Sciforums Quotes Thread

Yep, we have to kill you now, because you'll probably never say anything as cool or quotable for the rest of your life.

Haha. Well, in my almost one year being here i've had two quotes in this thread. And since I have no life I shall spend my hours thinking of more to end up here. :p
 
zombie-nurse-4.jpg


But zombies want GORE! GORE! and they will always vote for candidates with the most BRAAAAINS!

(Sorry, just couldn't help myself...moving right along now...)


http://sciforums.com/showthread.php?p=2708149#post2708149
 
Well, Joepistole said the Republicans were going for the zombie vote...:shrug:

The other day I thought Kremmie was a riot when he said this:


Originally Posted by Randwolf (post #75)
Ironically, deer kill even more - like 20,000 + (because of car accidents)...

”Originally posted by Captain Kremmen" (post#79)
That's terrible.
They shouldn't be allowed to drive at all!

http://www.sciforums.com/showthread.php?t=106734&page=4
 
Last edited:
Gump

James R said:

When Bubba hits you with a pool cue because he disagrees with your analysis of Prospero's motivations, that's the point at which you'd be thinking that you shouldn't have mentiond The Tempest in the first place, I guess, and that it's really ALL YOUR FAULT. Right?


To Wynn

Ah, yes. This is what argument has come to at Sciforums.

Really, just think about that for a moment. I mean, you might think at first glance that James was being sarcastic about something, or otherwise humorous. Because what discussion could possibly demand that consideration as a straight argument?
 
This is an excellent point made by quadraphonics
quadraphonics said:
In general, when one encounters political positions that make no sense to one, yet nevertheless command widespread support from large segments of the electorate, it's best to approach the situation with a certain humility and attempt to figure out just what the hell is going on. Typically, you'll discover that there exists some alternative perspective from which these positions appear coherent and principled, and which you will need to account for and address if you are to have any hope of formulating any kind of effective political rhetoric in response.
http://www.sciforums.com/showpost.php?p=2951300&postcount=17
 
Back
Top