinion
 
technically your correct because its on an area of ethics, however that doesnt work in a debate, someone wins someone loses.

go ahead however and debate me, i will even make it a formal debate if you would like between you and me as to who is more ethical.
you can use any recognised system of ethics you like
 
Asguard said:
technically your correct because its on an area of ethics, however that doesnt work in a debate, someone wins someone loses.

go ahead however and debate me, i will even make it a formal debate if you would like between you and me as to who is more ethical.
you can use any recognised system of ethics you like
Click to expand...

Debating what? Again, I'm not Muslim, and I'm not saying what Muhummad did was right, but merely that Aisha was consenting, and that it was a differnet time period in a different culture, so it's completely irrelevant.
 
doesnt matter, she couldnt concent where as two adults of either gender CAN concent. therefor homosexuals are more ethical than muslims because muslims belive in a pediphile
 
Asguard said:
doesnt matter, she couldnt concent where as two adults of either gender CAN concent. therefor homosexuals are more ethical than muslims because muslims belive in a pediphile
Click to expand...

How could she not consent? 9 is certainly old enough to realize what's happening. Also, as I said, consent is not the only factor.
 
WHAT????????

you honestly belive that even a 9 year old understands what sex is and all the things that go with it?

you really are sick
 
ummm no its no, its sexual penitration of a child under 10 which is concidered one of the worst offences in the crimes act
 
Crimes Act 1958 - SECT 45
Sexual penetration of child under the age of 16

45. Sexual penetration of child under the age of 16



(1) A person who takes part in an act of sexual penetration with a child under
the age of 16 is guilty of an indictable offence.

(2) A person who is guilty of an offence against subsection (1) is liable-

(a) if the court is satisfied beyond reasonable doubt that the child was,
at the time of the offence, under the age of 10, to level 2
imprisonment (25 years maximum); or
Click to expand...

(4) Consent is not a defence to a charge under subsection (1) unless at the
time of the alleged offence the child was aged 10 or older and-

(a) the accused satisfies the court on the balance of probabilities that
he or she believed on reasonable grounds that the child was aged 16 or
older; or

(b) the accused was not more than 2 years older than the child; or

(c) the accused satisfies the court on the balance of probabilities that
he or she believed on reasonable grounds that he or she was married to
the child.
Click to expand...

http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/legis/vic/consol_act/ca195882/s45.html
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top